Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,040 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
19.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
+39% higher
E

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2001 RIX SPIRIT
IMO 9136204
4,084 1996
19.2
E
2002 FRISIAN INO
IMO 9463877
2,570 2012
19.2
E
2003 FOKKO UKENA
IMO 9375812
3,627 2007
19.2
E
2004 RIX LAKE
IMO 9109043
3,400 1995
19.2
E
2005 HAGLAND BOSS
IMO 9171058
3,694 1997
19.2
E
2006 HAPPY STAR
IMO 9661259
18,062 2014
19.2
E
2007 SARAH-B
IMO 9119622
2,300 1995
19.2
E
2008 FRI PORSGRUNN
IMO 9196199
3,792 2000
19.2
E
2009 WILSON ELBE
IMO 9060675
2,665 1993
19.2
E
2010 FLUVIUS TAVY
IMO 9501710
4,200 2009
19.2
E
2011 AMISIA
IMO 9361378
6,059 2008
19.2
E
2012 CELTIC RAIDER
IMO 9361330
4,537 2007
19.2
E
2013 ELENORA
IMO 9184421
4,023 2000
19.2
E
2014 SPANACO PROGRESS
IMO 9306433
7,601 2007
19.2
E
2015 THEBE
IMO 9199696
2,500 2000
19.2
E
2016 WILSON HUSUM
IMO 9017379
4,219 1998
19.2
E
2017 AURUM
IMO 9248552
16,558 2005
19.2
E
2018 INCRA
IMO 9195858
5,050 2000
19.2
E
2019 DANITA
IMO 9341108
7,018 2005
19.2
E
2020 HAGLAND SAGA
IMO 9238404
4,530 2003
19.2
E
2021 MAI LEHMANN
IMO 9196175
4,135 1999
19.3
E
2022 BBC OPAL
IMO 9506758
14,288 2011
19.3
E
2023 DIEZEBORG
IMO 9225586
8,819 2000
19.3
E
2024 BBC BERGEN
IMO 9437153
8,000 2011
19.3
E
2025 TITAN PEARL
IMO 9589217
6,522 2010
19.3
E
2026 MEMNUNE K
IMO 9576703
4,487 2010
19.3
E
2027 WILSON HANSA
IMO 9583859
4,616 2013
19.3
E
2028 SELENE PRAHM
IMO 9100059
2,422 1994
19.3
E
2029 HAMMER
IMO 9168441
4,902 1998
19.3
E
2030 KRISLIN
IMO 9312377
5,208 2005
19.3
E
2031 SAFFET AGA
IMO 9376282
3,738 2007
19.3
E
2032 MIA MARIA
IMO 9518218
3,748 2012
19.3
E
2033 MAUREEN S
IMO 8707783
3,999 1987
19.3
E
2034 ABERDEEN
IMO 9313723
3,614 2009
19.3
E
2035 ARINDA JOY
IMO 9512422
8,072 2009
19.4
E
2036 WILSON ODRA
IMO 9177882
2,455 1999
19.4
E
2037 ANTWERP
IMO 9375848
3,600 2008
19.4
E
2038 DREAM S
IMO 9199385
4,629 2000
19.4
E
2039 NYSTEIN
IMO 9137284
2,489 1995
19.4
E
2040 ELENA L
IMO 9195901
4,956 2001
19.4
E
2041 KATARIINA
IMO 9467213
4,114 2011
19.4
E
2042 OSTERBOTTEN
IMO 9247120
5,880 2002
19.5
E
2043 INANDI
IMO 8332100
3,465 1984
19.5
E
2044 COE MIEKE
IMO 8912481
2,172 1990
19.5
E
2045 MAJ RICHARD WINTERS
IMO 9210309
7,725 2000
19.5
E
2046 BAL BULK
IMO 8912493
2,165 1990
19.5
E
2047 LUISA
IMO 9471616
17,113 2008
19.6
E
2048 BENIGANE
IMO 9455600
11,818 2008
19.6
E
2049 WILSON WISLA
IMO 9156175
2,517 1996
19.6
E
2050 MUSTAFA YAGCI
IMO 9314545
5,874 2006
19.6
E
Page 41 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.