Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,314 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
9.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-7% greener
C
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1301 CONTI CORTESIA
IMO 9293753
8,084 TEU 2005
9.2
C
1302 VAGA MAERSK
IMO 9778545
3,700 TEU 2019
9.2
C
1303 MAERSK NOKWANDA
IMO 9294393
4,045 TEU 2005
9.2
C
1304 MSC POLARIS
IMO 9074042
4,743 TEU 1995
9.2
C
1305 CMA CGM FRANCOISE SAGAN
IMO 9356696
6,661 TEU 2008
9.2
C
1306 X-PRESS SALWEEN
IMO 9862748
1,800 TEU 2021
9.2
C
1307 MAERSK MONTE LINZOR
IMO 9283186
4,000 TEU 2004
9.2
C
1308 MSC ROMA
IMO 9304447
9,200 TEU 2006
9.2
C
1309 MSC CARPATHIA III
IMO 9253038
2,826 TEU 2003
9.2
C
1310 MAERSK OHIO
IMO 9298698
4,300 TEU 2006
9.2
C
1311 STANLEY A
IMO 9303807
2,824 TEU 2003
9.2
C
1312 SEATRADE COLOMBIA
IMO 9976238
23,800 2025
9.2
C
1313 PORTO KAGIO
IMO 9261451
4,492 TEU 2002
9.2
C
1314 MED TRABZON
IMO 9141780
2,052 TEU 1997
9.2
C
1315 VUOKSI MAERSK
IMO 9775775
3,600 TEU 2018
9.2
C
1316 CMA CGM SINTRA
IMO 9961362
2,000 TEU 2024
9.3
C
1317 JOLLY GIADA
IMO 9484522
4,400 TEU 2010
9.3
C
1318 CMA CGM LA TRAVIATA
IMO 9299795
8,200 TEU 2006
9.3
C
1319 HYUNDAI SINGAPORE
IMO 9305685
6,763 TEU 2006
9.3
C
1320 PAOLO
IMO 9389681
4,250 TEU 2008
9.3
C
1321 SEATTLE C
IMO 9360910
4,253 TEU 2007
9.3
C
1322 SC MONTREUX
IMO 9295414
4,132 TEU 2005
9.3
C
1323 OOCL KOBE
IMO 9329526
4,506 TEU 2007
9.3
C
1324 CMA CGM GUARANI
IMO 9234135
2,470 TEU 2002
9.3
C
1325 MSC MADRID
IMO 9480198
5,550 TEU 2011
9.3
C
1326 GSL MYNY
IMO 9213583
5,514 TEU 2000
9.3
C
1327 RAMHAN
IMO 9668960
3,100 TEU 2015
9.4
C
1328 CAPE SKAGEN
IMO 9969857
2,713 TEU 2023
9.4
C
1329 CMA CGM MONTREAL
IMO 9363417
2,401 TEU 2007
9.4
C
1330 MSC HIMANSHI
IMO 9127540
2,006 TEU 1997
9.4
C
1331 SHEKOU STAR
IMO 9322322
4,250 TEU 2007
9.4
C
1332 LEDA MAERSK
IMO 9190755
4,045 TEU 2001
9.4
C
1333 GABRIEL A
IMO 9300659
1,676 TEU 2004
9.4
D
1334 MAERSK MONTANA
IMO 9305312
4,300 TEU 2006
9.4
D
1335 PANDA 001
IMO 9290787
5,527 TEU 2005
9.4
D
1336 MSC CAPRI
IMO 9154220
2,456 TEU 1998
9.4
D
1337 REMAH
IMO 9947720
1,692 TEU 2022
9.4
D
1338 ZIM VIRGINIA
IMO 9231808
4,800 TEU 2002
9.4
D
1339 CMA CGM SPIRIT
IMO 9372860
3,400 TEU 2008
9.4
D
1340 CMA CGM TOPAZ
IMO 9397602
4,300 TEU 2009
9.4
D
1341 MSC MARIA PIA
IMO 9155107
2,808 TEU 1997
9.4
D
1342 KINGSTON
IMO 9389693
4,250 TEU 2008
9.4
D
1343 CALI
IMO 9631101
3,610 TEU 2013
9.4
D
1344 MSC BREMEN
IMO 9369734
5,029 TEU 2007
9.4
D
1345 CAPE SABLE
IMO 9950131
2,700 TEU 2024
9.4
D
1346 MSC DYMPHNA
IMO 9110391
5,711 TEU 1996
9.4
D
1347 LEXA MAERSK
IMO 9190767
3,700 TEU 2001
9.5
D
1348 STADT DRESDEN
IMO 9320049
2,700 TEU 2006
9.5
D
1349 MSC ELIZABETH III
IMO 9215892
2,556 TEU 2001
9.5
D
1350 CAPE CITIUS
IMO 9848742
2,700 TEU 2021
9.5
D
Page 27 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.