Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#644 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-15% greener
C

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.79
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
600 BOW EXPLORER
IMO 9828211
38,235 2020
8.2
C
602 MARINER A
IMO 9288954
40,099 2005
8.2
C
604 MTM SANTOS
IMO 9712606
22,396 2015
8.2
C
603 CONTI GREENLAND
IMO 9391397
37,599 2008
8.2
C
606 GINGA THRESHER
IMO 9829746
25,174 2019
8.2
C
608 STOLT PONDO
IMO 9374521
33,232 2007
8.2
C
605 ATA VOYAGER
IMO 9408360
9,531 2009
8.2
C
607 STOLT MAPLE
IMO 9764491
32,825 2017
8.2
C
609 STOLT SNELAND
IMO 9352212
44,080 2008
8.2
C
610 MTM PENANG
IMO 9712591
22,413 2015
8.2
C
612 GOLD TRADER I
IMO 9907017
33,343 2019
8.2
C
611 STOLT APAL
IMO 9719240
32,798 2016
8.2
C
613 BOW LYNX
IMO 9989194
25,914 2024
8.2
C
615 HAFNIA AMAZONITE
IMO 9719769
37,596 2015
8.3
C
614 EDGE GALAXY
IMO 9788954
19,946 2017
8.3
C
616 TIVY GOLD
IMO 9251559
39,999 2003
8.3
C
617 KAMUI GALAXY
IMO 9942653
26,400 2022
8.3
C
619 SERENA M
IMO 9444508
39,710 2010
8.3
C
618 JANE
IMO 9364588
51,506 2008
8.3
C
620 BOW LION
IMO 9952177
26,021 2023
8.3
C
621 HACI KEMAL KA
IMO 9315757
37,627 2003
8.3
C
622 MALBEC LEGEND
IMO 9732814
37,596 2016
8.3
C
623 SC SCORPIO
IMO 9801079
40,964 2017
8.3
C
625 POLKA
IMO 9422641
37,759 2009
8.3
C
624 RAMANDA
IMO 9739812
17,994 2018
8.3
C
627 KRITI JADE
IMO 9391311
50,563 2008
8.3
C
626 STOLT FOCUS
IMO 9214305
37,467 2001
8.3
C
628 CHEM STELLAR
IMO 9731755
25,196 2016
8.3
C
629 FAIRCHEM VALOR
IMO 9791195
22,292 2019
8.3
C
630 CHEMROUTE PEGASUS
IMO 9566162
26,153 2012
8.3
C
634 SLOGEN
IMO 9733375
19,996 2016
8.4
C
633 FAIRCHEM ANGEL
IMO 9809394
25,245 2020
8.4
C
632 BOCHEM MUMBAI
IMO 9565637
33,636 2006
8.4
C
631 DIDIMON
IMO 9288772
37,432 2005
8.4
C
637 FENICUSA M
IMO 9381500
40,036 2008
8.4
C
636 VIVA
IMO 9156539
16,116 1999
8.4
C
635 BOW CARDINAL
IMO 9114244
37,446 1997
8.4
C
638 KRITI ADMIRAL
IMO 9314870
37,266 2007
8.4
C
639 NAVIG8 UNIVERSE
IMO 9489106
45,313 2013
8.4
C
641 MTM KOBE
IMO 9776456
21,183 2018
8.4
C
640 FAIRCHEM PATHFINDER
IMO 9975301
26,300 2024
8.4
C
643 SOLAR AILENE
IMO 9877664
25,039 2021
8.4
C
642 EALDOR
IMO 9282924
20,810 2003
8.4
C
644 ANKARA
IMO 9253777
40,081 2004
8.4
C
645 SOLAR SHARNA
IMO 9877614
25,039 2020
8.4
C
646 STOLT TUCAN
IMO 9811127
15,081 2019
8.5
C
647 BAGHEERA
IMO 9670949
39,999 2014
8.5
C
650 NAVIG8 CONSTELLATION
IMO 9489118
45,281 2013
8.5
C
649 TSUKUBA GALAXY
IMO 9796834
26,175 2020
8.5
C
648 CB BALTIC
IMO 9851701
37,874 2020
8.5
C
Page 13 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.