Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)

#1,474 of 2,098 container ships

CO₂ intensity

11.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm

vs segment average (10.38)

+11% higher

Bulk Carrier Container Ship Oil Tanker Chemical Tanker Gas Carrier LNG Carrier General Cargo Vehicle Carrier Refrigerated Cargo Ro-Ro Cargo

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E

A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

'27 Q1

'27 Q2

'27 Q3

'27 Q4

112

'28 Q1

'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

Measure	Eligible	CO₂ reduction	Capex band	Payback	Confidence
Turbocharger cut-out	1,485	1–3%	€80k–250k	—	vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement	1,440	5–10%	€400k–1,200k	—	vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling	1,344	2–6%	€300k–900k	—	vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion	965	5–15%	€8,000k–20,000k	—	vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion	795	15–25%	€15,000k–35,000k	—	vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO	360	3–6%	€500–1,500/kW	—	vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624

D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure

€3,295–7,790M

capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)

1.48–2.63 Mt

annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

Vessel	Band	Age	Drop year	Req. reduction 2030	Dock window
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k	E	16y	2026	78%	Jan 2028
SEPELU · <25k	E	26y	2026	69%	Aug 2028
MSC SABRINA III · <25k	E	37y	2026	61%	Mar 2027
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k	E	18y	2026	59%	Mar 2028
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k	E	21y	2026	55%	Feb 2027

See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

Sort 🌱 Greenest first 🔧 Least efficient first — retrofit candidates

Size (TEU)

All sizes < 3,000 TEU 3k – 8k TEU 8k – 14k TEU > 14,000 TEU

Year

2025 2024

2,076

vessels ranked

2.25

greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)

8.4

segment median

#	Vessel	Size (TEU)	Built	Length	Main Engine	Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm)	Grade
1451	MACAO IMO 9362724	1,795 TEU	2008	180 m	Hudong Heavy Machinery - 7 S 60 MC-C	11.5	D
1452	GISELE A IMO 9321471	2,700 TEU	2006	215 m	Hitachi - 7 L70MC-C	11.5	D
1453	MARIO A IMO 9337377	1,604 TEU	2007	184 m	MAN - 8S50MC-C	11.5	D
1454	NYSTED MAERSK IMO 9220897	2,226 TEU	2001	199 m	Sulzer - 7RTA84C	11.5	D
1455	CMA CGM MANAUS IMO 9434917	2,550 TEU	2009	210 m	Hyundai - 7 RTA 72 U-B	11.5	D
1456	TOMRIZ A IMO 9126754	1,119 TEU	1997	169 m	Mitsui - 7 S 50 MC	11.5	D
1457	PANTHER IMO 9138276	2,470 TEU	1998	207 m	DIESELMOTORENWERK ROSTOCK GMBH 6 L 70 MC	11.5	D
1458	MSC POLINA IMO 9376141	2,500 TEU	2008	209 m	Hudong Heavy Machinery - 7 RT-FLEX 68-B	11.5	D
1459	MSC JULIANA III IMO 9275036	2,556 TEU	2003	210 m	Hyundai - SULZER 7 RTA 72 U-B	11.5	D
1460	EVRIDIKI G IMO 9231482	2,530 TEU	2001	210 m	Sulzer - 7RTA72U	11.5	D
1461	MSC EAGLE III IMO 9302449	2,478 TEU	2004	207 m	Hitachi - 7 L70MC-C	11.6	D
1462	MSC KAYLA IMO 9242637	1,768 TEU	2002	179 m	MANISES DIESEL - 6 L 70 MC	11.6	D
1463	CONTAINERSHIPS STELLAR IMO 9866251	1,380 TEU	2021	170 m	Wärtsilä - 7RT-flex50DF	11.6	D
1464	MSC VANQUISH II IMO 9242625	1,768 TEU	2001	179 m	MANISES DIESEL - 6 L 70 MC	11.6	D
1465	MUKADDES KALKAVAN IMO 9365829	1,880 TEU	2008	183 m	MAN - 8S50MC-C	11.6	D
1466	CHIQUITA EXPRESS IMO 9304758	2,490 TEU	2005	212 m	Hyundai - 7 RTA 72 U-B	11.6	D
1467	CUSSLER IMO 9314997	2,824 TEU	2007	222 m	Hyundai - 7K80MC-C	11.6	D
1468	MSC CANCUN IMO 9403396	4,300 TEU	2009	259 m	MAN - 8K90MC-C	11.6	D
1469	BUXLINK IMO 9235816	2,478 TEU	2002	207 m	Wärtsilä - 7 RTA 72 U-B	11.7	D
1470	GARDINER IMO 9275048	2,556 TEU	2003	210 m	Sulzer - 7RTA72U-B	11.7	D
1471	FERDINANDA S IMO 9445019	1,577 TEU	2008	172 m	Mitsui - 7S60MC-C	11.7	D
1472	MSC RICHIKA F IMO 9386988	1,300 TEU	2008	161 m	Hudong Heavy Machinery - 6 S 60 MC-C	11.7	D
1473	NEWYORKER IMO 9209104	2,506 TEU	2001	207 m	Sulzer - 7RTA72U	11.7	D
1474	ECO UMANDE IMO 9959541	1,170 TEU	2024	148 m	UnKnown 5S50ME-C9-LGIM-coEGR	11.7	D
1475	CRISTINA A IMO 9337365	1,604 TEU	2007	184 m	MAN - 8S50MC-C	11.7	D
1476	DAISY IMO 9270684	2,200 TEU	2012	187 m	MAN - 6 L 70 MC	11.7	D
1477	EM HYDRA IMO 9338967	1,740 TEU	2005	175 m	MAN - 7S60MC-C	11.7	D
1478	TIGER IMO 9307841	2,524 TEU	2005	208 m	Doosan - 8 L 70 MC-C	11.7	D
1479	MARGUERITE A IMO 9305893	1,560 TEU	2005	184 m	MAN - 7S50MC-C	11.7	D
1480	CONTAINERSHIPS AURORA IMO 9814014	1,368 TEU	2019	170 m	Wärtsilä - 7RT-flex50DF	11.7	D
1481	CMA CGM VILA DO CONDE IMO 9434929	2,550 TEU	2009	210 m	Hyundai - 7 RTA 72 U-B	11.7	D
1482	EM CORFU IMO 9231494	2,530 TEU	2001	210 m	Sulzer - 7RTA72U-B	11.7	D
1483	CONTAINERSHIPS POLAR IMO 9814002	1,368 TEU	2019	170 m	Wärtsilä - 7RT-flex50DF	11.7	D
1484	SAGAMORE IMO 9322009	1,730 TEU	2008	184 m	Wärtsilä - 6RTA62U	11.8	D
1485	VALENCIA EXPRESS IMO 9108130	2,400 TEU	1996	216 m	Sulzer - 7RTA72U	11.8	D
1486	MAJESTIC IMO 9694438	2,239 TEU	2015	189 m	MAN - 6G60ME-C9	11.8	D
1487	MSC FALCON III IMO 9299032	2,478 TEU	2004	208 m	Hitachi - 7 L70MC-C	11.9	D
1488	MSC CLAUDIA IMO 9113446	1,205 TEU	1996	159 m	H. CEGIELSKI-POZNAN S.A. 8 S 50 MC	11.9	D
1489	SEATRADE GREEN IMO 9810915	2,268 TEU	2019	185 m	MAN - 6G60ME-C9	11.9	D
1490	ANTIBES EXPRESS IMO 9243186	3,237 TEU	2002	243 m	HSD ENGINE CO. LTD 8K80MC-C	11.9	D
1491	VENTO DI SCIROCCO IMO 9305908	1,560 TEU	2003	184 m	MAN - 7S50MC-C	11.9	D
1492	UBENA IMO 9690078	2,268 TEU	2016	185 m	MAN - 5G60ME-C9	11.9	D
1493	MIEKE SCHULTE IMO 9694426	2,339 TEU	2015	189 m	MAN - 6G60ME-C9	11.9	D
1494	CHIQUITA TRADER IMO 9304760	2,490 TEU	2005	212 m	Sulzer - 7RTA72U-B	12.0	D
1495	CHARM C IMO 9383259	2,500 TEU	2009	209 m	Wärtsilä - 7RT-flex68	12.0	D
1496	CMA CGM RED IMO 9690107	2,259 TEU	2016	185 m	Doosan - 5G60ME-C9	12.0	D
1497	CMA CGM DAVAO IMO 9347293	1,819 TEU	2008	186 m	Hyundai - 6 L70MC-C	12.0	D
1498	ECO LEVANT IMO 9985954	13,684	2024	148 m	MAN-B&W 5S50ME-C9-LGIM	12.0	D
1499	NORA MAERSK IMO 9192478	2,240 TEU	2000	199 m	Sulzer - 7RTA84C	12.1	D
1500	SHIBA IMO 9270646	2,200 TEU	2010	187 m	MAN - 6 L 70 MC	12.1	D

Page 30 of 41 — 2,034 vessels

← Prev Next →

Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.