Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,854 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
15.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.89)
+54% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 461 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,485 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.22
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1851 MANDO
IMO 9175705
1,174 TEU 1999
16.0
E
1852 MSC GAETA II
IMO 9306213
1,574 TEU 2007
16.0
E
1853 MATILDE A
IMO 9292448
1,200 TEU 2003
16.0
E
1854 ANNALISA P
IMO 9437141
1,284 TEU 2008
16.1
E
1855 ELBSPRING
IMO 9462794
1,425 TEU 2009
16.1
E
1856 BALTIC SHARK
IMO 9315032
868 TEU 2004
16.1
E
1857 MSC HOGGAR
IMO 9286449
858 TEU 2004
16.1
E
1858 CHATTANOOGA
IMO 9611034
1,036 TEU 2012
16.1
E
1859 CONTSHIP BOX
IMO 9449845
1,496 TEU 2009
16.2
E
1860 SC MARIGOT
IMO 9275115
1,200 TEU 2005
16.2
E
1861 EF EMIRA
IMO 9357810
1,706 TEU 2008
16.2
E
1862 BG GREEN
IMO 9964613
1,400 TEU 2021
16.2
E
1863 MSC CEDAR II
IMO 9231092
1,680 TEU 2001
16.3
E
1864 MARIELYST
IMO 9448669
1,085 TEU 2010
16.3
E
1865 MSC STRAIT II
IMO 9351218
1,713 TEU 2008
16.4
E
1866 MSC ELKE F
IMO 9318773
830 TEU 2005
16.4
E
1867 THETIS D
IMO 9372274
1,425 TEU 2009
16.5
E
1868 MICHIGAN
IMO 9437139
1,284 TEU 2008
16.5
E
1869 MSC ALBA F
IMO 9499010
1,022 TEU 2008
16.6
E
1870 ONUR G.A
IMO 9238076
1,208 TEU 2001
16.6
E
1871 KARLA A
IMO 9297577
1,676 TEU 2003
16.6
E
1872 MSC ERMINIA III
IMO 9246346
2,490 TEU 2003
16.7
E
1873 MED TEKIRDAG
IMO 9265598
1,100 TEU 2003
16.8
E
1874 ALANA
IMO 9297589
862 TEU 2004
16.8
E
1875 DANIEL A
IMO 9238064
1,208 TEU 2001
16.8
E
1876 ANINA
IMO 9354351
1,008 TEU 2006
16.9
E
1877 ATLANTIC NORTH
IMO 9236597
1,129 TEU 2002
16.9
E
1878 NORDIC PORTO
IMO 9448671
1,085 TEU 2011
17.0
E
1879 MEDKON MIRA
IMO 9152911
1,150 TEU 1998
17.0
E
1880 ELBSUMMER
IMO 9386718
1,425 TEU 2009
17.0
E
1881 BURAK BAYRAKTAR
IMO 9260536
858 TEU 2002
17.0
E
1882 MSC MARYLENA II
IMO 9169031
1,658 TEU 1998
17.1
E
1883 VICTORIA L
IMO 9430155
1,300 TEU 2009
17.1
E
1884 CMA CGM KAILAS
IMO 9339545
1,860 TEU 2006
17.1
E
1885 BG RED
IMO 9976965
1,400 TEU 2024
17.2
E
1886 HEINRICH EHLER
IMO 9372200
1,425 TEU 2008
17.2
E
1887 CMA CGM BLOSSOM
IMO 9962524
1,096 TEU 2023
17.3
E
1888 MSC RACHEL F
IMO 9212010
1,216 TEU 2000
17.3
E
1889 BG ORANGE
IMO 9964637
1,400 TEU 2024
17.4
E
1890 CMA CGM NOUADHIBOU
IMO 9376892
1,350 TEU 2007
17.4
E
1891 RMS ROSE
IMO 9318761
830 TEU 2005
17.5
E
1892 SKYVIEW
IMO 9358890
1,300 TEU 2007
17.6
E
1893 CMA CGM GULF EXPRESS
IMO 9239874
1,679 TEU 2002
17.6
E
1894 MERITO
IMO 9167942
1,104 TEU 1998
17.6
E
1895 EXPERT
IMO 9412529
880 TEU 2010
17.6
E
1896 MEDKON ANKA
IMO 9366469
1,147 TEU 2007
17.7
E
1897 WEC MONDRIAAN
IMO 9354363
868 TEU 2006
17.7
E
1898 ELBSTROM
IMO 9369007
974 TEU 2008
17.7
E
1899 FIONA
IMO 9149885
1,698 TEU 1998
17.8
E
1900 BFR
IMO 9103386
652 TEU 1995
17.8
E
Page 38 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.