Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#820 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
7.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-28% greener
B
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
801 W KAMPALA
IMO 9215311
6,802 TEU 2001
7.3
B
802 KOBE EXPRESS
IMO 9143544
4,612 TEU 1997
7.4
B
805 MSC ELLEN
IMO 9166780
7,226 TEU 1999
7.4
B
804 MSC HEIDI
IMO 9309473
8,400 TEU 2006
7.4
B
803 MSC SWEDEN VI
IMO 9231262
5,762 TEU 2002
7.4
B
806 ONE HONG KONG
IMO 9395161
8,212 TEU 2009
7.4
B
811 APL MEXICO CITY
IMO 9632210
9,200 TEU 2011
7.4
B
810 COSCO SHANGHAI
IMO 9221097
5,618 TEU 2001
7.4
B
809 CMA CGM JEAN GABRIEL
IMO 9729128
9,400 TEU 2018
7.4
B
808 MSC TAERIM
IMO 9966984
1,800 TEU 2024
7.4
B
807 MAERSK GIRONDE
IMO 9235555
4,318 TEU 2002
7.4
B
812 SAN DIEGO
IMO 9398412
7,500 TEU 2010
7.4
B
813 NYK VESTA
IMO 9312808
9,012 TEU 2007
7.4
B
814 SHIJING
IMO 9348663
5,100 TEU 2007
7.4
B
816 MEHUIN
IMO 9400100
6,300 TEU 2011
7.4
B
815 ZIM VIETNAM
IMO 9244922
6,246 TEU 2003
7.4
B
818 CMA CGM ERMITAGE
IMO 9961295
2,000 TEU 2024
7.4
B
817 MSC BETTINA
IMO 9399038
10,000 TEU 2010
7.4
B
819 CAPE SCOTT
IMO 9950117
2,700 TEU 2023
7.4
B
822 MSC MATILDE V
IMO 9181663
4,500 TEU 1998
7.4
B
821 GENOA EXPRESS
IMO 9626041
3,800 TEU 2014
7.4
B
823 KARLSKRONA
IMO 9085558
6,000 TEU 1996
7.4
B
820 NYK DIANA
IMO 9337688
4,888 TEU 2008
7.4
B
824 MSC BRUNELLA
IMO 9702106
8,819 TEU 2015
7.4
B
826 COSCO ANTWERP
IMO 9246396
5,618 TEU 2001
7.4
B
825 MSC GREENWICH
IMO 9286267
8,189 TEU 2004
7.4
B
827 NYK RUMINA
IMO 9416991
4,888 TEU 2010
7.5
B
828 MSC ROMANE
IMO 9745653
9,400 TEU 2017
7.5
B
830 MSC MICHIGAN VII
IMO 9196864
6,420 TEU 2000
7.5
B
829 CMA CGM TAGE
IMO 9674555
9,365 TEU 2015
7.5
B
832 MSC SAMANTHA VI
IMO 9110377
5,551 TEU 1996
7.5
B
831 CMA CGM IMAGINATION
IMO 9948231
6,874 TEU 2024
7.5
B
833 MSC ELA
IMO 9282259
4,900 TEU 2004
7.5
B
835 MSC SINDY
IMO 9336048
9,200 TEU 2007
7.5
B
834 ONE HAMMERSMITH
IMO 9395147
8,212 TEU 2009
7.5
B
836 RDO CONCORD
IMO 9401283
6,500 TEU 2009
7.5
B
838 MSC BRIANNA
IMO 9103685
4,507 TEU 1996
7.5
B
839 MSC SANTHYA
IMO 8913411
2,668 TEU 1991
7.5
B
837 MSC LAGOS X
IMO 9605152
9,400 TEU 2013
7.5
B
841 HELLA
IMO 9535137
5,605 TEU 2011
7.5
C
840 MARCOS V
IMO 9307059
6,350 TEU 2005
7.5
C
844 MSC NERISSA V
IMO 9278155
5,050 TEU 2004
7.5
C
843 CMA CGM RUNDALE
IMO 9961300
2,000 TEU 2024
7.5
C
842 ZIM AMERICA
IMO 9244934
6,246 TEU 2003
7.5
C
849 MSC DENMARK VI
IMO 9231250
5,762 TEU 2002
7.5
C
848 MSC CHANNE
IMO 9710438
8,800 TEU 2015
7.5
C
847 BREMEN
IMO 9450387
8,600 TEU 2009
7.5
C
846 MSC ORIANE
IMO 9372482
5,782 TEU 2008
7.5
C
845 MSC VIDHI
IMO 9238739
5,514 TEU 2001
7.5
C
850 MAERSK GENOA
IMO 9739680
10,100 TEU 2016
7.5
C
Page 17 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.