Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,335 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
15.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
+8% higher
C

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1301 LADY BERNA
IMO 9214733
6,776 2003
14.9
C
1302 HUDSONGRACHT
IMO 9433262
12,709 2008
14.9
C
1303 BALTIC COASTER
IMO 9963009
3,806 2024
14.9
C
1304 ALICE
IMO 9677399
5,110 2013
14.9
C
1305 UGURS
IMO 9539793
4,406 2010
14.9
C
1306 TIDE NAVIGATOR
IMO 9526083
8,284 2011
14.9
C
1307 UTE
IMO 9433339
7,400 2008
14.9
C
1308 TAMAR
IMO 9341160
9,402 2006
14.9
C
1309 SAFIYE ANA
IMO 9319947
3,536 2004
14.9
C
1310 WILSON AVEIRO
IMO 9375850
3,605 2008
14.9
C
1311 HAV SUND
IMO 9361768
4,950 2008
14.9
C
1312 RAMA H
IMO 8105404
8,214 1982
14.9
C
1313 NICOLE
IMO 9454814
6,684 2009
14.9
C
1314 WES ELISA
IMO 9953975
3,801 2023
14.9
C
1315 ANNIKA BRAREN
IMO 9849148
5,023 2020
15.0
C
1316 BELLIS
IMO 9381952
6,804 2007
15.0
C
1317 EDMY
IMO 9263540
7,894 2002
15.0
C
1318 KAIRE
IMO 9454802
6,684 2008
15.0
C
1319 HOUTMANGRACHT
IMO 9435765
12,635 2009
15.0
C
1320 ONEGO OTRA
IMO 9535606
10,872 2010
15.0
C
1321 TUNA
IMO 9306691
4,775 2004
15.0
C
1322 STEVIE
IMO 9488035
12,767 2010
15.0
C
1323 BBC ALBERTA
IMO 9468102
12,669 2010
15.0
C
1324 LONGVIND
IMO 9547336
6,132 2011
15.0
C
1325 SVEALAND
IMO 9195743
3,783 2001
15.0
C
1326 DINTELDIJK
IMO 9346677
4,891 2007
15.0
C
1327 ELECTRAMAR
IMO 9951824
5,424 2023
15.0
C
1328 RIX STREAM
IMO 9111125
2,689 1994
15.0
C
1329 FLEVOGRACHT
IMO 9509956
12,086 2011
15.0
C
1330 SEA PROSPECT
IMO 9516143
9,735 2012
15.0
C
1331 MARGARETHA
IMO 9240548
10,526 2002
15.0
C
1332 WILSON PORI
IMO 9201839
4,966 1999
15.0
C
1333 SILVER LION
IMO 9281487
6,315 2005
15.1
C
1334 ANNA
IMO 9361110
5,097 2008
15.1
C
1335 KLEER
IMO 9393840
5,907 2008
15.1
C
1336 M/V MANISA SOLE
IMO 9306304
8,211 2006
15.1
C
1337 OCEAN TRANGA
IMO 9532812
8,250 2011
15.1
C
1338 ALMA
IMO 9969429
3,641 2024
15.1
C
1339 ANNA
IMO 9566796
7,712 2011
15.1
C
1340 SPANACO LOYALTY
IMO 9373503
5,000 2007
15.1
C
1341 SCHOUWENBANK
IMO 9361732
4,995 2007
15.1
C
1342 HIKMET KARABEKIR
IMO 9421087
8,113 2008
15.1
C
1343 JAMTLAND
IMO 9277319
7,755 2003
15.1
C
1344 WAALBORG
IMO 9505546
9,661 2010
15.1
C
1345 FL STOROE
IMO 9268851
6,011 2005
15.1
C
1346 WILSON HERON
IMO 9116022
4,228 1994
15.1
C
1347 AMELAND
IMO 9508794
8,398 2009
15.1
C
1348 MARIETJE NORA
IMO 9481609
9,068 2015
15.1
C
1349 KRIS
IMO 9408889
8,678 2007
15.1
C
1350 FRIEDHELM
IMO 9953951
3,803 2023
15.1
C
Page 27 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.