Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,700 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
15.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
+44% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.41
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1651 CIRTA
IMO 9845051
1,500 TEU 2020
14.5
E
1652 BRUARFOSS
IMO 9822841
2,150 TEU 2020
14.5
E
1653 CMA CGM HOMERE
IMO 9362322
1,713 TEU 2007
14.5
E
1654 ESSENCE
IMO 9491496
1,436 TEU 2011
14.5
E
1655 A LA MARINE
IMO 9386524
1,440 TEU 2009
14.5
E
1656 NORDLUCHS
IMO 9673666
1,730 TEU 2014
14.5
E
1657 MERATUS JAYAKARTA
IMO 9305879
2,474 TEU 2005
14.6
E
1658 MSC ASLI
IMO 9162631
1,388 TEU 2000
14.6
E
1659 OYKU A
IMO 9292462
1,223 TEU 2005
14.7
E
1660 CMA CGM SAINT LAURENT
IMO 9709219
2,100 TEU 2015
14.7
E
1661 EF EMIRA
IMO 9357810
1,706 TEU 2008
14.7
E
1662 AS FRANZISKA
IMO 9295517
1,345 TEU 2005
14.7
E
1663 MSC NITA
IMO 9084607
1,512 TEU 1996
14.7
E
1664 MSC EMILIE
IMO 9334832
1,732 TEU 2006
14.7
E
1665 EMOTION
IMO 9359258
1,440 TEU 2008
14.8
E
1666 CONTSHIP RUN
IMO 9306237
1,432 TEU 2007
14.8
E
1667 FREDERIK
IMO 9328637
1,200 TEU 2005
14.8
E
1668 CAPE FULMAR
IMO 9359313
1,440 TEU 2007
14.8
E
1669 MSC AGNA II
IMO 9509774
1,496 TEU 2009
14.9
E
1670 OKEE ALICIA
IMO 9334818
1,740 TEU 2007
14.9
E
1671 HARRISON
IMO 9220079
1,197 TEU 2002
15.0
E
1672 LASALLE
IMO 9349368
2,450 TEU 2006
15.0
E
1673 WYBELSUM
IMO 9386976
1,402 TEU 2008
15.0
E
1674 MSC NORDEROOG F
IMO 9256315
1,402 TEU 2004
15.0
E
1675 ONUR G.A
IMO 9238076
1,221 TEU 2001
15.0
E
1676 MARINA L
IMO 9431331
1,368 TEU 2009
15.1
E
1677 CHATTANOOGA
IMO 9611034
1,042 TEU 2012
15.1
E
1678 MEDKON ANKA
IMO 9366469
1,155 TEU 2007
15.1
E
1679 MSC PALATIUM III
IMO 9336165
2,546 TEU 2006
15.1
E
1680 AS SABRINA
IMO 9387463
1,713 TEU 2009
15.1
E
1681 DETTIFOSS
IMO 9822853
2,150 TEU 2020
15.2
E
1682 CONTSHIP SEA
IMO 9306213
1,432 TEU 2007
15.2
E
1683 MANDO
IMO 9175705
1,174 TEU 1999
15.2
E
1684 CELSIUS NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9412842
1,577 TEU 2007
15.3
E
1685 BG GREEN
IMO 9964613
1,400 TEU 2021
15.3
E
1686 TUKUMA ARCTICA
IMO 9822865
2,150 TEU 2020
15.3
E
1687 MSC IRA II
IMO 9323493
1,732 TEU 2007
15.3
E
1688 ANNALISA P
IMO 9437141
1,296 TEU 2008
15.3
E
1689 RUTH BORCHARD
IMO 9212034
1,216 TEU 2000
15.3
E
1690 EAGLE II
IMO 9301122
1,402 TEU 2006
15.4
E
1691 DOUCE FRANCE
IMO 9845661
2,296 TEU 2020
15.5
E
1692 SPIRIT OF CHENNAI
IMO 9813840
1,162 TEU 2019
15.5
E
1693 JOST
IMO 9477347
1,338 TEU 2010
15.5
E
1694 VERA D
IMO 9290177
1,678 TEU 2004
15.5
E
1695 MSC PAXI II
IMO 9256391
1,400 TEU 2004
15.6
E
1696 CMA CGM FORT ST PIERRE
IMO 9261891
2,260 TEU 2003
15.6
E
1697 JONNI RITSCHER
IMO 9333383
1,856 TEU 2006
15.6
E
1698 ELBELLA
IMO 9312640
1,740 TEU 2006
15.7
E
1699 SONDERBORG
IMO 9454242
1,080 TEU 2012
15.7
E
1700 MSC AMY
IMO 9242651
1,683 TEU 2002
15.7
E
Page 34 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.