Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,230 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
14.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+59% higher
E

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1201 HARBOUR PIONEER
IMO 9572757
19,122 2010
14.2
E
1202 ORIS TRINITY
IMO 9438169
13,121 2009
14.2
E
1203 HINCH SPIRIT
IMO 9508940
13,965 2009
14.3
E
1204 KOSOVA
IMO 9323792
37,320 2007
14.3
E
1205 CHEMICAL SAILOR
IMO 9804875
12,520 2019
14.3
E
1206 EKFJORD
IMO 9356622
17,006 2009
14.3
E
1207 FURUHOLMEN
IMO 9553397
17,091 2010
14.3
E
1208 FRANK
IMO 9371787
17,998 2008
14.3
E
1209 CHEMICAL MARINER
IMO 9558971
14,301 2010
14.3
E
1210 MORINA THERESA
IMO 9243382
16,882 2002
14.4
E
1211 SCOT BAYERN
IMO 9255828
8,234 2003
14.4
E
1212 SOLAR ALICE
IMO 9887384
24,621 2021
14.4
E
1213 GIANNA
IMO 9428360
49,999 2009
14.5
E
1214 NGOL OKAVANGO
IMO 9827994
13,498 2019
14.5
E
1215 NQ ROSA
IMO 9304318
8,807 2004
14.6
E
1216 SEN ARCHE
IMO 9443061
8,956 2008
14.6
E
1217 HARBOUR FOUNTAIN
IMO 9473107
16,929 2008
14.6
E
1218 YM MIRANDA
IMO 9554755
12,933 2013
14.6
E
1219 ORIS SYNERGY
IMO 9388211
13,091 2008
14.6
E
1220 IRIS THERESA
IMO 9873254
12,602 2020
14.6
E
1221 HARBOUR EXPRESS
IMO 9418822
20,522 2011
14.6
E
1222 BELLIS THERESA
IMO 9192375
15,200 2000
14.7
E
1223 ASKHOLMEN
IMO 9436381
16,801 2007
14.7
E
1224 CHEMICAL EXPLORER
IMO 9820427
12,643 2018
14.7
E
1225 GOLDEN DAISY
IMO 9878008
34,810 2015
14.8
E
1226 WICKY SPIRIT
IMO 9404388
13,945 2008
14.9
E
1227 AWH ALMA
IMO 9486166
17,055 2009
14.9
E
1228 GRETA K
IMO 9800374
24,768 2016
14.9
E
1229 SALTSTRAUM
IMO 9854466
10,249 2020
14.9
E
1230 W NORTH
IMO 9272735
8,501 2003
14.9
E
1231 HARBOUR FIRST
IMO 9473119
16,894 2011
14.9
E
1232 ATLANTIC TWIN
IMO 9341328
15,212 2008
14.9
E
1233 YM SATURN
IMO 9362138
15,988 2007
15.0
E
1234 YM JUPITER
IMO 9291597
15,995 2007
15.0
E
1235 HARBOUR FASHION
IMO 9473080
16,878 2011
15.0
E
1236 LIVATYA
IMO 9291444
8,817 2004
15.0
E
1237 NEW SPIRIT
IMO 9337872
12,970 2008
15.0
E
1238 WINTER SUN
IMO 9317028
9,517 2005
15.0
E
1239 HELEN
IMO 9263136
21,183 2002
15.0
E
1240 MISSISSIPPI STAR
IMO 9527623
13,054 2010
15.1
E
1241 SONGA ORION
IMO 9831024
17,916 2020
15.1
E
1242 TANKER BEE 11
IMO 9356646
8,019 2007
15.1
E
1243 TINERFE
IMO 9498107
17,540 2009
15.1
E
1244 KIRKEHOLMEN
IMO 9553402
17,136 2010
15.2
E
1245 RIVER OAK
IMO 9438157
13,133 2007
15.2
E
1246 KARLICA
IMO 9220354
12,000 2000
15.2
E
1247 ROSSI A. DESGAGNES
IMO 9804435
14,919 2019
15.2
E
1248 OWL 1
IMO 9439369
13,053 2007
15.3
E
1249 TELLUS
IMO 9321615
9,181 2006
15.3
E
1250 SCORPIUS
IMO 9318228
11,249 2006
15.3
E
Page 25 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.