Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,079 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
11.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
+25% higher
D

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1051 STOLT SUN
IMO 9149512
22,198 2000
11.3
D
1052 HYDE PARK
IMO 9725861
19,994 2017
11.3
D
1053 CLYDE
IMO 9298416
12,984 2005
11.3
D
1054 MT BANDIRMA
IMO 9120243
9,584 1996
11.3
D
1055 ORIENTAL DAPHNE
IMO 9882736
16,267 2020
11.4
D
1056 PRABHU LAL
IMO 9416044
19,859 2008
11.4
D
1057 TG ARIES
IMO 9485849
19,956 2012
11.4
D
1058 STOLT EFFORT
IMO 9178202
37,155 1999
11.4
D
1059 FG ROTTERDAM
IMO 9485863
19,995 2012
11.4
D
1060 CHEM NEW YORK
IMO 9705732
19,994 2014
11.4
D
1061 DAMSGAARD
IMO 9724453
19,996 2016
11.5
D
1062 TG VIRGO
IMO 9416109
19,954 2009
11.5
D
1063 THERESA GALAXY
IMO 9317195
19,988 2005
11.5
D
1064 GINGA SUNBIRD
IMO 9926568
25,160 2022
11.5
D
1065 UNDA
IMO 9511234
9,087 2009
11.5
D
1066 CHEM HOUSTON
IMO 9705720
19,997 2014
11.5
D
1067 CYGNI
IMO 9427990
14,374 2007
11.6
D
1068 SOLAR SKYLER
IMO 9877640
25,039 2020
11.6
D
1069 RICHMOND PARK
IMO 9624782
21,313 2012
11.6
D
1070 HURON
IMO 9457878
21,224 2010
11.6
D
1071 LOEVSTAKKEN
IMO 9724441
19,995 2015
11.6
D
1072 SIGAIA THERESA
IMO 9748710
12,661 2015
11.6
D
1073 TRISTAR NATASHA
IMO 9721748
19,801 2016
11.6
D
1074 GOLDEN MAPLE
IMO 1055868
18,406 2025
11.6
D
1075 GULLFJELLET
IMO 9724439
19,975 2015
11.6
D
1076 FAIRCHEM ALDEBARAN
IMO 9552666
19,697 2017
11.7
D
1077 CUMBRIAN
IMO 9298404
12,921 2004
11.7
D
1078 MOYRA
IMO 9271999
19,806 2005
11.7
D
1079 THUN LUNDY
IMO 9837872
18,684 2020
11.7
D
1080 TRANS SEA
IMO 9956927
12,598 2023
11.8
D
1081 MED ATLANTIC
IMO 9410533
26,234 2011
11.8
D
1082 WINDSOR
IMO 9542130
19,997 2010
11.8
D
1083 SONGA POLARIS
IMO 9457749
25,145 2011
11.8
D
1084 CHEMICAL MASTER
IMO 9558957
14,298 2009
11.8
D
1085 XANTHIA
IMO 9246152
17,031 2003
11.8
D
1086 EVA FUKUOKA
IMO 9989182
25,298 2024
11.8
D
1087 SOLERO
IMO 9428085
19,992 2009
11.8
D
1088 TERNSUND
IMO 9722390
14,847 2016
11.8
D
1089 ARKOS
IMO 9286827
13,700 2004
11.9
D
1090 STOLT STREAM
IMO 9169940
22,199 2000
11.9
D
1091 LATANA
IMO 9186352
15,990 2000
11.9
D
1092 THUN LONDON
IMO 9828986
18,684 2019
11.9
D
1093 YC AZALEA
IMO 9272682
19,997 2004
11.9
D
1094 OLYMPIC SPIRIT
IMO 9327097
24,035 2005
11.9
D
1095 CHEM MERCURY
IMO 9815276
19,971 2018
11.9
D
1096 MAGENTA RAY
IMO 9829722
19,998 2019
11.9
D
1097 CETI
IMO 9427988
14,353 2007
11.9
D
1098 AMAGI GALAXY
IMO 9490313
26,199 2010
12.0
D
1099 CARPE DIEM
IMO 9428815
25,175 2010
12.0
D
1100 QD SUMMER
IMO 9363845
19,994 2008
12.0
D
Page 22 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.