Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#170 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
5.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
-62% greener
A

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
151 SSI PROVIDENCE
IMO 9883065
37,899 2020
5.1
A
152 HARDANGER
IMO 9079119
50,198 1995
5.1
A
153 SAGA JANDAIA
IMO 9200421
47,027 1998
5.2
A
154 STAR ISTIND
IMO 9182954
46,428 1999
5.2
A
156 JACAMAR ARROW
IMO 9007532
46,998 1992
5.2
A
155 STAR GATE
IMO 9400875
32,280 2009
5.2
A
157 INLAND SEA
IMO 9675731
37,543 2014
5.2
A
158 SAGA FRONTIER
IMO 9343510
46,550 2007
5.2
A
160 SAGA WIND
IMO 9074078
47,053 1994
5.2
A
159 STAR KVARVEN
IMO 9396153
49,856 2010
5.2
A
161 ATLAS S
IMO 9491575
34,478 2011
5.2
A
163 DEVBULK BEGUM
IMO 9625607
32,309 2012
5.2
A
162 SAGA ENTERPRISE
IMO 9343481
46,550 2006
5.2
A
165 STAR MAJESTY
IMO 9355525
50,790 2009
5.2
A
164 DARIUS
IMO 9757943
33,426 2017
5.2
A
166 EDGAR OLDENDORFF
IMO 9794484
38,545 2017
5.2
A
167 STAR MAIA
IMO 9189940
50,655 1998
5.3
A
169 BERGE SNAEFELL
IMO 9816593
37,739 2018
5.3
A
168 JAMNO
IMO 9767716
36,609 2018
5.3
A
171 STAR HIDRA
IMO 9071569
46,547 1994
5.3
A
170 BRAVE ARSENAL
IMO 9616101
33,383 2013
5.3
A
172 SSI MARVELOUS
IMO 9615327
37,062 2013
5.3
A
173 STAR LYGRA
IMO 9616838
50,741 2013
5.3
A
174 DEVBULK DEMET
IMO 9625592
32,309 2012
5.3
A
176 BERGE GALDHOPIGGEN
IMO 9753284
38,907 2017
5.3
A
175 SAGA JOURNEY
IMO 9363637
46,652 2007
5.3
A
177 SAGA FUJI
IMO 9609457
55,973 2013
5.3
A
178 BERGE SHARI
IMO 9713208
34,534 2016
5.3
A
179 SSI RELIANCE
IMO 9655224
36,058 2015
5.3
A
180 WECO JOSEFINE
IMO 9779020
38,592 2018
5.4
A
183 SIDER MONTEDIPROCIDA
IMO 9868443
37,661 2020
5.4
A
182 QUETZAL ARROW
IMO 9007544
46,908 1992
5.4
A
181 FEDERAL RUHR
IMO 9766176
36,575 2017
5.4
A
185 SAGA CREST
IMO 9014066
47,069 1994
5.4
A
184 AFRICAN GROUSE
IMO 9755737
37,700 2013
5.4
A
186 NEGMAR CICEK
IMO 9542685
31,997 2011
5.4
A
187 VICTORIA
IMO 9336828
50,223 2006
5.4
A
190 COOL HERO
IMO 9609354
34,481 2015
5.4
A
189 POLSTEAM DABIE
IMO 9971850
37,592 2024
5.4
A
188 BALKAN MARIN
IMO 9416434
38,070 2010
5.4
A
191 SPICA ETERNITY
IMO 9832468
36,908 2019
5.4
A
193 SAGA FANTASY
IMO 9658953
55,973 2013
5.4
A
192 HERANGER
IMO 9079121
50,198 1995
5.4
A
194 TIBERBORG
IMO 9546473
21,301 2013
5.4
A
196 SAGA ADVENTURE
IMO 9317406
46,627 2005
5.4
A
195 BC AMBITION
IMO 9908358
37,982 2021
5.4
A
197 JETOUR
IMO 9317377
54,881 2006
5.4
A
198 SUNNY GRACE
IMO 9343522
52,223 2006
5.4
A
200 DEMA M
IMO 9255074
32,259 2003
5.5
A
199 SAGA ANDORINHA
IMO 9197002
47,027 1998
5.5
A
Page 4 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.