Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,457 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
5.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
+14% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2451 SINOP
IMO 9644184
63,200 2013
5.4
D
2452 ARUNA CIHAN
IMO 9543756
57,411 2011
5.4
D
2453 ERNEST VINBERG
IMO 9707649
63,411 2015
5.4
D
2454 HAATO
IMO 9589786
61,472 2011
5.4
D
2455 CAPTAIN D LEMPESIS
IMO 9364801
53,466 2005
5.4
D
2456 NEW ISLAND
IMO 9258349
47,304 2002
5.4
D
2457 TUNSIN
IMO 9768954
37,657 2017
5.4
D
2458 NJ JUPITER
IMO 9302841
55,947 2005
5.4
D
2459 ENJOY PROSPERITY
IMO 9545728
56,726 2011
5.4
D
2460 ASTRO SANISTRA
IMO 9805661
60,365 2018
5.4
D
2461 AG VALOR
IMO 9312327
28,510 2004
5.4
D
2462 OMURTAG
IMO 9605839
56,709 2012
5.4
D
2463 FEDERAL DELTA
IMO 9805271
34,492 2018
5.4
D
2464 LMZ TITAN
IMO 9466908
56,779 2012
5.4
D
2465 CL HEIDI
IMO 9720952
63,571 2016
5.4
D
2466 LALE S
IMO 9603051
57,970 2011
5.4
D
2467 NEW SIHAM
IMO 9197882
31,025 1999
5.4
D
2468 LADY SPERANZA
IMO 9200574
16,870 2000
5.4
D
2469 DODO
IMO 9662320
39,017 2012
5.4
D
2470 FUJI HARMONY
IMO 9913999
39,989 2022
5.4
D
2471 ROSALIA
IMO 9696826
39,907 2016
5.4
D
2472 FEDERAL NAGARA
IMO 9805257
34,492 2018
5.4
D
2473 ROOSTER
IMO 9723942
37,896 2016
5.4
D
2474 VIVA GLOBUS
IMO 9251315
52,300 2002
5.4
D
2475 FEDERAL SHIMANTO
IMO 9218404
32,787 2001
5.4
D
2476 MURGASH
IMO 9996965
32,192 2025
5.4
D
2477 LI DA CHANG
IMO 9547817
56,316 2010
5.4
D
2478 LUGANO
IMO 9132662
28,350 1996
5.4
D
2479 DSM FERRO
IMO 9236092
50,320 2001
5.4
D
2480 FEDERAL MONTREAL
IMO 9838474
34,492 2019
5.4
D
2481 SEA MOON
IMO 9228227
28,494 2002
5.4
D
2482 BAO RUI LING
IMO 9617258
47,521 2014
5.4
D
2483 DENSA SEAL
IMO 9649110
37,586 2011
5.4
D
2484 NORDLOIRE
IMO 9596026
37,212 2013
5.4
D
2485 FEDERAL SATSUKI
IMO 9515101
35,885 2012
5.4
D
2486 OUTRIDER
IMO 9701061
33,190 2016
5.4
D
2487 FEDERAL FRONTIER
IMO 9866768
34,492 2021
5.4
D
2488 JNS LAKE
IMO 1039357
40,489 2024
5.4
D
2489 QING HUA SHAN
IMO 9741528
63,457 2016
5.4
D
2490 C LION
IMO 9425916
58,117 2010
5.4
D
2491 TAURUS
IMO 9273818
76,616 2004
5.4
D
2492 ABU AL ABYAD
IMO 9494022
57,369 2011
5.4
D
2493 CS JADEN
IMO 9660061
38,101 2013
5.4
D
2494 CAIPIRINHA
IMO 9714769
38,668 2015
5.4
D
2495 BERGE RISHIRI
IMO 9713222
35,172 2017
5.4
D
2496 CETUS BOWHEAD
IMO 9670755
43,433 2015
5.4
D
2497 MILAS
IMO 9279379
50,341 2004
5.4
D
2498 SEASTAR AVALON
IMO 9755921
36,184 2017
5.4
D
2499 JIN CHAO
IMO 9691412
63,469 2014
5.4
D
2500 RUBINA
IMO 9725512
39,959 2018
5.4
D
Page 50 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.