Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,109 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
17.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.91)
+63% higher
E

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 236 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
44
Q4
41
'27 Q1
39
'27 Q2
34
'27 Q3
34
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
34
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 678 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 678 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 578 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

247
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (247 of 247 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.21
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1101 ALEXANDRA
IMO 9196163
8,865 2000
17.6
E
1102 BBC EDGE
IMO 9407598
10,323 2009
17.6
E
1103 BOCS VISION
IMO 9359961
12,584 2008
17.6
E
1104 JSP VENTO
IMO 9570656
7,930 2011
17.6
E
1105 CDRY BROWN
IMO 9469302
8,537 2010
17.8
E
1106 GRIGORY MALOV
IMO 8986365
6,098 1986
17.8
E
1107 SEA LEADER
IMO 9363998
6,355 2007
17.8
E
1108 AK HAMZA
IMO 9338125
7,600 2005
17.8
E
1109 SUNNY LYNN
IMO 9124926
8,292 1995
17.8
E
1110 DIEZEBORG
IMO 9225586
8,819 2000
17.8
E
1111 MANISA KATE / LOENERBORG
IMO 9421099
8,111 2008
17.9
E
1112 PALMGRACHT
IMO 9424558
19,413 2010
17.9
E
1113 BBC TOPAZ
IMO 9506734
14,288 2010
17.9
E
1114 FWN PERFORMER
IMO 9770701
10,620 2017
17.9
E
1115 BURHAN DIZMAN
IMO 9381809
7,728 2007
17.9
E
1116 DAIANA
IMO 9610509
8,546 2011
17.9
E
1117 ROYAL I
IMO 9347633
11,169 2007
18.0
E
1118 LAPPLAND
IMO 9505132
6,500 2020
18.1
E
1119 VASTERBOTTEN
IMO 9436226
6,805 2008
18.1
E
1120 WAALBORG
IMO 9505546
9,611 2010
18.1
E
1121 ARINDA JOY
IMO 9512422
8,072 2009
18.2
E
1122 LEONID ZAYAKIN
IMO 8972259
6,098 1986
18.3
E
1123 MANISA GRETA
IMO 9391024
8,419 2007
18.3
E
1124 SPANACO PROGRESS
IMO 9306433
7,601 2007
18.3
E
1125 SIDER RODI
IMO 9522001
8,520 2010
18.4
E
1126 JOY X
IMO 9428774
7,800 2007
18.4
E
1127 BEAUTRITON
IMO 9428669
7,210 2009
18.5
E
1128 AMIR JOY
IMO 9205706
9,791 2000
18.5
E
1129 BOCS SPIRIT
IMO 9359959
12,584 2008
18.5
E
1130 JOY LINE
IMO 9370094
14,376 2007
18.5
E
1131 FINNLAND
IMO 9301598
7,099 2006
18.5
E
1132 ENDURANCE
IMO 9647318
7,825 2012
18.6
E
1133 AK AMBITION
IMO 9306421
7,600 2006
18.6
E
1134 MOHSEN
IMO 8703270
7,443 1987
18.6
E
1135 ASG PORTOFINO
IMO 9229087
7,796 2002
18.7
E
1136 MOLENGRACHT
IMO 9571533
12,196 2012
18.8
E
1137 BBC DESTINY
IMO 9347839
8,834 2006
18.8
E
1138 HERBEIRA
IMO 9439216
7,796 2008
18.8
E
1139 MAJ RICHARD WINTERS
IMO 9210309
7,725 2000
18.9
E
1140 MISSOURIBORG
IMO 9228978
9,687 2000
18.9
E
1141 MADDOX
IMO 8908844
16,883 1995
18.9
E
1142 DONA BLE
IMO 9142540
9,221 1997
18.9
E
1143 ALTO
IMO 9277333
7,701 2004
19.0
E
1144 MSC ADA F
IMO 9190119
14,000 2000
19.0
E
1145 WISLABORG
IMO 9505560
9,698 2011
19.1
E
1146 SEELAND
IMO 9301603
7,064 2006
19.1
E
1147 NYLAND
IMO 9436240
6,805 2009
19.2
E
1148 BIGLIFT BARENTSZ
IMO 9710464
20,098 2016
19.3
E
1149 DANITA
IMO 9341108
7,018 2005
19.3
E
1150 ALAND
IMO 9350783
7,056 2007
19.5
E
Page 23 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.