Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,598 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
+75% higher
E

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1551 HISTRIA GEMMA
IMO 9436719
40,404 2010
8.0
E
1552 PINE MEADOW
IMO 9478688
50,171 2006
8.1
E
1553 VS LISBETH
IMO 9309978
38,492 2006
8.1
E
1554 CHANTAL
IMO 9382982
74,329 2006
8.1
E
1555 HELLESPONT PRIDE
IMO 9351414
73,727 2003
8.1
E
1556 FURE VANGUARD
IMO 9963360
17,942 2024
8.1
E
1557 OM BORNEO
IMO 9341445
29,013 2007
8.1
E
1558 SAN SEBASTIAN
IMO 9314856
37,258 2007
8.2
E
1559 VS LEIA
IMO 9303730
38,461 2006
8.2
E
1560 GLENDA MELODY
IMO 9455818
47,238 2011
8.2
E
1561 SEAPIKE
IMO 9423449
43,550 2009
8.3
E
1562 TATIANA
IMO 9340128
38,396 2007
8.3
E
1563 MOUNT MCKINNEY
IMO 9263174
40,007 2001
8.3
E
1564 SINDRE KNUTSEN
IMO 9905928
123,602 2022
8.3
E
1565 SOUTHERN SHARK
IMO 9821299
26,051 2018
8.3
E
1566 SUNNY STAR
IMO 9470959
37,857 2010
8.3
E
1567 STI HAMMERSMITH
IMO 9706463
38,734 2015
8.3
E
1568 ALLEGRA
IMO 9436707
40,408 2009
8.3
E
1569 MOUNT OLYMPUS
IMO 9260081
40,011 2001
8.3
E
1570 TORM AGNES
IMO 9465992
49,999 2011
8.3
E
1571 MINERVA GRACE
IMO 9305855
50,922 2005
8.4
E
1572 TORILL KNUTSEN
IMO 9630030
123,166 2013
8.4
E
1573 SILVER HEBA
IMO 9718870
49,897 2013
8.4
E
1574 MINERVA ANTONIA
IMO 9380398
46,923 2008
8.5
E
1575 THUN VETTERN
IMO 9971214
17,945 2024
8.5
E
1576 STI POPLAR
IMO 9696589
38,734 2014
8.5
E
1577 ALKEA
IMO 9425502
36,207 2009
8.5
E
1578 PATRONA I
IMO 9305178
29,810 2004
8.5
E
1579 FURE VISKAER
IMO 9980320
17,953 2024
8.5
E
1580 HISTRIA IVORY
IMO 9356244
40,450 2006
8.6
E
1581 FURE VITEN
IMO 9898204
17,999 2021
8.6
E
1582 MAERSK KAYA
IMO 9431288
39,738 2011
8.6
E
1583 M BRISTOL
IMO 9299434
29,050 2005
8.6
E
1584 MAERSK BEAUFORT
IMO 9340594
29,015 2006
8.6
E
1585 STI FINCHLEY
IMO 9696565
38,734 2014
8.7
E
1586 HILDA KNUTSEN
IMO 9628300
123,166 2013
8.7
E
1587 HENRY MAERSK
IMO 9399351
37,933 2006
8.7
E
1588 STAR RIVER
IMO 9815458
36,819 2018
8.7
E
1589 STI CLAPHAM
IMO 9696577
38,734 2014
8.7
E
1590 FURE VIKEN
IMO 9980318
17,945 2024
8.7
E
1591 NV ATHENA
IMO 9527075
21,166 2011
8.8
E
1592 HULDA MAERSK
IMO 9399363
37,959 2010
8.8
E
1593 SKY
IMO 9380350
37,879 2007
8.8
E
1594 OM SINGAPORE
IMO 9341433
29,015 2007
8.8
E
1595 SEAEXPRESS
IMO 9344019
45,976 2007
8.8
E
1596 MAERSK KARA
IMO 9374428
38,396 2008
8.9
E
1597 MUMBAI
IMO 9242338
46,818 2000
8.9
E
1598 KRITI
IMO 9270737
47,999 2004
8.9
E
1599 LISCA NERA M
IMO 9436692
42,000 2009
8.9
E
1600 ZAPPHIRE
IMO 9391957
47,329 2010
9.0
E
Page 32 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.