Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,336 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
26.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
+88% higher
E

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2301 GULF BLUE
IMO 9125073
4,444 1997
24.3
E
2302 HAV SKANDIC
IMO 8719114
3,090 1993
24.4
E
2303 WILSON MONSOON
IMO 9163582
2,780 1997
24.5
E
2304 COE GISELA
IMO 8513314
1,815 1985
24.5
E
2305 HJORDIS
IMO 9126235
6,904 1996
24.5
E
2306 SKOG
IMO 8912039
3,728 1991
24.6
E
2307 FIONA B
IMO 9574303
3,500 2012
24.8
E
2308 GULF ANGEL
IMO 9125059
4,454 1996
24.9
E
2309 BBC FUJI
IMO 9508419
9,266 2011
24.9
E
2310 JUNE
IMO 9155688
2,100 1997
24.9
E
2311 BBC VESUVIUS
IMO 9508471
9,310 2012
24.9
E
2312 INDUSTRIAL DOLPHIN
IMO 9360192
7,996 2007
24.9
E
2313 EMS CALYPSO
IMO 9557393
2,600 2012
25.0
E
2314 MALIK ARCTICA
IMO 9618135
8,438 2017
25.0
E
2315 SCHILLPLATE
IMO 9505285
3,175 2009
25.1
E
2316 WILSON BERGEN
IMO 9557408
2,595 2016
25.1
E
2317 BORKUM
IMO 9457153
5,489 2012
25.1
E
2318 ANA-N
IMO 9416850
3,301 2008
25.3
E
2319 NINA B
IMO 9213703
1,802 2000
25.3
E
2320 RIKKE B
IMO 9574315
3,500 2012
25.4
E
2321 BBC SCANDINAVIA
IMO 9362633
7,534 2007
25.4
E
2322 CARTEN ELINA
IMO 8713653
3,727 1989
25.6
E
2323 RIX MUNTE
IMO 9191254
4,433 1998
25.6
E
2324 FRIENDLAND
IMO 9246906
4,684 2002
25.6
E
2325 GANDA
IMO 9298129
2,637 2003
25.6
E
2326 YUSUF BEY
IMO 9139127
4,766 1997
25.7
E
2327 HOHE BANK
IMO 9505302
3,176 2010
25.8
E
2328 LANGEOOG
IMO 9506136
5,463 2013
25.9
E
2329 NORRBOTTEN
IMO 9191931
5,527 2001
25.9
E
2330 HILDA B
IMO 9466233
3,500 2011
25.9
E
2331 BBC EVEREST
IMO 9508407
9,310 2011
26.0
E
2332 SPIEKEROOG
IMO 9506148
5,488 2013
26.0
E
2333 MAY B
IMO 9138757
2,398 1996
26.1
E
2334 ARINA
IMO 9173446
5,001 1989
26.1
E
2335 WILSON ROTTERDAM
IMO 9557381
2,600 2017
26.1
E
2336 WILSON SAAR
IMO 9125841
1,687 1996
26.2
E
2337 TALINA B
IMO 9466221
3,500 2010
26.2
E
2338 SCOT BAY
IMO 9243930
3,154 2001
26.3
E
2339 PANORMITIS
IMO 8509038
1,533 1985
26.4
E
2340 SCOT MARINER
IMO 9243916
3,313 2001
26.4
E
2341 CONSTANCE
IMO 9505338
3,196 2011
26.4
E
2342 SCAN FJELL
IMO 8405878
3,040 1985
26.5
E
2343 BBC NAPLES
IMO 9484223
9,775 2010
26.6
E
2344 MARIANNE DANICA
IMO 9006241
2,200 1993
26.6
E
2345 ATLANTIS
IMO 8721533
3,337 1988
26.7
E
2346 LAURA
IMO 9126223
6,940 1996
26.9
E
2347 SONORO
IMO 9199397
4,077 2000
26.9
E
2348 TITUS
IMO 9195470
4,299 2006
26.9
E
2349 NORDERNEY
IMO 9506124
5,475 2012
27.1
E
2350 MOHSEN
IMO 8703270
7,443 1987
27.1
E
Page 47 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.