Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,181 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
5.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
+6% higher
D

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1151 ENERGY AFRODITE
IMO 9942304
49,812 2022
5.3
D
1152 RAINBOW SPIRIT
IMO 9837171
129,734 2020
5.3
D
1153 MINERVA LIBRA
IMO 9317951
116,779 2007
5.3
D
1154 FLAGSHIP TULIP
IMO 9594896
74,986 2013
5.3
D
1155 LIA
IMO 9417751
73,723 2005
5.3
D
1156 KLARA
IMO 9405904
51,755 2006
5.3
D
1157 PRESIDENT I
IMO 9312444
64,999 2007
5.3
D
1158 MARAN CURRENT
IMO 9843924
129,801 2020
5.3
D
1159 PACIFIC MOONSTONE
IMO 9892078
50,192 2021
5.3
D
1160 SAFEEN ELONA
IMO 9488011
105,258 2010
5.3
D
1161 MARAN TIDE
IMO 9843912
129,632 2020
5.3
D
1162 SILVER ZOE
IMO 9692325
49,635 2015
5.3
D
1163 MAISTROS
IMO 9407847
73,334 2006
5.3
D
1164 BANDA
IMO 9337406
105,576 2007
5.3
D
1165 HEATHER KNUTSEN
IMO 9273064
148,644 2005
5.3
D
1166 SILVER LINDA
IMO 9683415
49,746 2015
5.3
D
1167 HISTRIA NARVI
IMO 9800829
40,000 2025
5.4
D
1168 HELLAS AVATAR
IMO 9722613
49,997 2015
5.4
D
1169 FLAGSHIP SAGE
IMO 9471329
74,158 2007
5.4
D
1170 HAFNIA LIONESS
IMO 9675509
49,999 2014
5.4
D
1171 LVM WARRIOR
IMO 9694189
49,997 2015
5.4
D
1172 STI QUEENS
IMO 9707273
49,990 2015
5.4
D
1173 OCEAN NISA
IMO 9553749
49,999 2022
5.4
D
1174 NEAPOLIS
IMO 9792199
73,937 2018
5.4
D
1175 ALFIOS
IMO 9884241
49,999 2020
5.4
D
1176 JOROPO
IMO 9380087
47,410 2009
5.4
D
1177 BLUE SEA
IMO 9413028
105,416 2006
5.4
D
1178 JAG PRACHI
IMO 9590723
51,486 2013
5.5
D
1179 SOVEREIGN
IMO 9390939
74,998 2006
5.5
D
1180 STI REGINA
IMO 9686728
49,990 2014
5.5
D
1181 OLYMPIC FLAG
IMO 9271341
155,009 2001
5.5
D
1182 ENERGY APOLLO
IMO 9891438
49,812 2020
5.5
D
1183 OKEE JOHN T
IMO 9311036
53,712 2006
5.5
D
1184 SILVER HANNAH
IMO 9682409
49,680 2014
5.5
D
1185 SILVER VALERIE
IMO 9682320
49,715 2014
5.5
D
1186 HISTRIA ATLAS
IMO 9800790
40,000 2019
5.5
D
1187 PARTRIDGE PACIFIC
IMO 9960291
49,808 2023
5.5
D
1188 KRITI SAMARIA
IMO 9329409
105,865 2007
5.5
D
1189 KRITI JOURNEY
IMO 9440538
112,723 2010
5.5
D
1190 LARVIK
IMO 9307346
61,213 2006
5.5
D
1191 STI MAGNETIC
IMO 9829485
47,499 2017
5.5
D
1192 DAS
IMO 9439802
50,261 2009
5.5
D
1193 ABDIAS NASCIMENTO
IMO 9453896
157,055 2017
5.5
D
1194 BURGAN
IMO 9656022
46,330 2014
5.5
D
1195 YUME
IMO 9459230
45,994 2010
5.5
D
1196 NAVE JUPITER
IMO 9657038
50,240 2011
5.5
D
1197 SOLAR KATHERINE
IMO 9882396
49,990 2020
5.5
D
1198 IPANEMA STREET
IMO 9402770
47,378 2006
5.5
D
1199 TUVA KNUTSEN
IMO 9887968
152,744 2021
5.6
D
1200 STI GALATA
IMO 9785689
51,546 2015
5.6
D
Page 24 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.