Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#3,241 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
7.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
+50% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 627 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

121
Q4
138
'27 Q1
84
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
137
'27 Q4
132
'28 Q1
97
'28 Q2
111
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,691 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,478 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,478 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,121
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,121 of 1,121 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
3201 PIGMI
IMO 9470571
33,918 2011
7.2
E
3202 SOUTHERN CROSS
IMO 9606027
37,085 2014
7.2
E
3203 NJ EARTH
IMO 9229996
37,180 2003
7.2
E
3204 THEA G
IMO 9415246
30,790 2009
7.2
E
3205 EVER GALLANT
IMO 9624328
28,206 2012
7.2
E
3206 ELIKI
IMO 9470325
28,228 2011
7.2
E
3207 MY LAMA
IMO 9339791
28,409 2005
7.2
E
3208 WADI ALARAB
IMO 9107681
64,214 1995
7.2
E
3209 SEAGULL
IMO 9452505
58,609 2010
7.2
E
3210 AFRICAN MAGNOLIA
IMO 9666455
28,345 2016
7.2
E
3211 MESHKA
IMO 9588380
35,829 2011
7.2
E
3212 LORD HAMMOUR
IMO 9218088
28,471 2001
7.2
E
3213 CALOBRA
IMO 9739082
35,422 2015
7.2
E
3214 NANI K
IMO 9694995
37,423 2014
7.2
E
3215 TAZ
IMO 9703825
35,016 2015
7.2
E
3216 FETHIYE-M
IMO 9485899
37,995 2011
7.2
E
3217 KESTREL S
IMO 9489211
33,108 2010
7.2
E
3218 PENELOPE L
IMO 9714343
28,145 2015
7.2
E
3219 BELLA NADIA
IMO 9118252
16,860 1997
7.2
E
3220 AMANO-T
IMO 9117832
27,359 1996
7.3
E
3221 GREENTEC
IMO 9493509
33,035 2008
7.3
E
3222 BOS COSTA
IMO 9310616
28,709 2007
7.3
E
3223 HANDY PERTH
IMO 9628128
35,177 2013
7.3
E
3224 ORAWA
IMO 9386926
38,956 2009
7.3
E
3225 NEW LEADER
IMO 9471795
36,830 2011
7.3
E
3226 MAJESTIC NOOR
IMO 9138642
27,827 1997
7.3
E
3227 MOTHER M
IMO 9626613
35,856 2012
7.3
E
3228 ADAM-A
IMO 9114543
28,458 1995
7.3
E
3229 TRUE MARINER
IMO 9599822
38,239 2011
7.3
E
3230 COYOTE
IMO 9474216
35,010 2010
7.3
E
3231 THEBE
IMO 9697973
35,987 2014
7.3
E
3232 SAINT DIMITRIOS
IMO 9486398
33,788 2007
7.3
E
3233 MARINOR
IMO 9433559
56,784 2009
7.3
E
3234 T SYMPHONY
IMO 9611498
32,371 2011
7.3
E
3235 WL ATLANTIC
IMO 9489417
37,488 2010
7.3
E
3236 FRIENDLY ISLANDS
IMO 9615042
28,387 2006
7.3
E
3237 VALSAMITIS
IMO 9629823
34,827 2012
7.3
E
3238 BOSPHORUS-M
IMO 9359818
55,903 2006
7.3
E
3239 YEOMAN BANK
IMO 7422881
38,997 1982
7.3
E
3240 WL UGLICH
IMO 9674373
37,666 2014
7.3
E
3241 POLARIS Z
IMO 9109512
18,233 1995
7.3
E
3242 IOANNA D
IMO 9634969
34,816 2012
7.3
E
3243 NJ CALLISTO
IMO 9497452
31,796 2012
7.3
E
3244 ALONISSOS
IMO 9566916
57,155 2010
7.3
E
3245 T PRIME
IMO 9611503
32,451 2011
7.3
E
3246 MILOS
IMO 9138446
24,045 1997
7.3
E
3247 VALERIO
IMO 9244037
27,112 2003
7.3
E
3248 DSM CASTOR
IMO 9230000
35,000 2003
7.3
E
3249 ATROMITOS L
IMO 9605073
28,227 2012
7.3
E
3250 KOCIEWIE
IMO 9423798
38,981 2009
7.3
E
Page 65 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.