Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,486 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
5.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
+15% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2451 ALKYONIS
IMO 9709465
37,418 2016
5.4
D
2452 ERNEST VINBERG
IMO 9707649
63,411 2015
5.4
D
2453 FEDERAL KIVALINA
IMO 9205885
36,578 2000
5.4
D
2454 SIDER MIRAMARE
IMO 9865233
39,172 2019
5.4
D
2455 HAATO
IMO 9589786
61,472 2011
5.4
D
2456 CAPTAIN D LEMPESIS
IMO 9364801
53,466 2005
5.4
D
2457 SHUN FU XING
IMO 9213363
75,172 2001
5.4
D
2458 SINOP
IMO 9644184
63,200 2013
5.4
D
2459 NEW ISLAND
IMO 9258349
47,304 2002
5.4
D
2460 ARUNA CIHAN
IMO 9543756
57,411 2011
5.4
D
2461 ASTRO SANISTRA
IMO 9805661
60,365 2018
5.4
D
2462 OMURTAG
IMO 9605839
56,709 2012
5.4
D
2463 TUNSIN
IMO 9768954
37,657 2017
5.4
D
2464 FEDERAL DELTA
IMO 9805271
34,492 2018
5.4
D
2465 AG VALOR
IMO 9312327
28,510 2004
5.4
D
2466 ENJOY PROSPERITY
IMO 9545728
56,726 2011
5.4
D
2467 LADY SPERANZA
IMO 9200574
16,870 2000
5.4
D
2468 LALE S
IMO 9603051
57,970 2011
5.4
D
2469 DODO
IMO 9662320
39,017 2012
5.4
D
2470 CL HEIDI
IMO 9720952
63,572 2016
5.4
D
2471 FUJI HARMONY
IMO 9913999
39,989 2022
5.4
D
2472 NEW SIHAM
IMO 9197882
31,025 1999
5.4
D
2473 FEDERAL NAGARA
IMO 9805257
34,492 2018
5.4
D
2474 ROOSTER
IMO 9723942
37,896 2013
5.4
D
2475 ROSALIA
IMO 9696826
39,907 2016
5.4
D
2476 VIVA GLOBUS
IMO 9251315
52,300 2002
5.4
D
2477 FEDERAL MONTREAL
IMO 9838474
34,492 2019
5.4
D
2478 SEA MOON
IMO 9228227
28,494 2002
5.4
D
2479 MURGASH
IMO 9996965
32,193 2025
5.4
D
2480 LUGANO
IMO 9132662
28,350 1996
5.4
D
2481 LI DA CHANG
IMO 9547817
56,316 2010
5.4
D
2482 DENSA SEAL
IMO 9649110
37,586 2011
5.4
D
2483 DSM FERRO
IMO 9236092
50,320 2001
5.4
D
2484 BAO RUI LING
IMO 9617258
47,522 2014
5.4
D
2485 FEDERAL SHIMANTO
IMO 9218404
32,787 2001
5.4
D
2486 NORDLOIRE
IMO 9596026
37,212 2013
5.4
D
2487 JIN CHAO
IMO 9691412
63,518 2014
5.4
D
2488 QING HUA SHAN
IMO 9741528
63,457 2016
5.4
D
2489 FEDERAL SATSUKI
IMO 9515101
35,885 2012
5.4
D
2490 OUTRIDER
IMO 9701061
33,190 2016
5.4
D
2491 FEDERAL FRONTIER
IMO 9866768
34,492 2021
5.4
D
2492 JNS LAKE
IMO 1039357
40,489 2024
5.4
D
2493 FEDERAL SETO
IMO 9267209
36,489 2004
5.4
D
2494 RUBINA
IMO 9725512
39,959 2018
5.4
D
2495 BERGE RISHIRI
IMO 9713222
35,172 2017
5.4
D
2496 CS JADEN
IMO 9660061
38,101 2013
5.4
D
2497 TAURUS
IMO 9273818
76,616 2004
5.4
D
2498 YANNIS
IMO 9401910
50,779 2009
5.4
D
2499 CAIPIRINHA
IMO 9714769
38,668 2015
5.4
D
2500 MILAS
IMO 9279379
50,316 2004
5.4
D
Page 50 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.