Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#144 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
5.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
-63% greener
A

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
101 EAGLE ARROW
IMO 9529592
62,967 2011
4.8
A
102 OCEANA SKY
IMO 9189938
50,655 1998
4.8
A
103 EIKE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9794472
38,520 2017
4.8
A
104 GOLD OAK
IMO 9806342
37,732 2017
4.8
A
107 GREEN HELSINKI
IMO 9976068
68,023 2023
4.8
A
106 HOSANGER
IMO 9081801
50,211 1995
4.8
A
105 CALYPSO.GR
IMO 9785134
37,865 2017
4.8
A
108 ESTRELLA
IMO 9477270
50,448 2012
4.8
A
109 SOUND PEARL
IMO 9452907
52,125 2011
4.8
A
110 CHANNEL PEARL
IMO 9644550
50,633 2012
4.8
A
111 POLSTEAM OKRA
IMO 9984819
37,592 2025
4.9
A
112 COSCO SHIPPING HONOR
IMO 9881653
62,013 2020
4.9
A
113 POLAND PEARL
IMO 9731236
45,474 2015
4.9
A
115 AFRICAN PIPIT
IMO 9890903
37,636 2020
4.9
A
114 JU FU
IMO 1072828
61,347 2025
4.9
A
117 COSCO SHIPPING GRACE
IMO 9928865
61,614 2021
4.9
A
116 BERGE JUNGFRAU
IMO 9846304
37,683 2019
4.9
A
118 FERUSA R
IMO 9668556
37,429 2014
4.9
A
119 AFRICAN RAVEN
IMO 9700287
37,711 2014
4.9
A
120 SAGA FALCON
IMO 9613848
55,596 2012
4.9
A
121 TATUNG
IMO 9811921
37,685 2018
4.9
A
125 DEVBULK KAYA
IMO 9530711
40,527 2012
4.9
A
124 OPTIMANA
IMO 9253856
57,599 2003
4.9
A
123 AMBER CONFIDENCE
IMO 9866550
37,720 2020
4.9
A
122 SAGA DISCOVERY
IMO 9317418
46,618 2006
4.9
A
126 LOUISE
IMO 9470301
37,207 2012
4.9
A
127 TUJU ARROW
IMO 9443920
72,863 2010
4.9
A
128 GREEN ITAQUI
IMO 9976410
64,996 2024
4.9
A
129 CANADA PEARL
IMO 9659749
45,566 2014
5.0
A
131 SAGA VOYAGER
IMO 9233454
46,882 2001
5.0
A
130 SAGA ODYSSEY
IMO 9401788
46,500 2008
5.0
A
133 POLSTEAM PILE
IMO 9971886
37,592 2024
5.0
A
132 VELVET
IMO 9782651
37,324 2021
5.0
A
134 DRINA S
IMO 9635743
38,037 2012
5.0
A
135 BBC MARS
IMO 9947770
40,297 2022
5.0
A
136 PUFFIN ARROW
IMO 9566605
62,967 2011
5.0
A
138 STAR HARMONIA
IMO 9103130
46,604 1998
5.0
A
137 HOYANGER
IMO 9100073
50,194 1995
5.0
A
139 SAGA MONAL
IMO 9117739
56,801 1996
5.0
A
141 SAGA FUTURE
IMO 9613836
55,596 2012
5.1
A
140 STAR KINN
IMO 9396141
49,850 2010
5.1
A
142 STAR JAVA
IMO 9310513
44,692 2006
5.1
A
143 POLSTEAM KOPROWO
IMO 9971862
37,592 2024
5.1
A
144 STAR HANSA
IMO 9103128
46,428 1995
5.1
A
148 POLSTEAM LEBSKO
IMO 9971874
37,574 2024
5.1
A
147 UNI BLOSSOM
IMO 9816567
37,634 2018
5.1
A
146 PANAMANA
IMO 9401805
58,022 2010
5.1
A
145 ADASUN
IMO 9747053
34,483 2017
5.1
A
150 STAR LYSEFJORD
IMO 9616840
50,728 2014
5.1
A
149 POLSTEAM INSKO
IMO 9984833
37,630 2025
5.1
A
Page 3 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.