Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,802 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
17.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
+27% higher
D

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1801 WILSON HARRIER
IMO 9064891
4,206 1993
17.7
D
1802 SYRENA
IMO 9508641
5,463 2010
17.7
D
1803 MARIA G
IMO 8205187
1,685 1984
17.7
D
1804 SUURHUSEN.S
IMO 9123245
4,261 1995
17.7
D
1805 KREETE
IMO 9279408
3,999 2003
17.7
D
1806 ORIENTAL
IMO 9085077
5,501 1994
17.7
D
1807 VERTOM MARJOLIJN
IMO 9507350
3,584 2010
17.7
D
1808 WILSON HOOK
IMO 9017434
4,280 2004
17.7
D
1809 SUA
IMO 9436276
7,502 2009
17.7
D
1810 AMADEUS AQUAMARIJN
IMO 9223423
2,688 2000
17.7
D
1811 ALI AKAY
IMO 9358759
6,350 2007
17.7
D
1812 KADRI
IMO 9114725
4,955 1995
17.7
D
1813 HUNZEDIJK
IMO 9515022
4,891 2011
17.8
D
1814 MILLERNTOR
IMO 9265665
4,352 2003
17.8
D
1815 RIX EIRA
IMO 9057226
3,186 1992
17.8
D
1816 PRIMA LADY
IMO 9195652
3,400 1999
17.8
D
1817 HIMMEL
IMO 9518414
4,496 2010
17.8
D
1818 LADY HAYAT
IMO 9075450
5,264 1995
17.8
D
1819 FEMBRIA
IMO 9350771
7,400 2006
17.8
D
1820 BBC EDGE
IMO 9407598
10,323 2009
17.8
D
1821 KAIRIT
IMO 9195949
4,956 2000
17.8
D
1822 KAISA
IMO 9333462
4,528 2005
17.8
D
1823 EKNOE
IMO 9353395
4,568 2006
17.8
D
1824 RIX VOYAGER
IMO 9125671
4,241 1997
17.9
D
1825 ARKLOW VENUS
IMO 9772591
5,171 2018
17.9
D
1826 LADY AYAN
IMO 9197480
5,211 2000
17.9
D
1827 RIZECEM
IMO 7903249
5,278 1979
17.9
D
1828 WILSON BREST
IMO 9126900
3,704 1995
17.9
D
1829 WILSON PALMA
IMO 9368417
4,624 2009
17.9
D
1830 WILSON POLA
IMO 9344526
4,960 2007
17.9
D
1831 SEA MELODY
IMO 9195638
3,783 2002
17.9
D
1832 WILSON HUMBER
IMO 9017381
4,249 1999
17.9
D
1833 EMSTAL
IMO 9356878
3,701 2007
17.9
D
1834 KETTER
IMO 9195860
5,050 2000
17.9
D
1835 FINNLAND
IMO 9301598
7,099 2006
17.9
D
1836 WILSON HANSTHOLM
IMO 9119567
4,310 1998
17.9
D
1837 TARZAN
IMO 9128336
4,198 1995
17.9
D
1838 SIDER RODI
IMO 9522001
8,520 2010
17.9
D
1839 BBC LONDON
IMO 9513658
7,893 2011
17.9
D
1840 ICELANDICA HAV
IMO 8128884
2,325 1982
17.9
D
1841 ANITA
IMO 9479577
2,570 2013
17.9
D
1842 NAOMI-B
IMO 9557367
2,600 2013
17.9
D
1843 SEA TRADER
IMO 9364007
6,355 2007
17.9
D
1844 WILSON LEITH
IMO 9150509
3,865 1997
17.9
D
1845 CUERA
IMO 9360489
4,582 2008
17.9
D
1846 C.POLARIS
IMO 9356866
3,803 2007
17.9
D
1847 HELGA G.
IMO 1029053
3,798 2025
18.0
D
1848 ISARTAL
IMO 9313670
3,712 2005
18.0
D
1849 LELIE C
IMO 9166443
3,697 2000
18.0
D
1850 ASLI ELIF
IMO 9349021
3,701 2005
18.0
D
Page 37 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.