Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,161 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
9.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-12% greener
C
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1151 APL MINNESOTA
IMO 9350018
5,888 TEU 2008
9.0
C
1152 VAGA MAERSK
IMO 9778545
3,700 TEU 2019
9.0
C
1153 MSC FAIRFIELD
IMO 9302633
8,208 TEU 2006
9.0
C
1154 ITAL WAY
IMO 9950789
2,300 TEU 2024
9.1
C
1155 IRENES RULE
IMO 9953561
2,782 TEU 2023
9.1
C
1156 MSC CORNELIA
IMO 9426817
5,083 TEU 2010
9.1
C
1157 MAERSK MONTANA
IMO 9305312
4,300 TEU 2006
9.1
C
1158 MSC KATYAYNI
IMO 9110389
5,711 TEU 1996
9.1
C
1159 MSC ROSSELLA III
IMO 9320025
2,700 TEU 2006
9.1
C
1160 SPIRIT OF SINGAPORE
IMO 9362396
3,630 TEU 2007
9.2
C
1161 MSC LEO VI
IMO 9229312
6,178 TEU 2002
9.2
C
1162 MAERSK BOGOR
IMO 9394882
3,100 TEU 2009
9.2
C
1163 CMA CGM JAMAICA
IMO 9326770
4,298 TEU 2006
9.2
C
1164 BERNHARD SCHULTE
IMO 9484546
4,616 TEU 2010
9.2
C
1165 ONE ATLAS
IMO 9290115
4,253 TEU 2005
9.2
C
1166 LIVERPOOL EXPRESS
IMO 9232565
4,115 TEU 2002
9.2
C
1167 CAPE SKAGEN
IMO 9969857
2,713 TEU 2023
9.2
C
1168 BROOKLYN BRIDGE
IMO 9458999
4,432 TEU 2010
9.2
C
1169 LANGENESS
IMO 9944778
1,800 TEU 2023
9.2
C
1170 MAERSK BATUR
IMO 9402029
3,100 TEU 2009
9.2
C
1171 LADY JANE
IMO 9297474
5,042 TEU 2005
9.2
C
1172 MSC MARIA CLARA
IMO 9287900
5,060 TEU 2004
9.3
C
1173 CMA CGM SALAMANQUE
IMO 9961348
2,000 TEU 2024
9.3
C
1174 AMERICA
IMO 9285990
8,468 TEU 2004
9.3
C
1175 PORTO CHELI
IMO 9221839
6,734 TEU 2001
9.3
C
1176 JOLLY GIADA
IMO 9484522
4,400 TEU 2010
9.3
C
1177 NORTHERN JUBILEE
IMO 9450337
8,400 TEU 2009
9.3
C
1178 MSC RITA V
IMO 9313929
4,196 TEU 2006
9.3
C
1179 MIMMI SCHULTE
IMO 9743473
2,239 TEU 2017
9.3
C
1180 MELINA
IMO 9401075
3,853 TEU 2009
9.3
C
1181 CHIQUITA FARMER
IMO 9336189
2,500 TEU 2007
9.3
C
1182 MSC ANDRIANA III
IMO 9222120
2,550 TEU 2001
9.3
C
1183 MERKUR ARCHIPELAGO
IMO 9456977
4,300 TEU 2009
9.3
C
1184 MATTHEW SCHULTE
IMO 9743497
2,239 TEU 2019
9.3
C
1185 DYROS
IMO 9380403
4,506 TEU 2008
9.3
C
1186 VENTO DI BORA
IMO 9950064
1,900 TEU 2023
9.3
C
1187 MAERSK CAP CARMEL
IMO 9273923
2,526 TEU 2003
9.3
C
1188 CMA CGM AFRICA TWO
IMO 9451927
3,600 TEU 2010
9.3
C
1189 MAERSK NAIROBI
IMO 9356165
2,478 TEU 2009
9.3
C
1190 MSC VERACRUZ
IMO 9287924
5,060 TEU 2005
9.4
C
1191 ULSAN
IMO 9243306
3,900 TEU 2002
9.4
C
1192 MSC VIDISHA R.
IMO 9227326
4,112 TEU 2002
9.4
C
1193 ANL WYONG
IMO 9334155
4,250 TEU 2008
9.4
C
1194 CHARLESTON
IMO 9461506
8,600 TEU 2011
9.4
C
1195 JPO LIBRA
IMO 9297840
4,132 TEU 2005
9.4
C
1196 JPO VENUS
IMO 9351608
4,254 TEU 2010
9.4
C
1197 DIMITRA C
IMO 9250995
4,924 TEU 2002
9.4
C
1198 MSC TRACY V
IMO 9295177
4,900 TEU 2005
9.4
C
1199 JADRANA
IMO 9619385
4,800 TEU 2014
9.4
C
1200 ELENI T
IMO 9397585
3,853 TEU 2009
9.4
C
Page 24 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.