Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#644 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
11.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
+7% higher
C

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,033B 687C 506D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 274 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 763 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 763 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 659 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
601 HALISDEMIR
IMO 9517331
7,394 2008
11.0
C
602 SAADET
IMO 9522063
12,198 2009
11.0
C
603 SEAHORSE
IMO 9159000
8,474 1997
11.1
C
604 OMAYA
IMO 8408648
8,875 1984
11.1
C
605 DA XIANG
IMO 9768552
28,577 2017
11.1
C
606 HELME
IMO 9504140
11,023 2011
11.1
C
607 NAVIN HAWK
IMO 9522738
7,959 2009
11.1
C
608 OCEAN FORCE
IMO 8821814
12,150 1990
11.1
C
609 SEHER YAGCI
IMO 9556911
10,450 2009
11.1
C
610 MUZAFFER ANA
IMO 9554157
12,447 2010
11.1
C
611 AVONBORG
IMO 9466362
17,294 2012
11.1
C
612 KC MERMAID
IMO 9505156
7,184 2021
11.2
C
613 BOZKURT
IMO 9171371
9,861 2000
11.2
C
614 TRINITYBORG
IMO 9546485
21,277 2013
11.2
C
615 BBC ODESA
IMO 9963413
12,422 2023
11.2
C
616 NAVIN FALCON
IMO 9492933
7,933 2008
11.2
C
617 YASMINA
IMO 9177765
13,347 1998
11.2
C
618 ABILITY
IMO 9145645
17,440 1998
11.3
C
619 BRUCE
IMO 9741140
12,300 2016
11.3
C
620 CHELSEA-3
IMO 9361392
5,827 2006
11.4
C
621 NURI SONAY
IMO 9310202
14,888 2006
11.4
C
622 ERNA SU
IMO 9037290
10,776 2002
11.4
C
623 YM EVEREST
IMO 9653812
16,717 2014
11.4
C
624 UAL CASTLE
IMO 9626168
11,183 2013
11.4
C
625 CAPTAIN GRIGORIY VOVCHUK
IMO 9504279
9,347 2010
11.4
C
626 EEBORG
IMO 9568328
11,901 2012
11.5
C
627 ONEGO ISLE
IMO 9626156
11,183 2012
11.5
C
628 LUCKY
IMO 9037305
10,605 2002
11.5
C
629 HIZIR
IMO 9396529
8,128 2007
11.5
C
630 THAMESBORG
IMO 9546459
21,359 2013
11.5
C
631 EDELSTEIN
IMO 9159581
10,763 1997
11.5
C
632 GRIT CEMENT III
IMO 9116515
16,325 1996
11.6
C
633 CHELSEA-7
IMO 9492634
6,320 2010
11.6
C
634 ADNAN N
IMO 9334973
11,776 2006
11.6
C
635 ARKLOW ACE
IMO 9851957
8,543 2020
11.6
C
636 ALEXIA
IMO 9997282
14,404 2024
11.6
C
637 PACIFIC FORTITUDE
IMO 9381392
12,740 2007
11.6
C
638 HAMBURG.S
IMO 9071650
10,560 1993
11.6
C
639 K HAK
IMO 9532848
12,647 2009
11.6
C
640 ARAGONBORG
IMO 9466312
17,294 2010
11.6
C
641 LONGWAVE
IMO 9693109
10,713 2015
11.6
C
642 AMAZONEBORG
IMO 9333541
17,355 2007
11.7
C
643 CONDOR VALPARAISO
IMO 9473224
17,257 2011
11.7
C
644 AK DISCOVERY
IMO 9218208
8,676 2001
11.7
C
645 ABK EAGLE
IMO 9217462
14,026 1999
11.7
C
646 LARISSA 1
IMO 9154268
17,064 1999
11.7
C
647 KALLIO
IMO 9319064
21,353 2006
11.7
C
648 VECTIS PRIDE
IMO 9626132
11,183 2012
11.7
C
649 FWN SPACE
IMO 9735232
10,546 2018
11.8
C
650 ABOUDI D
IMO 9385817
8,759 2007
11.8
C
Page 13 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.