Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,696 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
16.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.95)
+21% higher
D

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.13
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.48
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1651 NATALIE
IMO 9361720
4,995 2006
16.6
D
1652 GUNDEM SERRA
IMO 9280122
6,029 2004
16.6
D
1653 ARKLOW VILLA
IMO 9772618
5,150 2018
16.6
D
1654 PARKGRACHT
IMO 9424546
20,171 2009
16.6
D
1655 JAZZ
IMO 8903026
3,806 1990
16.6
D
1656 ALEXANDRA
IMO 9196163
8,865 2000
16.6
D
1657 BERTHOLD K.
IMO 9374715
4,443 2008
16.6
D
1658 MOSTEIN
IMO 9100176
4,836 1996
16.6
D
1659 REGGEDIJK
IMO 9515034
4,891 2011
16.7
D
1660 BUGOE
IMO 9376775
5,484 2008
16.7
D
1661 BBC RUBY
IMO 9563744
14,310 2016
16.7
D
1662 PRIMA LADY
IMO 9195652
3,622 1999
16.7
D
1663 MANISA BALU
IMO 9391036
8,450 2008
16.7
D
1664 BBC EMERALD
IMO 9504750
14,371 2013
16.7
D
1665 LONGVIKING
IMO 9547324
6,132 2010
16.7
D
1666 BBC LIMA
IMO 9513622
7,819 2010
16.7
D
1667 LADY JAMILA
IMO 8606109
13,500 1987
16.8
D
1668 ALTO
IMO 9277333
7,701 2004
16.8
D
1669 WILSON BORG
IMO 9106924
3,931 1994
16.8
D
1670 ANMARE
IMO 9434589
3,689 2009
16.8
D
1671 HERBEIRA
IMO 9439216
7,796 2008
16.8
D
1672 MAASGRACHT
IMO 9571492
12,211 2011
16.8
D
1673 WILSON NICE
IMO 9430959
8,689 2010
16.8
D
1674 STROOMBANK
IMO 9356543
4,541 2009
16.8
D
1675 NAVITA
IMO 8324737
5,018 1984
16.8
D
1676 ECE
IMO 8911413
4,535 1991
16.8
D
1677 LINGEDIJK
IMO 9515010
4,891 2010
16.8
D
1678 COSTAMAR
IMO 9552020
5,217 2010
16.8
D
1679 ST. PAULI 2
IMO 9166467
5,425 1999
16.8
D
1680 WILSON BLYTH
IMO 9124419
3,713 1995
16.9
D
1681 VALERIE
IMO 9374739
4,942 2012
16.9
D
1682 ARKLOW GLEN
IMO 9874090
5,145 2023
16.9
D
1683 JOE
IMO 9351153
7,750 2007
16.9
D
1684 SCOT ISLES
IMO 9728758
4,782 2021
16.9
D
1685 BREB TRADER
IMO 9369526
3,850 2007
16.9
D
1686 BURHAN DIZMAN
IMO 9381809
7,728 2007
16.9
D
1687 NICKI
IMO 9370276
3,843 2006
16.9
D
1688 ANKA SKY
IMO 9145126
3,940 1997
16.9
D
1689 RHONE RIVER
IMO 9368613
6,354 2007
16.9
D
1690 ARKLOW VIKING
IMO 9772606
5,151 2018
16.9
D
1691 BREB CUXHAVEN
IMO 9421142
7,815 2010
16.9
D
1692 ARKLOW VALLEY
IMO 9772553
5,172 2016
16.9
D
1693 MANISA EMY / LEUVEBORG
IMO 9421063
8,656 2008
16.9
D
1694 BBC TOPAZ
IMO 9506734
14,288 2010
16.9
D
1695 ARCTICA HAV
IMO 8403571
2,308 1984
16.9
D
1696 OSTRA
IMO 9045742
6,584 2006
16.9
D
1697 PRIDE
IMO 9252931
2,981 2002
16.9
D
1698 KRISTA
IMO 9434759
7,459 2008
17.0
D
1699 ANKA BRAVE
IMO 9414199
7,778 2007
17.0
D
1700 NM COPENHAGEN
IMO 9534274
6,050 2010
17.0
D
Page 34 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.