Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,825 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
17.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.95)
+28% higher
D

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.13
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.48
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1801 SUA
IMO 9436276
7,502 2009
17.7
D
1802 WILSON HOOK
IMO 9017434
4,280 2003
17.7
D
1803 KADRI
IMO 9114725
4,955 1995
17.7
D
1804 MILLERNTOR
IMO 9265665
4,352 2003
17.8
D
1805 HUNZEDIJK
IMO 9515022
4,891 2011
17.8
D
1806 RIX EIRA
IMO 9057226
3,186 1992
17.8
D
1807 ARMARA JULES VERNE
IMO 9195717
3,785 2001
17.8
D
1808 MUHAMMET GUMUSTAS 6
IMO 8509832
3,065 1985
17.8
D
1809 HIMMEL
IMO 9518414
4,496 2010
17.8
D
1810 LADY HAYAT
IMO 9075450
5,264 1995
17.8
D
1811 BBC EDGE
IMO 9407598
10,323 2009
17.8
D
1812 KAIRIT
IMO 9195949
4,956 2000
17.8
D
1813 KAISA
IMO 9333462
4,528 2005
17.8
D
1814 MARTENITSA
IMO 9138733
2,913 1996
17.8
D
1815 RIX VOYAGER
IMO 9125671
4,241 1997
17.9
D
1816 ARKLOW VENUS
IMO 9772591
5,171 2018
17.9
D
1817 LADY AYAN
IMO 9197480
5,211 2000
17.9
D
1818 RIZECEM
IMO 7903249
5,278 1979
17.9
D
1819 WILSON BREST
IMO 9126900
3,704 1995
17.9
D
1820 WILSON PALMA
IMO 9368417
4,624 2009
17.9
D
1821 GERMAN SKY
IMO 9125047
4,450 1996
17.9
D
1822 WILSON POLA
IMO 9344526
4,960 2007
17.9
D
1823 WILSON HUMBER
IMO 9017381
4,249 1996
17.9
D
1824 SEA MELODY
IMO 9195638
3,783 2002
17.9
D
1825 EMSTAL
IMO 9356878
3,701 2007
17.9
D
1826 KETTER
IMO 9195860
5,050 2000
17.9
D
1827 FINNLAND
IMO 9301598
7,099 2006
17.9
D
1828 BBC LONDON
IMO 9513658
7,893 2011
17.9
D
1829 WILSON HANSTHOLM
IMO 9119567
4,310 1998
17.9
D
1830 SIDER RODI
IMO 9522001
8,520 2010
17.9
D
1831 TARZAN
IMO 9128336
4,198 1995
17.9
D
1832 NAOMI-B
IMO 9557367
2,600 2013
17.9
D
1833 ANITA
IMO 9479577
2,570 2013
17.9
D
1834 ICELANDICA HAV
IMO 8128884
2,325 1982
17.9
D
1835 OSTBENSE
IMO 9566784
7,300 2011
17.9
D
1836 SEA TRADER
IMO 9364007
6,355 2007
17.9
D
1837 CUERA
IMO 9360489
4,582 2008
17.9
D
1838 WILSON LEITH
IMO 9150509
3,865 1997
17.9
D
1839 HELGA G.
IMO 1029053
3,798 2025
18.0
D
1840 AMUESA
IMO 9320805
5,045 2007
18.0
D
1841 ASLI ELIF
IMO 9349021
3,701 2005
18.0
D
1842 ISARTAL
IMO 9313670
3,712 2005
18.0
D
1843 SNP STAR
IMO 9345362
3,987 2006
18.0
D
1844 WILSON BRAKE
IMO 9150511
3,863 1997
18.0
D
1845 RIX ONYX
IMO 9508639
4,742 2010
18.0
D
1846 LADY BERNA
IMO 9214733
5,604 2003
18.0
D
1847 JELENA
IMO 9519042
5,400 2012
18.0
D
1848 KAARI
IMO 9434761
7,100 2009
18.0
D
1849 ALI AKAY
IMO 9358759
6,257 2007
18.0
D
1850 SILVA
IMO 9237010
5,464 2001
18.0
D
Page 37 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.