Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#3,439 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
8.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
+75% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
3401 CENTURY EMERALD
IMO 9726841
16,181 2015
8.2
E
3402 ATALANTE
IMO 9363168
23,641 2008
8.2
E
3403 LADY AILLAR
IMO 9550278
28,496 2010
8.2
E
3404 MASTRO MITROS
IMO 9228071
45,601 2001
8.2
E
3405 SENECA
IMO 9856725
9,287 2020
8.2
E
3406 RESOURCE
IMO 9487031
31,775 2010
8.2
E
3407 RESKO
IMO 9393462
30,372 2010
8.3
E
3408 GLORIOUS SEA
IMO 9370977
24,781 2006
8.3
E
3409 DANNY BOY
IMO 9324722
28,386 2005
8.3
E
3410 PALAU
IMO 9261035
31,837 2003
8.3
E
3411 LADY LAVELA
IMO 9675561
28,316 2015
8.3
E
3412 STAR WESTPORT
IMO 9705988
63,334 2015
8.3
E
3413 RAZONI
IMO 9086526
29,292 1996
8.3
E
3414 MACCOA
IMO 9413913
30,898 2009
8.3
E
3415 SABEEL STAR
IMO 9257058
27,101 2003
8.4
E
3416 ROYAL STAR
IMO 9223813
27,028 2001
8.4
E
3417 LAPIS LAZULI
IMO 9450662
37,773 2010
8.4
E
3418 ALKADI BEY
IMO 9085675
21,964 1995
8.4
E
3419 JU XI
IMO 9567441
57,000 2011
8.4
E
3420 TAO ACE
IMO 9639696
25,064 2013
8.4
E
3421 KALLIOPI S
IMO 9450844
34,417 2012
8.4
E
3422 UNICORN OL
IMO 9998262
13,461 2024
8.4
E
3423 RUI FU BANG
IMO 9609847
35,212 2011
8.4
E
3424 BOW ARM
IMO 9558737
35,106 2009
8.5
E
3425 ERTEA
IMO 9546198
54,876 2009
8.5
E
3426 ROYAL O
IMO 9084229
21,955 1994
8.5
E
3427 GLOBAL CROWN
IMO 9579406
38,145 2012
8.5
E
3428 BELTNES
IMO 9432206
33,173 2009
8.5
E
3429 SUPER SARKAS
IMO 9221633
28,495 2002
8.5
E
3430 NIMET TORLAK
IMO 9282948
18,820 2003
8.5
E
3431 LORD HASSAN
IMO 9146895
23,581 1996
8.5
E
3432 CECELA S
IMO 9227857
19,225 2000
8.5
E
3433 AGIOS PORFYRIOS
IMO 9244075
20,002 2002
8.5
E
3434 PAN BONITA
IMO 9626015
38,140 2012
8.5
E
3435 APHRODITE M
IMO 9450832
34,399 2011
8.5
E
3436 TUFTY
IMO 9393163
30,803 2009
8.5
E
3437 BRANT
IMO 9393151
30,777 2008
8.5
E
3438 TUNDRA
IMO 9415208
30,892 2009
8.5
E
3439 GREENWING
IMO 9230921
26,722 2002
8.5
E
3440 EIRINI S
IMO 9595369
34,039 2012
8.5
E
3441 FITNES
IMO 9490105
33,169 2010
8.5
E
3442 ANDEAN
IMO 9413925
30,770 2009
8.6
E
3443 CHISE BULKER
IMO 9667722
33,355 2014
8.6
E
3444 BRIGHTON
IMO 9966817
64,701 2024
8.6
E
3445 LADY LILLY
IMO 9642021
28,397 2013
8.6
E
3446 PIRRIHIOS
IMO 9553804
28,375 2010
8.6
E
3447 COSCO TAIHANGSHAN
IMO 9418327
31,847 2010
8.6
E
3448 SEASTAR EXPLORER
IMO 9498303
34,569 2006
8.6
E
3449 AK LIZA
IMO 9300855
32,118 2007
8.6
E
3450 LILA HOUSTON
IMO 9559676
32,581 2010
8.6
E
Page 69 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.