Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,773 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
13.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.89)
+39% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 461 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,485 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.22
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1751 ANNABA
IMO 9306201
1,574 TEU 2006
13.8
E
1752 MSC AKITETA II
IMO 9220847
2,226 TEU 2001
13.8
E
1753 MSC NORDEROOG F
IMO 9256315
1,300 TEU 2004
13.8
E
1754 JOANNA BORCHARD
IMO 1016563
17,495 2025
13.8
E
1755 LASALLE
IMO 9349368
2,474 TEU 2006
13.8
E
1756 NEWYORKER
IMO 9209104
2,506 TEU 2001
13.8
E
1757 KAWA BUDAPEST
IMO 9379571
1,060 TEU 2006
13.8
E
1758 MERATUS JAYAKARTA
IMO 9305879
2,474 TEU 2005
13.9
E
1759 MSC LEANDRA V
IMO 9313943
4,196 TEU 2007
13.9
E
1760 NORTH
IMO 9491501
1,349 TEU 2011
13.9
E
1761 SLS AZURE
IMO 9155377
1,718 TEU 2000
13.9
E
1762 SC MEDFORD
IMO 9275103
1,200 TEU 2004
13.9
E
1763 MSC TAMISHKA F
IMO 9358905
1,300 TEU 2007
13.9
E
1764 MSC AUBE F
IMO 9360283
1,060 TEU 2005
13.9
E
1765 TUKUMA ARCTICA
IMO 9822865
2,150 TEU 2020
13.9
E
1766 NORDIC ISTRIA
IMO 9474383
1,085 TEU 2011
13.9
E
1767 MSC BAHRAIN II
IMO 9359301
1,440 TEU 2006
13.9
E
1768 MARLA BULL
IMO 9932945
1,900 TEU 2022
14.0
E
1769 MARSA PRIDE
IMO 9301445
2,556 TEU 2005
14.0
E
1770 AS SABRINA
IMO 9387463
1,700 TEU 2006
14.0
E
1771 MSC AMY
IMO 9242651
1,768 TEU 2002
14.0
E
1772 MSC SUEDEROOG F
IMO 9256327
1,300 TEU 2005
14.0
E
1773 JEAN PIERRE A
IMO 9379351
1,604 TEU 2007
14.0
E
1774 ELBINSEL
IMO 9977426
20,150 2024
14.0
E
1775 EF EMMA
IMO 9357808
1,706 TEU 2008
14.1
E
1776 MARTI SPIRIT
IMO 9477347
1,350 TEU 2010
14.1
E
1777 FREDERIK
IMO 9328637
1,200 TEU 2005
14.1
E
1778 CIELO DI RABAT
IMO 9141792
2,061 TEU 1997
14.1
E
1779 VENTO DI MELTEMI
IMO 9242297
1,170 TEU 2002
14.1
E
1780 NEVZAT KALKAVAN
IMO 9365867
1,849 TEU 2011
14.1
E
1781 ELBELLA
IMO 9312640
1,740 TEU 2006
14.2
E
1782 MSC TIANA F
IMO 9108398
1,129 TEU 1996
14.2
E
1783 MSC KUWAIT III
IMO 9226413
2,462 TEU 2001
14.2
E
1784 ERASMUS GOAL
IMO 9626558
1,805 TEU 2013
14.2
E
1785 NEPTUNE MATUA
IMO 9670119
2,190 TEU 2015
14.2
E
1786 PORTSMOUTH
IMO 9302437
2,478 TEU 2004
14.2
E
1787 UAFL RACER
IMO 9334818
1,740 TEU 2007
14.2
E
1788 APL SAIPAN
IMO 9239850
1,638 TEU 2002
14.3
E
1789 DOUCE FRANCE
IMO 9845661
2,200 TEU 2020
14.3
E
1790 CHIQUITA MERCHANT
IMO 9344631
1,819 TEU 2007
14.3
E
1791 ESPERANCE
IMO 9491484
1,349 TEU 2011
14.3
E
1792 RAQUEL S
IMO 9515591
1,577 TEU 2009
14.3
E
1793 DJANET
IMO 9845063
1,500 TEU 2020
14.3
E
1794 VALENCIA EXPRESS
IMO 9108130
2,400 TEU 1996
14.3
E
1795 MARINA L
IMO 9431331
1,300 TEU 2009
14.3
E
1796 TRADEWIND
IMO 9367944
907 TEU 2007
14.3
E
1797 CMA CGM FORT ST PIERRE
IMO 9261891
2,226 TEU 2003
14.4
E
1798 ALEXANDER B
IMO 9328649
1,200 TEU 2006
14.4
E
1799 CIRTA
IMO 9845051
1,500 TEU 2020
14.4
E
1800 AS PENELOPE
IMO 9294537
2,572 TEU 2005
14.5
E
Page 36 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.