Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#550 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
9.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
-35% greener
B

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 223 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

45
Q4
39
'27 Q1
40
'27 Q2
34
'27 Q3
32
'27 Q4
30
'28 Q1
35
'28 Q2
28
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 648 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
501 AAL KOBE
IMO 9498444
32,043 2012
8.5
B
502 ERKUL S
IMO 9177789
13,347 1999
8.6
B
503 AAL DALIAN
IMO 9498470
32,190 2013
8.6
B
504 HOSEI SAKURA
IMO 9673197
16,949 2014
8.6
B
505 FORZA ROMA
IMO 9217618
32,267 2000
8.6
B
506 STELLINA
IMO 9674933
26,051 2014
8.6
B
508 YAGIZ D
IMO 1051707
8,623 2024
8.6
B
507 SEREN
IMO 9458391
28,085 2011
8.6
B
509 WM CRYSTAL
IMO 9660152
16,956 2013
8.6
B
511 SAPIENZA
IMO 9413066
18,917 2009
8.7
B
512 MISJE LOTUS
IMO 9967550
5,310 2024
8.7
B
510 DANILA BAGROV
IMO 9458420
28,309 2012
8.7
B
513 FULDABORG
IMO 9559092
14,592 2012
8.7
B
514 SIDER ATLANTIC
IMO 9618795
25,469 2011
8.7
B
515 SUNNY MARK
IMO 9414955
21,639 2007
8.7
B
516 FENG HUANG SONG
IMO 9416757
27,300 2009
8.7
B
518 LADY DORIS
IMO 9458418
28,154 2012
8.7
B
517 MISJE VERDE
IMO 9927433
5,310 2023
8.7
B
519 LILAC ROLLER
IMO 9509712
33,200 2011
8.7
B
520 ADAM ASNYK
IMO 9432115
30,322 2009
8.8
B
521 SIDER KING
IMO 9615913
25,467 2011
8.8
B
522 VERTOM ANNE MARIT
IMO 9938755
7,280 2024
8.8
B
523 BOCS BREMEN
IMO 9438389
34,065 2011
8.8
B
524 SOLITAIRE I
IMO 9227962
24,997 2000
8.8
B
525 CHIPOL TAIAN
IMO 9509621
33,217 2010
8.8
B
526 HOSEI LIBERTY
IMO 9640358
14,017 2012
8.8
B
528 CHIPOLBROK ATLANTIC
IMO 9731377
31,661 2016
8.8
B
527 PERMATA N
IMO 9636137
13,428 2012
8.8
B
529 VERTOM TULA
IMO 1027706
7,308 2025
8.8
B
530 BAHRI DIRIYAH
IMO 9498482
32,241 2014
8.8
B
532 ULUSOY-8
IMO 9458250
22,303 2008
8.9
B
531 ENVAR
IMO 9098696
5,304 2005
8.9
B
533 VERTOM PATTY
IMO 9938729
7,281 2022
8.9
B
534 NORD LION
IMO 9673173
16,954 2014
8.9
B
536 NAVIN KESTREL
IMO 9381811
7,949 2006
8.9
B
535 MISJE FLORA
IMO 9950698
5,310 2024
8.9
B
538 GREY FOX
IMO 9594470
33,290 2011
8.9
B
537 ANNETTA
IMO 9396543
11,732 2007
8.9
B
539 GOLDEN BIRD
IMO 8517580
12,342 1986
8.9
B
540 AAL MELBOURNE
IMO 9498456
32,128 2013
8.9
B
541 GLEN A
IMO 9015046
4,911 1990
8.9
B
543 XIA MEN ZE AN
IMO 9638628
27,264 2013
9.0
B
542 SIDER LIU
IMO 9699725
14,632 2015
9.0
B
544 AAL GUNSAN
IMO 9393589
25,747 2010
9.0
B
547 KRASZEWSKI
IMO 9432153
30,300 2011
9.0
B
546 GEMINI CAPO
IMO 9662485
10,813 2012
9.0
B
545 TAAGBORG
IMO 9546461
21,338 2013
9.0
B
548 THORCO LIVA
IMO 9643623
16,901 2012
9.0
B
549 BINNUR C
IMO 9261023
31,829 2003
9.1
B
550 HALIT BEY
IMO 9511375
12,046 2008
9.1
B
Page 11 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.