Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#649 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
6.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
-35% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.41
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
600 MSC TOMOKO
IMO 9309461
8,401 TEU 2006
6.6
B
599 MSC NOA
IMO 9398228
6,969 TEU 2009
6.6
B
603 CMA CGM TOKYO
IMO 9629380
6,622 TEU 2013
6.6
B
604 EVER LUCENT
IMO 9629067
8,488 TEU 2011
6.6
B
607 MSC ADELAIDE
IMO 9618290
8,827 TEU 2013
6.6
B
606 MSC RIKKU
IMO 9393319
8,600 TEU 2009
6.6
B
608 SANTOS EXPRESS
IMO 9777632
10,589 TEU 2017
6.6
B
605 CAUTIN
IMO 9687538
9,300 TEU 2014
6.6
B
610 MSC CASSANDRE
IMO 9785471
11,500 TEU 2022
6.6
B
609 MSC ABY
IMO 9166778
7,226 TEU 1999
6.6
B
611 ZIM AMBER
IMO 9967952
7,000 TEU 2023
6.6
B
612 MAERSK CUBANGO
IMO 9525481
4,500 TEU 2008
6.6
B
615 SANTA CATARINA
IMO 9444730
7,090 TEU 2011
6.7
B
614 VALIANT
IMO 9628178
8,827 TEU 2013
6.7
B
616 CMA CGM BEIRA
IMO 9302956
2,602 TEU 2006
6.7
B
613 ONE MANEUVER
IMO 9475648
6,724 TEU 2011
6.7
B
617 APL VANCOUVER
IMO 9597472
9,200 TEU 2010
6.7
B
619 KUALA LUMPUR EXPRESS
IMO 9343730
8,749 TEU 2008
6.7
B
618 MAERSK GIBRALTAR
IMO 9739692
10,100 TEU 2016
6.7
B
621 TIRUA
IMO 9612882
8,004 TEU 2012
6.7
B
620 CMA CGM FORT BOURBON
IMO 9966752
7,600 TEU 2024
6.7
B
622 MAERSK KINLOSS
IMO 9333022
6,200 TEU 2008
6.7
B
623 MAERSK SELETAR
IMO 9315197
5,648 TEU 2007
6.7
B
625 OOCL CHONGQING
IMO 9622629
13,200 TEU 2011
6.7
B
624 NAVIOS CONSTELLATION
IMO 9408877
9,954 TEU 2011
6.7
B
627 ISTANBUL EXPRESS
IMO 9723277
9,040 TEU 2016
6.7
B
626 CMA CGM LAMARTINE
IMO 9409194
6,500 TEU 2010
6.7
B
629 KOTKA
IMO 9085534
6,418 TEU 1996
6.7
B
631 MSC FLAVIA
IMO 9467433
12,400 TEU 2012
6.7
B
628 MSC YUKTA X
IMO 9146467
7,226 TEU 1995
6.7
B
632 MSC ELMA
IMO 9735218
9,408 TEU 2016
6.7
B
630 MSC SANDRA
IMO 9203954
4,315 TEU 2000
6.7
B
634 EBBA MAERSK
IMO 9321524
11,000 TEU 2004
6.7
B
633 MSC MELINE
IMO 9702077
8,819 TEU 2015
6.7
B
637 XIN SHANGHAI
IMO 9307231
9,574 TEU 2006
6.7
B
636 MSC MARIA ELENA
IMO 9304423
9,178 TEU 2006
6.7
B
635 JAZAN
IMO 9349540
6,435 TEU 2008
6.7
B
640 MAERSK COLOMBO
IMO 9525390
4,500 TEU 2008
6.7
B
639 VALUE
IMO 9628166
8,827 TEU 2013
6.7
B
638 HYUNDAI VOYAGER
IMO 9347580
4,728 TEU 2008
6.7
B
641 MSC DESIREE
IMO 9745665
9,408 TEU 2017
6.7
B
642 MSC MARGRIT
IMO 9465318
13,102 TEU 2012
6.7
B
644 ALTAMIRA EXPRESS
IMO 9407146
5,041 TEU 2009
6.8
B
643 OSAKA EXPRESS
IMO 9320697
8,749 TEU 2007
6.8
B
648 CALLAO EXPRESS
IMO 9777606
10,589 TEU 2016
6.8
B
647 APL NEW YORK
IMO 9597484
9,200 TEU 2010
6.8
B
646 SANTA URSULA
IMO 9430387
7,114 TEU 2012
6.8
B
645 BREMEN EXPRESS
IMO 9343728
8,749 TEU 2008
6.8
B
650 MSC VANCOUVER
IMO 9285691
7,849 TEU 2004
6.8
B
649 MSC ABIDJAN
IMO 9618264
8,827 TEU 2013
6.8
B
Page 13 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.