Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,721 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-6% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1701 ZHENG RUN
IMO 9593816
81,822 2013
4.4
C
1702 ROSTRUM ASIA
IMO 9910349
40,003 2021
4.4
C
1703 NORD TOKYO
IMO 9959448
40,024 2023
4.4
C
1704 HE FENG
IMO 9180918
75,122 2000
4.4
C
1705 AFRICAN PUFFIN
IMO 9636448
55,863 2011
4.4
C
1706 ELENA VE
IMO 9453066
69,999 2010
4.4
C
1707 EQUINOX STAR
IMO 9503976
58,680 2011
4.4
C
1708 GREAT RAINBOW
IMO 9738492
63,464 2015
4.4
C
1709 ERTEA
IMO 9546198
54,876 2009
4.4
C
1710 DONALD M. JAMES
IMO 9770555
66,455 2018
4.4
C
1711 LAKER
IMO 9581368
57,399 2011
4.4
C
1712 PANAMAX OSTRIA
IMO 9399557
76,444 2008
4.4
C
1713 SPRING LOTUS
IMO 9942110
63,539 2023
4.4
C
1714 ST GREG
IMO 9596179
57,949 2010
4.4
C
1715 UNO
IMO 9423267
93,271 2009
4.4
C
1716 SUR
IMO 9941611
40,076 2023
4.4
C
1717 EPIPHANIA
IMO 9582116
80,276 2012
4.4
C
1718 ALTUS
IMO 9650169
58,630 2012
4.4
C
1719 AROSA
IMO 9244829
76,015 2001
4.4
C
1720 HORIZON JADE
IMO 9579054
76,032 2011
4.4
C
1721 CYCLADES
IMO 9799616
60,384 2017
4.4
C
1722 BELLE CONFIDENCE
IMO 9989924
40,381 2025
4.4
C
1723 JNS PEACE
IMO 1068994
40,502 2025
4.4
C
1724 CETUS HUMPBACK
IMO 9670731
43,479 2015
4.4
C
1725 HORIZON TRADER
IMO 1014319
40,598 2025
4.4
C
1726 ISSARA NAREE
IMO 9732187
64,000 2012
4.4
C
1727 KOUTALIANOS
IMO 9332016
92,710 2007
4.4
C
1728 HARVEST
IMO 9297931
73,691 2005
4.4
C
1729 HERMES
IMO 9613056
75,073 2012
4.4
C
1730 ETNA
IMO 9393618
48,549 2007
4.4
C
1731 FEDERAL POWER
IMO 9926051
42,692 2022
4.4
C
1732 MAROULIO S
IMO 9493511
75,700 2010
4.4
C
1733 MAPLE HARBOUR
IMO 9593323
55,832 2011
4.4
C
1734 NEW PRESTIGE
IMO 9598206
82,044 2013
4.4
C
1735 STAR LUTAS
IMO 9712709
61,347 2016
4.4
C
1736 XIN HAI TONG 8
IMO 9741566
48,897 2014
4.4
C
1737 ELIM BOUNCE
IMO 9515096
61,616 2012
4.4
C
1738 GULMAR
IMO 9146962
45,719 1997
4.4
C
1739 FEDERAL TYNE
IMO 9658903
55,160 2014
4.4
C
1740 DANAE
IMO 9719587
81,252 2017
4.5
C
1741 TWIN DELIGHT
IMO 9984481
40,656 2024
4.5
C
1742 THOR MONADIC
IMO 9331220
56,026 2006
4.5
C
1743 SIDER IMABARI
IMO 9984417
40,320 2024
4.5
C
1744 ASTURA
IMO 9994838
39,902 2024
4.5
C
1745 XIN HAI
IMO 9500950
75,380 2012
4.5
C
1746 SHELTER ISLAND
IMO 9426336
61,414 2006
4.5
C
1747 KYPROS LOYALTY
IMO 9717424
77,998 2015
4.5
C
1748 PITT ISLAND
IMO 9615157
61,395 2012
4.5
C
1749 SAKAR
IMO 9996953
32,195 2025
4.5
C
1750 JERA
IMO 9610884
57,111 2012
4.5
C
Page 35 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.