Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,257 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
14.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
+6% higher
C

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1251 ARA ROTTERDAM
IMO 9549566
13,524 2012
14.7
C
1252 FORTUNAGRACHT
IMO 9507609
12,094 2012
14.7
C
1253 MSC ADA F
IMO 9190119
14,000 2000
14.7
C
1254 RIX PACIFIC
IMO 9167978
3,210 1998
14.7
C
1255 IRIS I
IMO 9341172
9,402 2007
14.7
C
1256 JOAV I
IMO 9020285
4,191 1991
14.7
C
1257 JULIE
IMO 9277307
7,890 2003
14.7
C
1258 WESERBORG
IMO 9505558
9,685 2011
14.7
C
1259 VIKTORIA-B
IMO 9313632
2,910 2005
14.7
C
1260 ELARA
IMO 9437323
18,377 2010
14.7
C
1261 FRI BERGEN
IMO 9361122
5,756 2009
14.7
C
1262 SEMSA
IMO 9015424
2,646 1992
14.7
C
1263 FRANZISKA
IMO 9535618
10,872 2011
14.7
C
1264 ALAND
IMO 9147459
3,246 1996
14.7
C
1265 AMADEUS PEARL
IMO 9995844
3,811 2024
14.8
C
1266 AGN RAGNAR
IMO 9148104
3,420 1996
14.8
C
1267 KAREWOOD GLORY
IMO 9281504
6,315 2006
14.8
C
1268 ANNIE
IMO 9468097
12,654 2010
14.8
C
1269 KIRSI
IMO 9490179
5,746 2012
14.8
C
1270 ATALAYA TMA
IMO 9369291
7,353 2008
14.8
C
1271 WES ESTHER
IMO 9953963
3,809 2023
14.8
C
1272 AZZARO
IMO 9213727
8,733 2000
14.8
C
1273 ECOMAR
IMO 9951848
5,433 2024
14.8
C
1274 AMBERLAND
IMO 9518969
5,724 2010
14.8
C
1275 FWN ATLANTIDE
IMO 9535620
10,872 2011
14.8
C
1276 FEED HELGELAND
IMO 9163635
4,934 1999
14.8
C
1277 YUCATAN
IMO 9367841
3,291 2005
14.8
C
1278 BORE WAY
IMO 9892884
6,768 2022
14.8
C
1279 UAL AFRICA
IMO 9529243
8,327 2011
14.8
C
1280 DELTAGRACHT
IMO 9420801
18,143 2009
14.8
C
1281 MORNING TIDE
IMO 9320506
12,008 2006
14.8
C
1282 KONINGSBORG
IMO 9155925
9,067 1998
14.8
C
1283 WILSON ECO I
IMO 1052139
3,800 2025
14.8
C
1284 JAEGER ARROW
IMO 9215347
23,529 2001
14.8
C
1285 SEA EXPLORER
IMO 9516155
9,736 2012
14.8
C
1286 JUTLAND
IMO 9277345
7,870 2004
14.8
C
1287 FULDATAL
IMO 9962988
3,804 2024
14.8
C
1288 ERGE
IMO 9508603
5,652 2010
14.8
C
1289 NORRLAND
IMO 9358278
7,868 2006
14.8
C
1290 EYUP
IMO 9306392
7,601 2005
14.8
C
1291 UNZILE ANA
IMO 9133367
4,217 1996
14.8
C
1292 BENABELL G.
IMO 9864772
3,798 2021
14.8
C
1293 WES MADITA
IMO 9962990
3,803 2024
14.8
C
1294 WILSON SUND
IMO 8918473
6,486 1999
14.8
C
1295 SIDER VULCANO
IMO 9486312
8,108 2010
14.9
C
1296 DEDEM
IMO 9001124
3,490 1993
14.9
C
1297 KIKKI C
IMO 9558036
6,805 2011
14.9
C
1298 HAPPY DOVER
IMO 9551959
18,074 2011
14.9
C
1299 SNOEKGRACHT
IMO 9202546
21,404 2000
14.9
C
1300 MUNTGRACHT
IMO 9571545
11,736 2012
14.9
C
Page 26 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.