Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#603 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-30% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 629 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

119
Q4
134
'27 Q1
85
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
136
'27 Q4
136
'28 Q1
94
'28 Q2
112
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,937 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,988 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,794 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,794 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,025 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,143
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,999–11,933M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,143 of 1,143 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.48 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
595 SHANDONG FU REN
IMO 9748784
81,783 2018
3.4
A
594 MYRTO
IMO 9518086
82,131 2013
3.4
A
606 CL PEKING
IMO 9911599
85,174 2021
3.4
A
605 LIME ALINA
IMO 9948425
84,990 2022
3.4
A
608 DARYA AUM
IMO 9768605
81,109 2018
3.4
A
604 MELTEMI
IMO 9952402
82,206 2022
3.4
A
616 LEMESSOS WIND
IMO 9516399
76,523 2009
3.4
A
609 HARVEST TIME
IMO 9643881
95,263 2015
3.4
A
603 EFE MERSIN
IMO 9792022
60,293 2017
3.4
A
615 LV STAR
IMO 9553218
79,252 2012
3.4
A
614 AQUAGRACE
IMO 9764087
81,672 2017
3.4
A
613 KOULITSA 2
IMO 9639684
78,129 2013
3.4
A
612 MEGHNA ADVENTURE
IMO 9805764
62,472 2018
3.4
A
611 MEGHNA LEGACY
IMO 9846275
63,449 2014
3.4
A
610 ZHENG FAN
IMO 9296858
87,052 2005
3.4
A
607 MSC CARINA
IMO 9625944
104,183 2013
3.4
A
617 YASA TEAM
IMO 9296250
75,621 2006
3.4
A
620 PORT OSAKA
IMO 9838541
62,716 2019
3.5
A
619 ARIETTA LILY
IMO 9727479
81,773 2017
3.5
A
621 KALEY
IMO 9700689
63,261 2015
3.5
A
618 HG HAMBURG
IMO 9954981
64,199 2024
3.5
A
624 SDTR DORA
IMO 9859026
81,780 2019
3.5
A
622 BULK CONCORD
IMO 9516387
76,600 2009
3.5
A
623 ROLAND OLDENDORFF
IMO 9463633
121,448 2011
3.5
A
625 SPIRIT OF HO-PING
IMO 9433638
82,152 2011
3.5
A
627 PORT KYOTO
IMO 9942093
63,733 2022
3.5
A
630 SDTR GLORIA
IMO 9877896
84,984 2022
3.5
A
629 NAVIOS CITRINE
IMO 9782170
81,626 2017
3.5
A
628 EXCELSIOR DIVA
IMO 9960198
63,739 2023
3.5
A
631 PAC CHRISTINA
IMO 9913690
63,088 2022
3.5
A
626 BERGE TATEYAMA
IMO 9866706
63,511 2020
3.5
A
640 ACRUX AMELIA
IMO 9909194
82,577 2021
3.5
A
633 ZHONG CHANG ZHOU SHAN
IMO 9670808
75,409 2013
3.5
A
632 BESKIDY
IMO 9582958
82,138 2013
3.5
A
641 DE MING HAI
IMO 9364746
76,432 2008
3.5
A
639 BULK SWEDEN
IMO 9691589
77,126 2010
3.5
A
638 RANGER
IMO 9493999
82,172 2012
3.5
A
637 AEOLIAN BREEZE
IMO 9620621
78,092 2012
3.5
A
636 AQUALIBRA
IMO 9765603
63,948 2018
3.5
A
635 MAGIC PERSEUS
IMO 9582477
82,158 2013
3.5
A
634 KM HAKATA
IMO 9659830
95,349 2013
3.5
A
650 NORD SUNDA
IMO 9860738
63,343 2019
3.5
A
649 IDOMENEAS
IMO 9448035
114,167 2010
3.5
A
648 SAKIZAYA ELEGANCE
IMO 9713806
81,938 2015
3.5
A
647 BBG HONOR
IMO 9702716
81,917 2015
3.5
A
646 CS HANGZHOU
IMO 9830070
81,600 2019
3.5
A
645 GCL ICON
IMO 9880245
82,576 2021
3.5
A
644 VIBEKE IRIS
IMO 9744996
81,886 2016
3.5
A
643 ULTRA JAGUAR
IMO 9723136
81,922 2016
3.5
A
642 PLAINPALAIS
IMO 9739032
81,756 2015
3.5
A
Page 13 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.