Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,577 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
12.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
+23% higher
D
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1551 SEATRADE BLUE
IMO 9756107
2,259 TEU 2017
12.5
D
1552 AS CARELIA
IMO 9309409
2,824 TEU 2006
12.5
D
1553 MAERSK NESTON
IMO 9215907
2,556 TEU 1999
12.6
D
1554 WINDSWEPT
IMO 9399806
2,750 TEU 2010
12.6
D
1555 PANDA 005
IMO 9981063
1,400 TEU 2022
12.6
D
1556 PANDA 004
IMO 9968906
1,400 TEU 2024
12.6
D
1557 MIRADOR EXPRESS
IMO 9243174
3,237 TEU 2002
12.6
D
1558 CONTAINERSHIPS NORD
IMO 9813993
1,368 TEU 2015
12.6
D
1559 DJANET
IMO 9845063
1,500 TEU 2020
12.6
D
1560 ZEBRA
IMO 9231157
2,602 TEU 2001
12.7
D
1561 ST. JOHN
IMO 9634646
1,700 TEU 2014
12.7
D
1562 AS FREYA
IMO 9292436
1,200 TEU 2004
12.7
D
1563 MICHEL A
IMO 9379349
1,604 TEU 2007
12.7
D
1564 AS NINA
IMO 9401178
3,400 TEU 2006
12.7
D
1565 MAERSK NANSHA
IMO 9385996
2,546 TEU 2008
12.7
D
1566 MSC RHIANNON
IMO 9224051
2,024 TEU 2001
12.7
D
1567 MSC LEANDRA V
IMO 9313943
4,196 TEU 2007
12.7
D
1568 CALISTO
IMO 9306067
1,574 TEU 2005
12.7
D
1569 HANSA ROTENBURG
IMO 9401673
1,740 TEU 2009
12.8
D
1570 MARLA TIGER
IMO 9932933
1,984 TEU 2015
12.8
D
1571 JOHANNES MAERSK
IMO 9215189
2,840 TEU 2001
12.8
D
1572 DELPHIS RIGA
IMO 9780665
2,155 TEU 2017
12.8
D
1573 BELITAKI
IMO 9152923
1,684 TEU 1998
12.8
D
1574 VALDIVIA
IMO 9333395
1,678 TEU 2006
12.8
D
1575 MAERSK NILE
IMO 9385972
2,546 TEU 2008
12.8
D
1576 HALLEY
IMO 9275062
2,556 TEU 2004
12.8
D
1577 SC MONTREAL
IMO 9311830
2,478 TEU 2004
12.8
D
1578 CMA CGM FORT STE MARIE
IMO 9261906
2,260 TEU 2003
12.8
D
1579 ORNELLA
IMO 9634660
1,700 TEU 2012
12.9
D
1580 EMMA A
IMO 9308194
2,800 TEU 2007
12.9
D
1581 CMA CGM PLATON
IMO 9362437
1,691 TEU 2007
12.9
D
1582 CMA CGM FORT FLEUR D'EPEE
IMO 9809851
3,300 TEU 2019
12.9
D
1583 HSL NIKE
IMO 9301457
2,556 TEU 2005
12.9
D
1584 MSC MANASVI II
IMO 9347724
1,440 TEU 2006
12.9
D
1585 CMA CGM VALPARAISO
IMO 9294185
2,824 TEU 2006
12.9
D
1586 MONA LISA
IMO 9309277
3,400 TEU 2006
12.9
D
1587 ETE N
IMO 9509126
2,758 TEU 2012
12.9
D
1588 MSC YOSHEEN
IMO 9322011
1,730 TEU 2008
13.0
D
1589 PHEN BASIN
IMO 9340752
4,250 TEU 2007
13.0
D
1590 JUDITH
IMO 9359260
1,440 TEU 2008
13.0
D
1591 MSC SUEDEROOG F
IMO 9256327
1,300 TEU 2005
13.0
D
1592 WANDA A
IMO 9415947
1,604 TEU 2008
13.0
D
1593 SAN ALFONSO
IMO 9344667
1,819 TEU 2007
13.1
D
1594 CALYPSO
IMO 9550371
1,577 TEU 2010
13.1
D
1595 AS PALINA
IMO 9283693
2,556 TEU 2004
13.1
D
1596 ESPOIR
IMO 9491472
1,349 TEU 2011
13.1
D
1597 CMA CGM FORT DE FRANCE
IMO 9809825
3,300 TEU 2019
13.1
D
1598 GFS SAPPHIRE
IMO 9330927
1,440 TEU 2007
13.1
D
1599 ELBTOWER
IMO 9968918
1,400 TEU 2021
13.1
D
1600 PANDA 003
IMO 9968891
1,400 TEU 2024
13.1
D
Page 32 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.