Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,941 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
17.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
+79% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 313B 411C 707D 600E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 441 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

97
Q3
96
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
81
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,606 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,426 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1901 BAKKAFOSS
IMO 9429194
1,025 TEU 2009
17.9
E
1902 MSC CHARLOTTE
IMO 9330238
1,092 TEU 2007
18.0
E
1903 CACHALOT
IMO 9212022
1,216 TEU 2000
18.0
E
1904 HANNA
IMO 9376048
868 TEU 2008
18.0
E
1905 AKACIA
IMO 9315020
1,008 TEU 2005
18.1
E
1906 MEDKON MERSIN
IMO 9430040
232 TEU 2008
18.1
E
1907 NETA A.
IMO 9412531
1,025 TEU 2011
18.1
E
1908 WES GESA
IMO 9504061
1,000 TEU 2012
18.1
E
1909 CAPE FULMAR
IMO 9359313
1,440 TEU 2007
18.2
E
1910 SKALAR
IMO 9458975
1,000 TEU 2012
18.2
E
1911 SAMSKIP AMINA
IMO 9448683
1,085 TEU 2011
18.3
E
1912 PAN GG
IMO 9236286
1,155 TEU 2002
18.4
E
1913 ELBWATER
IMO 9504073
1,000 TEU 2012
18.4
E
1914 MSC EDITH II
IMO 9169029
1,388 TEU 1998
18.4
E
1915 HENNEKE RAMBOW
IMO 9354430
868 TEU 2007
18.5
E
1916 CMA CGM EAST
IMO 9396622
1,338 TEU 2008
18.5
E
1917 MED DENIZLI
IMO 9106493
1,055 TEU 1996
18.5
E
1918 ELBSAILOR
IMO 9448695
1,085 TEU 2012
18.6
E
1919 MED CERKEZKOY
IMO 9147215
1,076 TEU 1998
18.6
E
1920 MED URLA
IMO 9160920
847 TEU 1997
18.6
E
1921 CONTSHIP ERA
IMO 9507702
1,100 TEU 2009
18.6
E
1922 MEDKON MAX
IMO 9347786
890 TEU 2006
18.6
E
1923 MAYFIELD
IMO 9216353
1,216 TEU 2001
18.7
E
1924 CONTSHIP JET
IMO 9348625
1,267 TEU 2007
18.7
E
1925 MSC LEVANTE F
IMO 9330264
1,114 TEU 2006
18.7
E
1926 HELMUT
IMO 9354466
868 TEU 2006
18.7
E
1927 CONTSHIP ECO
IMO 9492751
700 TEU 2008
18.8
E
1928 HANSA MUNKSUND
IMO 9429223
1,025 TEU 2012
18.8
E
1929 LYNN
IMO 9295531
869 TEU 2007
18.8
E
1930 BARBARA P
IMO 9144720
942 TEU 1997
18.8
E
1931 BALTIC WHALE
IMO 9354454
868 TEU 2006
18.9
E
1932 NOVA
IMO 9250098
966 TEU 2002
18.9
E
1933 WEC DE HOOGH
IMO 9315018
1,008 TEU 2005
19.0
E
1934 IDA RAMBOW
IMO 9354478
1,008 TEU 2007
19.0
E
1935 MEDKON CANAKKALE
IMO 9341964
698 TEU 2007
19.0
E
1936 ELBRUNNER
IMO 9395563
974 TEU 2009
19.0
E
1937 CHARLOTTA
IMO 9429209
877 TEU 2009
19.1
E
1938 JONA SOPHIE
IMO 9144718
942 TEU 1997
19.1
E
1939 ELBWAVE
IMO 9504035
1,000 TEU 2011
19.1
E
1940 BALLATA
IMO 9327578
1,118 TEU 2006
19.1
E
1941 MITO
IMO 9319571
1,118 TEU 2006
19.1
E
1942 GFS LYSA
IMO 9368730
1,338 TEU 2007
19.1
E
1943 ATLANTIC EXPRESS
IMO 9330850
1,114 TEU 2007
19.1
E
1944 MAUREN
IMO 9306251
1,118 TEU 2005
19.2
E
1945 WEC VAN RIJN
IMO 9315006
1,008 TEU 2005
19.2
E
1946 PHOENIX J
IMO 9504047
1,036 TEU 2010
19.3
E
1947 MSC AZURIT F
IMO 9403437
1,118 TEU 2008
19.3
E
1948 MSC ABIGAIL F
IMO 9330226
1,102 TEU 2006
19.3
E
1949 ISABELLA B
IMO 9483358
1,036 TEU 2012
19.3
E
1950 KILIA
IMO 9412517
1,025 TEU 2010
19.3
E
Page 39 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.