Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#941 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-18% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
901 BONITA
IMO 9297541
108,386 2006
4.1
C
902 ADVANTAGE LIFE
IMO 9708564
109,999 2015
4.1
C
903 IONIC ASPIS
IMO 9523287
107,508 2011
4.1
C
904 ANDRE REBOUCAS
IMO 9453846
157,055 2009
4.1
C
905 HUA LIN WAN
IMO 9614086
109,475 2012
4.1
C
906 CATALAN SEA
IMO 9577044
116,620 2012
4.1
C
907 AMAZON VICTORY
IMO 9660358
72,412 2012
4.1
C
908 YINGHAO CONFIDENCE
IMO 9389978
107,600 2010
4.1
C
909 JAG AANCHAL
IMO 9390161
74,811 2008
4.1
C
910 JAARLI
IMO 9892432
112,459 2021
4.1
C
911 SCORPIO
IMO 9389071
107,157 2009
4.1
C
912 GREEN ATTITUDE
IMO 9808156
112,532 2018
4.1
C
913 SFL PANTHER
IMO 9664782
115,238 2012
4.1
C
914 AMAZON
IMO 9476654
149,999 2011
4.1
C
915 IASONAS
IMO 9419357
115,500 2006
4.1
C
916 LUCKY TRADER
IMO 9952608
49,814 2021
4.1
C
917 HAFNIA SHINANO
IMO 9506069
76,594 2008
4.1
C
918 DONEGAL SPIRIT
IMO 9312846
105,611 2006
4.1
C
919 STI OXFORD
IMO 9697595
109,999 2015
4.1
C
920 DELTA STAR
IMO 9458016
115,618 2013
4.1
C
921 CSK VANGUARD
IMO 9728423
114,667 2013
4.1
C
922 CIELO BIANCO
IMO 9778296
74,999 2015
4.1
C
923 SAGA
IMO 9528031
115,739 2008
4.2
C
924 ZOUZOU N.
IMO 9410222
149,991 2010
4.2
C
925 ADVANTAGE PADOVA
IMO 9794848
75,111 2019
4.2
C
926 STI GOAL
IMO 9717125
109,999 2016
4.2
C
927 STI PARK
IMO 9690793
109,999 2013
4.2
C
928 A LEOPARD
IMO 9838589
114,066 2021
4.2
C
929 CAPTAIN A. STELLATOS
IMO 9439670
105,848 2010
4.2
C
930 CIELO ROSSO
IMO 9778301
74,999 2015
4.2
C
931 GULF CORAL
IMO 9389851
74,999 2009
4.2
C
932 SYROS WARRIOR
IMO 9370850
107,687 2005
4.2
C
933 STI KINGSWAY
IMO 9712852
109,999 2015
4.2
C
934 MINERVA ELLIE
IMO 9297321
103,195 2005
4.2
C
935 HAFNIA YANGTZE
IMO 9393096
76,578 2009
4.2
C
936 TYRRHENIAN SEA
IMO 9829100
114,218 2017
4.2
C
937 BNEIDER
IMO 9595010
110,587 2012
4.2
C
938 ALTAI
IMO 9446427
115,952 2011
4.2
C
939 APSOGOS
IMO 9282053
115,444 2004
4.2
C
940 LEYTE SPIRIT
IMO 9484089
109,670 2008
4.2
C
941 ALYARMOUK
IMO 9356438
116,038 2008
4.2
C
942 DUGI OTOK
IMO 9334727
108,414 2008
4.2
C
943 ARCTICA
IMO 9305556
117,099 2005
4.2
C
944 HAFNIA PRECISION
IMO 9760213
74,997 2016
4.2
C
945 BLUE PRINCE
IMO 9429182
109,010 2009
4.2
C
946 P. MONTEREY
IMO 9568172
105,525 2009
4.2
C
947 LIWA-V
IMO 9489039
105,221 2011
4.2
C
948 NEW VISION
IMO 9804459
157,617 2018
4.2
C
949 SEA JEWEL
IMO 9607722
112,081 2010
4.2
C
950 ALPES
IMO 9817470
112,504 2018
4.2
C
Page 19 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.