Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,295 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
9.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-7% greener
C
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1251 SEADREAM
IMO 9632832
5,023 TEU 2014
9.0
C
1252 MSC YUXIN
IMO 9966946
1,800 TEU 2024
9.0
C
1253 ONTARIO EXPRESS
IMO 9290816
5,512 TEU 2005
9.0
C
1254 MONACO
IMO 9389708
4,250 TEU 2009
9.0
C
1255 MSC NEW HAVEN
IMO 9293777
8,084 TEU 2005
9.0
C
1256 EXPRESS ARGENTINA
IMO 9443011
3,459 TEU 2010
9.0
C
1257 PL GERMANY
IMO 9288394
5,888 TEU 2003
9.0
C
1258 CMA CGM TAGE
IMO 9674555
9,365 TEU 2015
9.0
C
1259 MSC GUERNSEY V
IMO 9631876
4,699 TEU 2015
9.0
C
1260 MSC HANNAH
IMO 9316347
2,732 TEU 2006
9.0
C
1261 GSL MARIA
IMO 9231236
5,762 TEU 2001
9.0
C
1262 ARICA EXPRESS
IMO 9495765
4,600 TEU 2013
9.0
C
1263 LISA
IMO 9418652
4,250 TEU 2009
9.0
C
1264 MAX SCHULTE
IMO 9676711
2,339 TEU 2015
9.0
C
1265 JAMAICA
IMO 9403229
4,253 TEU 2009
9.0
C
1266 MAERSK BINTAN
IMO 9355288
3,194 TEU 2005
9.0
C
1267 YM FOUNTAIN
IMO 9278090
5,551 TEU 2002
9.0
C
1268 MSC KATYAYNI VI
IMO 9110389
5,711 TEU 1996
9.0
C
1269 DIMITRA C
IMO 9250995
4,924 TEU 2002
9.0
C
1270 QUEBEC EXPRESS
IMO 9294836
5,512 TEU 2006
9.1
C
1271 EVER SMILE
IMO 9300415
7,024 TEU 2006
9.1
C
1272 KOTA KARIM
IMO 9307425
3,081 TEU 2006
9.1
C
1273 MSC ORIANE
IMO 9372482
5,782 TEU 2008
9.1
C
1274 GREEN PARK
IMO 9983449
2,954 TEU 2024
9.1
C
1275 MSC NICOLE X
IMO 9214898
7,226 TEU 1998
9.1
C
1276 CHIQUITA SAILOR
IMO 9344693
1,819 TEU 2008
9.1
C
1277 MSC TUXPAN V
IMO 9289972
5,060 TEU 2005
9.1
C
1278 MSC ULSAN III
IMO 9305001
2,702 TEU 2004
9.1
C
1279 APL CALIFORNIA
IMO 9350044
6,350 TEU 2009
9.1
C
1280 CMA CGM MOMBASA
IMO 9367815
2,578 TEU 2008
9.1
C
1281 TIANJIN
IMO 9398462
9,262 TEU 2010
9.1
C
1282 XIN XIA MEN
IMO 9270476
5,668 TEU 2004
9.1
C
1283 MSC BANU III
IMO 9263332
3,400 TEU 2004
9.1
C
1284 DELPHINUS C
IMO 9337652
4,888 TEU 2007
9.1
C
1285 INDEPENDENT PRIMERO
IMO 9298636
3,091 TEU 2005
9.1
C
1286 MAERSK BULAN
IMO 9355343
3,100 TEU 2005
9.1
C
1287 VENTO DI LEVANTE
IMO 9683489
1,800 TEU 2023
9.1
C
1288 MSC MANDY III
IMO 8918966
2,668 TEU 1993
9.1
C
1289 CHIQUITA HORIZON
IMO 1032426
1,747 TEU 2024
9.1
C
1290 SHANGHAI
IMO 9305570
9,383 TEU 2006
9.2
C
1291 MSC MARIA LAURA II
IMO 8616520
2,750 TEU 1988
9.2
C
1292 MAERSK KENTUCKY
IMO 9193240
4,300 TEU 1998
9.2
C
1293 AL JUBAIL
IMO 9547219
3,016 TEU 2014
9.2
C
1294 MSC ALICANTE
IMO 9480174
5,550 TEU 2011
9.2
C
1295 LOUIS MAERSK
IMO 9190731
4,045 TEU 2001
9.2
C
1296 MSC TRACY V
IMO 9295177
4,900 TEU 2005
9.2
C
1297 TOKYO EXPRESS
IMO 9193290
4,843 TEU 2000
9.2
C
1298 MAERSK BATAM
IMO 9355331
3,194 TEU 2008
9.2
C
1299 APL FLORIDA
IMO 9350032
6,350 TEU 2008
9.2
C
1300 CONTI CORTESIA
IMO 9293753
8,084 TEU 2005
9.2
C
Page 26 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.