Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#778 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
13.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
+20% higher
D

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,033B 687C 506D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 274 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
59
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
38
'27 Q4
55
'28 Q1
45
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 789 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 789 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 681 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 570 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 102 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
751 TRANSBAY
IMO 9187033
17,539 1999
12.8
D
752 MANISA SOFIA
IMO 9428396
12,500 2011
12.8
D
753 VIRGINIABORG
IMO 9234290
9,861 2001
12.8
D
754 GOTLAND
IMO 9480136
17,409 2011
12.8
D
755 JOY EXPRESS
IMO 9378254
9,693 2006
12.8
D
756 ALAMOSBORG
IMO 9466348
17,294 2011
12.8
D
757 ESL EUROPA
IMO 9333553
17,300 2007
12.8
D
758 FREYJA W
IMO 9754422
12,245 2018
12.9
D
759 FWN STAR
IMO 9721645
10,546 2015
12.9
D
760 ARKLOW MUSE
IMO 9509487
15,008 2013
12.9
D
761 ALBANYBORG
IMO 9466300
17,294 2010
12.9
D
762 FRIEDRICH
IMO 9594298
8,690 2012
12.9
D
763 FRIGG W
IMO 9754410
12,247 2017
12.9
D
764 SAMPOGRACHT
IMO 9288071
23,741 2005
12.9
D
765 MICK
IMO 9736183
12,234 2019
12.9
D
766 QAMUTIK
IMO 9081289
12,760 1994
12.9
D
767 COE LUISA
IMO 9435026
12,669 2008
13.0
D
768 ARKLOW MOOR
IMO 9509475
14,998 2011
13.0
D
769 EKMEN GLORY
IMO 9384186
8,555 2007
13.0
D
770 AMIRA JOY
IMO 9558452
8,500 2009
13.0
D
771 KEITH
IMO 9736195
12,234 2019
13.0
D
772 VESTANHAV
IMO 9504152
9,927 2012
13.0
D
773 GWEN
IMO 9402067
12,693 2008
13.0
D
774 UAL HARRIER
IMO 9594303
8,690 2012
13.0
D
775 BLUE CAPRAMAR
IMO 9641845
7,799 2012
13.0
D
776 ZEA SERVANT
IMO 9741126
12,302 2018
13.1
D
777 ORIS JUL
IMO 9116084
8,258 1996
13.1
D
778 KELLY
IMO 9255622
9,857 2004
13.1
D
779 NUNALIK
IMO 9466996
12,662 2009
13.1
D
780 ANKA BLUE
IMO 9317808
8,181 2005
13.1
D
781 MSC SHEILA F
IMO 9180968
16,211 1999
13.1
D
782 MARIO C
IMO 9364526
13,422 2019
13.1
D
783 CHARLIE
IMO 9736236
12,234 2022
13.1
D
784 UAL HOUSTON
IMO 9542348
8,703 2012
13.1
D
785 DZ YANTAI
IMO 9247405
17,539 2001
13.1
D
786 ARKLOW BRAVE
IMO 9638800
8,661 2015
13.2
D
787 ARKLOW MANOR
IMO 9440241
14,998 2009
13.2
D
788 ARISTO
IMO 9229116
9,682 2000
13.2
D
789 EKMEN SKY
IMO 9384174
8,523 2006
13.2
D
790 FINN II
IMO 9534468
10,049 2012
13.2
D
791 ONEGO CAPRI
IMO 9245275
10,273 2002
13.2
D
792 SPAARNEGRACHT
IMO 9202558
21,402 2000
13.2
D
793 UAL AFRICA
IMO 9529243
8,327 2011
13.3
D
794 SUOMIGRACHT
IMO 9288057
23,660 2004
13.3
D
795 AMSTELBORG
IMO 9333527
17,356 2006
13.3
D
796 TIDE NAVIGATOR
IMO 9526083
8,284 2011
13.3
D
797 ESL AMERICA
IMO 9347035
17,349 2006
13.3
D
798 EKMEN STAR
IMO 9218193
7,580 2001
13.3
D
799 AZORESBORG
IMO 9466051
17,407 2010
13.3
D
800 SEAWAY K
IMO 9177777
13,347 1999
13.3
D
Page 16 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.