Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,093 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
17.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.91)
+59% higher
E

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 643 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 643 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 541 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.21
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1051 BOCS PASSION
IMO 9500065
12,906 2010
16.6
E
1052 GABRIELA H
IMO 9147863
6,790 1998
16.6
E
1053 MARGARETHA
IMO 9240548
10,526 2002
16.6
E
1054 M/V MANISA SOLE
IMO 9306304
8,211 2006
16.6
E
1055 DINTELBORG
IMO 9163685
8,832 1999
16.6
E
1056 PIETERSGRACHT
IMO 9448384
19,864 2012
16.7
E
1057 EBRU
IMO 9235490
8,961 2000
16.7
E
1058 HAPPY STAR
IMO 9661259
18,062 2014
16.7
E
1059 PROPUS
IMO 9133757
9,387 1997
16.7
E
1060 PIJLGRACHT
IMO 9448358
19,379 2011
16.7
E
1061 MARBELLA
IMO 9406958
8,546 2008
16.7
E
1062 TANGO REY
IMO 9214185
8,600 2001
16.7
E
1063 PUKA
IMO 9374973
12,016 2007
16.7
E
1064 SEVEN AMARANTA
IMO 9306445
8,259 2007
16.8
E
1065 SAFI M
IMO 8502470
9,650 1985
16.8
E
1066 HALLAND
IMO 9436238
6,805 2008
16.8
E
1067 SDS RED
IMO 9365518
8,546 2010
16.8
E
1068 HAPPY SKY
IMO 9457220
17,683 2013
16.8
E
1069 FWN PROVIDER
IMO 9770713
10,589 2017
16.8
E
1070 COE ANNA
IMO 9366160
9,231 2012
16.8
E
1071 MANISA SILVANA
IMO 9306316
8,515 2006
16.8
E
1072 VICTORIA
IMO 9523926
8,546 2010
16.9
E
1073 MANISA EMY / LEUVEBORG
IMO 9421063
8,656 2008
16.9
E
1074 ROIBEIRA
IMO 9414187
7,781 2007
16.9
E
1075 VERTOM MERIDIAAN
IMO 9385881
8,045 2010
16.9
E
1076 MANISA BELLA / LENNEBORG
IMO 9421075
8,668 2008
16.9
E
1077 HAPPY RIVER
IMO 9139294
15,443 1997
16.9
E
1078 KARELIS-72
IMO 9433690
6,917 2008
17.0
E
1079 KARELIS-71
IMO 9383883
6,882 2006
17.0
E
1080 AUJAQ
IMO 9081320
12,730 1994
17.0
E
1081 FRISIANA
IMO 9385893
8,027 2010
17.0
E
1082 SIDER SONJA
IMO 9432505
8,546 2008
17.1
E
1083 MUNTGRACHT
IMO 9571545
11,677 2012
17.1
E
1084 BILLIE
IMO 9488047
12,696 2011
17.1
E
1085 SDS GREEN
IMO 9504621
8,537 2010
17.1
E
1086 FLORETGRACHT
IMO 9507611
12,067 2012
17.1
E
1087 MANISA BALU
IMO 9391036
8,450 2008
17.2
E
1088 RUDOLF
IMO 9535591
10,872 2010
17.2
E
1089 KFS MERYEM ANA
IMO 9575888
8,375 2010
17.3
E
1090 SKYLGE
IMO 9508809
8,398 2010
17.3
E
1091 PONTICA
IMO 9681974
9,005 2014
17.3
E
1092 ALEKSANDR ANTONOV
IMO 8972261
6,088 1986
17.3
E
1093 PLANTIJNGRACHT
IMO 9424572
19,330 2010
17.3
E
1094 ASG KHERSON
IMO 9255579
7,796 2002
17.3
E
1095 FRISIAN OCEAN
IMO 9385922
8,029 2001
17.3
E
1096 POOLGRACHT
IMO 9448360
19,382 2011
17.4
E
1097 MORAIME
IMO 9423853
7,126 2008
17.4
E
1098 PALEISGRACHT
IMO 9448346
19,496 2011
17.4
E
1099 SEA TRADER
IMO 9364007
6,355 2007
17.4
E
1100 JOE
IMO 9351153
7,750 2007
17.5
E
Page 22 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.