Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,852 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
19.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
+86% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,485 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.4
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1851 CMA CGM NADOR
IMO 9396696
1,000 TEU 2007
20.8
E
1852 HERCULES J
IMO 9430193
786 TEU 2009
20.8
E
1853 TUNADAL
IMO 9429235
880 TEU 2012
20.9
E
1854 MSC AZURIT F
IMO 9403437
1,080 TEU 2008
20.9
E
1855 RUTH
IMO 9376036
868 TEU 2008
20.9
E
1856 BALTIC SHEARWATER
IMO 9313228
1,600 TEU 2005
21.0
E
1857 WILHELM
IMO 9376050
868 TEU 2008
21.0
E
1858 DAGMAR
IMO 9354399
868 TEU 2006
21.0
E
1859 WEC CORNEILLE
IMO 9326940
862 TEU 2005
21.0
E
1860 X-PRESS SOUSSE
IMO 9354349
868 TEU 2006
21.0
E
1861 NEUENFELDE
IMO 9231846
868 TEU 2001
21.1
E
1862 JSP ROVER
IMO 9323467
804 TEU 2006
21.1
E
1863 EVI
IMO 9396634
1,338 TEU 2008
21.1
E
1864 MEDKON NLS
IMO 9390812
657 TEU 2006
21.1
E
1865 ELBTEAM
IMO 9429273
880 TEU 2012
21.1
E
1866 CONESTE
IMO 9252802
862 TEU 2003
21.1
E
1867 VEGA ALPHA
IMO 9301081
900 TEU 2005
21.1
E
1868 BIANCA RAMBOW
IMO 9297591
862 TEU 2004
21.1
E
1869 ATLANTIC GENEVA
IMO 9330848
1,100 TEU 2007
21.2
E
1870 BG EMERALD
IMO 9803704
955 TEU 2018
21.2
E
1871 SARA BORCHARD
IMO 9354428
868 TEU 2007
21.3
E
1872 ASTURIANO III
IMO 9406829
1,118 TEU 2007
21.3
E
1873 MASTERY D
IMO 9301201
900 TEU 2006
21.3
E
1874 PEYTON LYNN C
IMO 9295531
855 TEU 2007
21.3
E
1875 CARLOTA B
IMO 9404065
803 TEU 2007
21.3
E
1876 CONTSHIP VOW
IMO 9395599
1,100 TEU 2007
21.4
E
1877 QUEEN NM
IMO 9234991
868 TEU 2001
21.4
E
1878 PAVO J
IMO 9355458
850 TEU 2007
21.4
E
1879 IPIOS
IMO 9359117
1,100 TEU 2006
21.5
E
1880 JSP CARLA
IMO 9319868
750 TEU 2004
21.5
E
1881 WEC VAN RIJN
IMO 9315006
868 TEU 2005
21.5
E
1882 FALMOUTH
IMO 9266530
862 TEU 2002
21.6
E
1883 ELBFEEDER
IMO 9388522
974 TEU 2008
21.6
E
1884 BG DIAMOND
IMO 9803675
955 TEU 2017
21.6
E
1885 MONTE DA GUIA
IMO 9123788
621 TEU 1995
21.6
E
1886 ELBWINTER
IMO 9398773
1,036 TEU 2008
21.6
E
1887 ELBRUNNER
IMO 9395563
974 TEU 2009
21.7
E
1888 JPO GEMINI
IMO 9294020
2,474 TEU 2005
21.8
E
1889 MIRIAM BORCHARD
IMO 9246554
868 TEU 2004
21.8
E
1890 VIVIENNE SHERI D
IMO 9371426
925 TEU 2009
21.8
E
1891 AMELIE BORCHARD
IMO 9242560
868 TEU 2002
21.9
E
1892 WEC MONDRIAAN
IMO 9354363
868 TEU 2006
21.9
E
1893 AVILA
IMO 9295529
855 TEU 2007
21.9
E
1894 VERA A
IMO 9372585
1,022 TEU 2011
21.9
E
1895 SPICA J
IMO 9355460
850 TEU 2007
22.0
E
1896 MSC SAGITTARIUS F
IMO 9491616
916 TEU 2012
22.0
E
1897 MED IZMIR
IMO 9143879
951 TEU 1998
22.0
E
1898 SC POTOMAC
IMO 9236274
1,155 TEU 2002
22.1
E
1899 AILA
IMO 9354337
908 TEU 2007
22.1
E
1900 KANTATA
IMO 9327580
1,118 TEU 2006
22.1
E
Page 38 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.