Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,731 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
14.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
+177% higher
E

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 556C 557D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 279 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

53
Q4
60
'27 Q1
57
'27 Q2
37
'27 Q3
45
'27 Q4
71
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
34
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,874 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,757 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,371 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,195 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

411
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,668–3,970M
capex range, top measure per vessel (411 of 411 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.49 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1701 RINELLA M
IMO 9351529
40,441 2006
12.7
E
1702 T PROCYON
IMO 9569499
19,101 2021
12.8
E
1703 HAI GONG YOU 309
IMO 9153214
12,924 1998
12.8
E
1704 STARLIGHT II
IMO 9377652
37,847 2007
12.8
E
1705 STEN AURORA
IMO 9318565
16,596 2007
12.9
E
1706 EASTERN NYMPHAEA
IMO 9827994
13,498 2019
12.9
E
1707 ASTREA
IMO 9488839
11,215 2010
12.9
E
1708 STEN HIDRA
IMO 9358931
16,670 2007
12.9
E
1709 THE CHIEF
IMO 9492361
14,953 2013
13.0
E
1710 STEN BERGEN
IMO 9407988
16,655 2009
13.0
E
1711 ARDENZA
IMO 9377195
15,994 2009
13.1
E
1712 GIJON KNUTSEN
IMO 9313527
38,150 2006
13.1
E
1713 SPECTRUM
IMO 9535412
21,999 2009
13.2
E
1714 STEN BALTIC
IMO 9307671
16,607 2005
13.3
E
1715 ANNA MARIA P
IMO 9288368
47,278 2005
13.3
E
1716 STEN SUOMI
IMO 9378723
16,619 2008
13.5
E
1717 JIN ZHOU WAN
IMO 9802580
13,265 2017
13.6
E
1718 BRO NUUK
IMO 9323819
16,631 2008
13.7
E
1719 NEW AMORGOS
IMO 9370836
107,510 2008
13.7
E
1720 HAI GONG YOU 306
IMO 9150614
16,376 1999
13.8
E
1721 IEVOLI GOLD
IMO 9404376
17,011 2009
13.9
E
1722 STEN NORDIC
IMO 9351567
16,657 2005
13.9
E
1723 STEN TRITON
IMO 9322695
16,564 2007
14.0
E
1724 DIVINA
IMO 9377200
15,994 2009
14.0
E
1725 STEN PONTOS
IMO 9323584
16,427 2007
14.0
E
1726 BARBARICA
IMO 9383443
18,818 2008
14.1
E
1727 STAVFJORD
IMO 9401544
16,635 2009
14.1
E
1728 STENBERG
IMO 9283978
16,626 2003
14.1
E
1729 STEN FJELL
IMO 9460241
18,561 2010
14.1
E
1730 ASPHALT TERANGA
IMO 9263942
9,230 2005
14.2
E
1731 T.ADALYN
IMO 9830305
14,787 2019
14.2
E
1732 LEOPOLD
IMO 9173032
7,076 1998
14.3
E
1733 NEW LEGEND
IMO 9230505
159,435 2002
14.3
E
1734 FURE SKAGEN
IMO 9362152
16,958 2008
14.6
E
1735 STEN ARNOLD
IMO 9371610
16,578 2008
14.6
E
1736 STEN MOSTER
IMO 9341184
16,670 2006
14.6
E
1737 ARROW STAR 1
IMO 9435313
13,030 2007
14.6
E
1738 TIGRIS
IMO 9443841
12,919 2008
14.7
E
1739 STEN NEPTUN
IMO 9322712
16,511 2007
14.8
E
1740 STAV VIKING
IMO 9401556
16,628 2009
14.9
E
1741 CANNETO M
IMO 9359583
21,600 2008
14.9
E
1742 SRIWANGI III
IMO 9430739
13,954 2007
15.3
E
1743 DATTILO M
IMO 9333474
21,600 2006
15.3
E
1744 PATALYA
IMO 9305180
16,664 2005
15.4
E
1745 VULCANELLO M.
IMO 9337779
11,288 2006
15.7
E
1746 NORSIGN BREEZE
IMO 9365477
16,748 2006
15.8
E
1747 RUBIKON 78
IMO 9312078
16,642 2005
15.8
E
1748 STEN POSEIDON
IMO 9322700
16,534 2007
15.9
E
1749 NAV DURGA
IMO 9260005
39,634 2003
15.9
E
1750 PATARA
IMO 9344423
16,979 2007
16.1
E
Page 35 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.