Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#451 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
7.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-28% greener
B

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.79
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
452 HAFNIA ARONALDO
IMO 9711561
38,506 2015
7.1
B
451 RUI FU TAI
IMO 9258600
47,122 2004
7.1
B
453 BOW FAGUS
IMO 9047764
37,375 1995
7.1
B
454 OPERA
IMO 9804887
37,245 2020
7.1
B
455 ECO REVOLUTION
IMO 9725598
39,208 2016
7.2
B
457 DEE4 JUNIPER
IMO 9930923
49,999 2020
7.2
B
456 VERIGE
IMO 9401128
52,725 2010
7.2
B
458 ANDREA VICTORY
IMO 9288849
47,210 2005
7.2
B
460 APIASTOS
IMO 9365374
49,997 2007
7.2
B
459 NCC SAMA
IMO 9480150
45,471 2012
7.2
B
461 BOW STAR
IMO 9197296
49,487 2004
7.2
B
462 STOLT GLORY
IMO 9311012
33,929 2005
7.2
B
464 SUPERBA
IMO 9538165
37,949 2014
7.2
B
463 HAFNIA MAGELLAN
IMO 9725615
39,067 2015
7.2
B
465 STORE BAY
IMO 9733698
30,711 2015
7.2
B
466 CARTAGENA
IMO 9389318
46,923 2009
7.2
B
467 BOCHEM GHENT
IMO 9565649
33,628 2011
7.2
B
468 STOLT SYPRESS
IMO 9150315
36,677 1998
7.2
B
469 ANTARES
IMO 9800817
40,356 2022
7.2
B
471 HAFNIA ALMANDINE
IMO 9714068
38,506 2015
7.2
B
470 FAITHFUL STAR
IMO 9228320
34,465 2000
7.2
B
474 HAFNIA VALENTINO
IMO 9692246
49,126 2015
7.3
B
473 STOLT BRELAND
IMO 9414084
43,475 2010
7.3
B
472 UOG DESPINA V
IMO 9425318
49,999 2010
7.3
B
475 BOCHEM HOUSTON
IMO 9955428
26,611 2021
7.3
B
476 BOW AQUARIUS
IMO 9753791
40,900 2016
7.3
B
478 THEANOULA
IMO 9935557
39,855 2022
7.3
B
477 BOW SIRIUS
IMO 9215294
49,539 2006
7.3
B
480 REGUETON
IMO 9411989
37,872 2009
7.3
B
479 HAFNIA AZOTIC
IMO 9719757
38,506 2013
7.3
B
481 SEA CUMULUS
IMO 9724532
39,999 2016
7.3
B
482 MEDALTA ADVENTURER
IMO 9761451
30,727 2015
7.3
B
485 BOW CAPRICORN
IMO 9752010
40,929 2014
7.3
B
484 LUCKY SAILOR
IMO 9464352
37,596 2009
7.3
B
483 HW OTTO
IMO 9394040
40,435 2007
7.3
B
486 HAFNIA AMETRINE
IMO 9714513
38,506 2015
7.3
B
487 BOW CECIL
IMO 9143219
37,369 1998
7.3
B
490 WISDOM STAR
IMO 9278674
34,528 2003
7.3
B
489 MANDAL
IMO 9732773
37,596 2016
7.3
B
488 MILANO
IMO 9286059
37,305 2005
7.3
B
491 VELOS AQUARIUS
IMO 9381756
49,999 2008
7.3
B
492 STENA IMAGE
IMO 9667473
49,719 2015
7.3
B
494 THE JUDGE
IMO 9755725
37,770 2016
7.4
B
495 BOW GEMINI
IMO 9752034
40,895 2017
7.4
B
493 STOLT BELUGA
IMO 9613965
33,552 2013
7.4
B
497 BOW FIRDA
IMO 9250751
37,427 2003
7.4
B
496 NCC HUDA
IMO 9399272
45,459 2011
7.4
B
500 GULF HUWAYLAT
IMO 9359870
45,967 2008
7.4
B
499 BRISTOL TRADER
IMO 9737101
35,863 2016
7.4
B
498 ZEZE START
IMO 9392781
49,999 2009
7.4
B
Page 10 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.