Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,631 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
11.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
+20% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1601 AVA D
IMO 9306225
1,574 TEU 2007
11.7
D
1602 CMA CGM NEVA
IMO 9745548
2,487 TEU 2018
11.8
D
1603 GH FOEHN
IMO 9377559
2,702 TEU 2008
11.8
D
1604 MUSTAFA DAYI
IMO 9365855
1,849 TEU 2005
11.8
D
1605 MSC SANDY III
IMO 9239733
2,460 TEU 2002
11.8
D
1606 MAERSK VALPARAISO
IMO 9433054
1,740 TEU 2010
11.8
D
1607 VALENTINA
IMO 9344722
1,853 TEU 2007
11.8
D
1608 CMA CGM AFRICA TWO
IMO 9451927
3,718 TEU 2010
11.8
D
1609 SANTA MARTA EXPRESS
IMO 9446104
2,556 TEU 2010
11.8
D
1610 ODYSSEUS
IMO 9315824
2,824 TEU 2006
11.8
D
1611 SAN ALFONSO
IMO 9344667
1,819 TEU 2007
11.9
D
1612 MAERSK NANSHA
IMO 9385996
2,500 TEU 2008
11.9
D
1613 MSC LEA II
IMO 9162643
1,388 TEU 2000
11.9
D
1614 NEXOE MAERSK
IMO 9220885
2,226 TEU 2001
11.9
D
1615 LION
IMO 9208356
1,716 TEU 2000
11.9
D
1616 CAPE BYRON
IMO 9950090
1,900 TEU 2023
11.9
D
1617 MIEKE SCHULTE
IMO 9694426
2,339 TEU 2015
11.9
D
1618 MAERSK NILE
IMO 9385972
2,500 TEU 2008
11.9
D
1619 GREEN HOPE
IMO 9629160
1,700 TEU 2014
12.0
D
1620 MARIO A
IMO 9337377
1,604 TEU 2007
12.0
D
1621 KOTA NABIL
IMO 9356830
1,810 TEU 2008
12.0
D
1622 SINAR BUKITTINGGI
IMO 9942299
1,500 TEU 2023
12.0
D
1623 TORONTO EXPRESS
IMO 9253727
4,402 TEU 2003
12.0
D
1624 CAUCEDO EXPRESS
IMO 9434931
2,556 TEU 2009
12.0
D
1625 ITAL WAY
IMO 9950789
2,300 TEU 2021
12.0
D
1626 MARGARETE SCHULTE
IMO 9302944
2,602 TEU 2006
12.0
D
1627 MACAO
IMO 9362724
1,794 TEU 2008
12.0
D
1628 CMA CGM ORANGE
IMO 9690092
2,257 TEU 2016
12.0
D
1629 CRISTINA A
IMO 9337365
1,604 TEU 2007
12.1
D
1630 MSC YOSHEEN
IMO 9322011
1,726 TEU 2008
12.1
D
1631 RACHEL BORCHARD
IMO 1016587
17,484 2025
12.1
D
1632 JPO AQUARIUS
IMO 9220316
2,470 TEU 2000
12.1
D
1633 MSC ARAINA III
IMO 9345984
3,534 TEU 2008
12.1
D
1634 CMA CGM AFRICA ONE
IMO 9451915
3,718 TEU 2010
12.1
D
1635 MSC JENNIFER II
IMO 9433157
1,794 TEU 2009
12.1
D
1636 MAERSK WAKAYAMA
IMO 9550357
1,577 TEU 2010
12.1
D
1637 CONTAINERSHIPS POLAR
IMO 9814002
1,380 TEU 2015
12.1
D
1638 SAGAMORE
IMO 9322009
1,730 TEU 2008
12.1
D
1639 MSC CLAUDIA
IMO 9113446
1,205 TEU 1996
12.1
D
1640 RIYADH MUKAAB
IMO 9399806
2,896 TEU 2010
12.2
D
1641 MSC SINES R
IMO 9210098
3,430 TEU 2001
12.2
D
1642 VIOLETTA
IMO 9344710
1,853 TEU 2007
12.2
D
1643 ECO PONENTE
IMO 9985966
13,661 2024
12.2
D
1644 NCL VESTLAND
IMO 9981790
1,300 TEU 2025
12.3
D
1645 CMA CGM AGATHA
IMO 9763722
1,924 TEU 2016
12.3
D
1646 LUCIE SCHULTE
IMO 9301926
2,602 TEU 2006
12.3
D
1647 AS CLAUDIA
IMO 9330549
2,824 TEU 2007
12.3
D
1648 PANDA 005
IMO 9981063
1,400 TEU 2022
12.3
D
1649 VALDIVIA
IMO 9333395
1,856 TEU 2006
12.3
D
1650 DELPHIS RIGA
IMO 9780665
1,924 TEU 2017
12.3
D
Page 33 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.