Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,042 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
16.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
+50% higher
E

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1001 WILSON NEWPORT
IMO 9430985
8,691 2011
15.7
E
1002 MORGENSTOND II
IMO 9367073
12,102 2007
15.7
E
1003 DONGEBORG
IMO 9163697
8,832 1999
15.7
E
1004 ANNIE
IMO 9468097
12,654 2010
15.7
E
1005 WILSON NORFOLK
IMO 9430997
8,683 2011
15.7
E
1006 SMALAND
IMO 9277321
7,701 2004
15.7
E
1007 HC EVA MARIE
IMO 9369071
11,121 2007
15.8
E
1008 ROZ Y
IMO 9499931
8,811 2008
15.8
E
1009 HADELAND
IMO 9505601
9,692 2011
15.8
E
1010 DONAU
IMO 9385908
8,267 2011
15.8
E
1011 ST.MARIA
IMO 9467134
19,404 2011
15.8
E
1012 WILSON NICE
IMO 9430959
8,689 2010
15.9
E
1013 HUDSONGRACHT
IMO 9433262
12,709 2008
15.9
E
1014 AZOV CONFIDENCE
IMO 9372602
10,255 2007
15.9
E
1015 ONEGO TRADER
IMO 9238351
8,930 2001
15.9
E
1016 MARIETJE NORA
IMO 9481609
9,068 2015
15.9
E
1017 MARIETJE MARSILLA
IMO 9458248
8,491 2010
15.9
E
1018 MAGOTHY
IMO 9418975
19,397 2009
15.9
E
1019 KARSOY
IMO 9555618
10,563 2009
15.9
E
1020 LYSVIK SEAWAYS
IMO 9144251
7,500 1998
15.9
E
1021 HEERENGRACHT
IMO 9435753
12,678 2009
15.9
E
1022 FLORIJNGRACHT
IMO 9428413
12,200 2010
15.9
E
1023 MEROVING
IMO 9453614
7,224 2009
15.9
E
1024 MOEZELBORG
IMO 9180839
9,200 1999
15.9
E
1025 MORNING TIDE
IMO 9320506
12,008 2006
16.0
E
1026 LILA MOMBASA
IMO 9235359
30,530 2003
16.0
E
1027 HC OPAL
IMO 9377846
11,185 2010
16.0
E
1028 ARNE
IMO 9142564
9,678 1998
16.0
E
1029 ICS SILVER LINING
IMO 9314351
12,578 2005
16.0
E
1030 HAPPY RANGER
IMO 9139311
15,443 1998
16.1
E
1031 LYSBRIS SEAWAYS
IMO 9144263
7,500 1999
16.1
E
1032 FWN BONAFIDE
IMO 9321108
11,534 2006
16.1
E
1033 BORE WAY
IMO 9892884
6,768 2022
16.1
E
1034 LEMLAND
IMO 9415040
8,850 2009
16.2
E
1035 NAVIN EAGLE
IMO 9485186
7,966 2008
16.2
E
1036 PAUWGRACHT
IMO 9448308
19,328 2010
16.2
E
1037 WARNOWBORG
IMO 9505572
9,648 2011
16.3
E
1038 TALI
IMO 9173692
13,340 1998
16.3
E
1039 KAREWOOD BRAVE
IMO 9281516
6,315 2006
16.3
E
1040 CDRY WHITE
IMO 9365506
8,537 2010
16.4
E
1041 ARIA VIBE
IMO 9004504
9,591 1992
16.4
E
1042 POTTERSGRACHT
IMO 9424560
19,349 2010
16.4
E
1043 AMELAND
IMO 9508794
8,398 2009
16.4
E
1044 OPTIMA
IMO 9210244
9,022 2000
16.4
E
1045 WILSON NORTH
IMO 9430947
8,691 2010
16.5
E
1046 GALA
IMO 9304461
12,578 2005
16.5
E
1047 EVITA
IMO 9381433
8,169 2009
16.5
E
1048 PAN BOREAS
IMO 9488645
8,090 2008
16.5
E
1049 SUA
IMO 9436276
7,502 2009
16.5
E
1050 FLORAGRACHT
IMO 9509968
12,178 2011
16.5
E
Page 21 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.