Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,065 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
21.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
+113% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 551 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q4
101
'27 Q1
72
'27 Q2
77
'27 Q3
95
'27 Q4
118
'28 Q1
105
'28 Q2
94
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2051 ILSE D
IMO 9514755
1,036 TEU 2010
21.9
E
2052 KRISTIN SCHEPERS
IMO 9404089
803 TEU 2008
21.9
E
2053 SONATA
IMO 9316103
1,118 TEU 2006
21.9
E
2054 X-PRESS ELBE
IMO 9483669
1,036 TEU 2010
21.9
E
2055 BG EMERALD
IMO 9803704
1,004 TEU 2018
22.0
E
2056 MONTE BRASIL
IMO 9083055
636 TEU 1994
22.0
E
2057 ELBSUN
IMO 9429261
877 TEU 2012
22.0
E
2058 ARNARFELL
IMO 9306005
909 TEU 2005
22.0
E
2059 WILHELM
IMO 9376050
868 TEU 2008
22.0
E
2060 BF PERCH
IMO 9437218
990 TEU 2007
22.1
E
2061 CT PACHUCA
IMO 9344253
750 TEU 2005
22.1
E
2062 WEC VERMEER
IMO 9237371
868 TEU 2001
22.1
E
2063 AVILA
IMO 9295529
887 TEU 2007
22.1
E
2064 MARTINE A
IMO 9020340
1,139 TEU 1993
22.1
E
2065 ELBFEEDER
IMO 9388522
974 TEU 2008
22.1
E
2066 KATHERINE BORCHARD
IMO 9246530
862 TEU 2004
22.1
E
2067 MASTERY D
IMO 9301201
917 TEU 2006
22.2
E
2068 PROS HOPE
IMO 9319557
1,100 TEU 2005
22.2
E
2069 LINDA
IMO 9354325
907 TEU 2007
22.2
E
2070 SPICA J
IMO 9355460
962 TEU 2007
22.3
E
2071 MONTE DA GUIA
IMO 9123788
636 TEU 1995
22.4
E
2072 EDITH
IMO 9328625
750 TEU 2005
22.4
E
2073 WEC VAN EYCK
IMO 9365984
809 TEU 2009
22.5
E
2074 ERASMUS HOPE
IMO 9396634
1,335 TEU 2008
22.6
E
2075 MEDKON LUNA
IMO 9341976
698 TEU 2007
22.6
E
2076 PEGASUS J
IMO 9355434
962 TEU 2006
22.6
E
2077 BJORG
IMO 9231834
868 TEU 2001
22.6
E
2078 ZIM NEW ZEALAND
IMO 9366471
1,155 TEU 2007
22.7
E
2079 PICTOR
IMO 9371426
925 TEU 2009
22.7
E
2080 BF CARP
IMO 9437256
990 TEU 2009
22.9
E
2081 AMELIE BORCHARD
IMO 9242560
868 TEU 2002
22.9
E
2082 AQUARIUS
IMO 9328651
707 TEU 2005
22.9
E
2083 SYNETOS
IMO 9347774
957 TEU 2006
22.9
E
2084 HMO LEADER
IMO 9169811
650 TEU 1997
22.9
E
2085 RUTH
IMO 9376036
868 TEU 2008
23.0
E
2086 CMA CGM DAKHLA
IMO 9461594
1,036 TEU 2008
23.1
E
2087 IPIOS
IMO 9359117
1,118 TEU 2006
23.1
E
2088 FINE SCHEPERS
IMO 9323467
803 TEU 2006
23.1
E
2089 CONTSHIP ONO
IMO 9324978
1,080 TEU 2007
23.1
E
2090 MSC LUNA F
IMO 9308625
916 TEU 2006
23.1
E
2091 MSC TALIA F
IMO 9308601
916 TEU 2005
23.1
E
2092 YERUPAJA
IMO 9412488
880 TEU 2010
23.1
E
2093 DEPE
IMO 9186405
658 TEU 1998
23.2
E
2094 PERSEUS
IMO 9129469
646 TEU 1996
23.2
E
2095 BF LETICIA
IMO 9266542
862 TEU 2003
23.2
E
2096 CARLA
IMO 9319868
750 TEU 2004
23.4
E
2097 CONTSHIP JOY
IMO 9349174
925 TEU 2007
23.4
E
2098 MEANDI
IMO 9328039
803 TEU 2006
23.4
E
2099 ZIM AUSTRALIA
IMO 9366445
1,155 TEU 2007
23.4
E
2100 EINSTEIN
IMO 9483346
1,000 TEU 2012
23.4
E
Page 42 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.