Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#967 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
11.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
+17% higher
D

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.79
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
951 TG TAURUS
IMO 9523835
26,199 2011
11.4
D
952 TERNFJORD
IMO 9722405
14,848 2016
11.4
D
953 THUN LIVERPOOL
IMO 9828998
18,684 2019
11.4
D
954 SUN 9
IMO 9529645
19,992 2010
11.4
D
955 CIELO DI ULSAN
IMO 9717266
39,060 2015
11.4
D
956 CHEM STREAM
IMO 9479979
19,998 2010
11.5
D
957 CONDOR TRADER
IMO 9742077
22,423 2016
11.5
D
958 SWAN INDIAN
IMO 9724051
19,855 2015
11.5
D
959 ANDINO DELTA
IMO 9172210
16,028 1998
11.5
D
960 SAMC SWAN
IMO 9813058
8,707 2019
11.5
D
961 JBU ONYX
IMO 9392999
19,864 2008
11.5
D
962 AAPUS 11
IMO 9508158
19,814 2008
11.5
D
963 THERESA II
IMO 9871074
19,907 2020
11.5
D
964 STOLT INVENTION
IMO 9102100
36,733 1997
11.5
D
965 MISTRAL EXPLORER
IMO 9624770
21,323 2012
11.6
D
966 NORMAN
IMO 9125279
10,022 1996
11.6
D
967 GINGA KITE
IMO 9228291
19,997 2001
11.6
D
968 SIGAIA THERESA
IMO 9748710
12,661 2015
11.6
D
969 ADELAIDE
IMO 9597721
21,280 2011
11.6
D
970 EVA FUJI
IMO 9914242
19,891 2021
11.6
D
971 MAC TOKYO
IMO 9343778
19,998 2006
11.6
D
972 KOCATEPE
IMO 9274666
37,082 2005
11.7
D
973 STOLT ACHIEVEMENT
IMO 9124469
37,141 1999
11.7
D
974 STANLEY PARK
IMO 9363845
19,994 2008
11.7
D
975 SCOT FLENSBURG
IMO 9365269
8,150 2008
11.7
D
976 SOLAR ALICE
IMO 9887384
24,621 2021
11.7
D
977 HAI XING
IMO 9291066
16,881 2004
11.7
D
978 DS OCEAN
IMO 9330587
19,940 2007
11.7
D
979 NYMPH THETIS
IMO 9232369
17,427 2000
11.7
D
980 MAC LONDON
IMO 9296872
19,999 2003
11.7
D
981 MELATI 6
IMO 9172260
31,969 2000
11.7
D
982 BALTIC SWIFT
IMO 9464376
37,565 2010
11.7
D
983 STELLA THERESA
IMO 9594145
12,601 2011
11.7
D
984 CONTI BENGUELA
IMO 9391373
37,652 2008
11.7
D
985 MONJASA ROVER
IMO 9271884
17,653 2004
11.8
D
986 CHEM NEW YORK
IMO 9705732
19,994 2014
11.8
D
987 GINGA LEOPARD
IMO 9425992
25,982 2008
11.8
D
988 TG GEMINI
IMO 9442562
25,594 2009
11.8
D
989 XANTHIA
IMO 9246152
17,031 2003
11.8
D
990 EVA PEARL
IMO 9985992
19,910 2024
11.8
D
991 SWAN DIGNITY
IMO 9806706
12,661 2017
11.8
D
992 GOLDEN RAY
IMO 9640102
19,801 2012
11.8
D
993 SEA BAZOU
IMO 9391141
19,998 2008
11.9
D
994 GWEN
IMO 9407067
19,702 2008
11.9
D
995 LAVRAKI
IMO 9323077
20,811 2007
11.9
D
996 SLOMAN HESTIA
IMO 9776133
16,473 2017
11.9
D
997 FURE WEST
IMO 9301873
17,349 2006
11.9
D
998 SONGA POLARIS
IMO 9457749
25,145 2011
11.9
D
999 GRIFFIN T
IMO 9390537
10,778 2008
11.9
D
1000 ERDEK
IMO 9175767
10,307 1998
11.9
D
Page 20 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.