Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#308 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
2.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-44% greener
A

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
302 MIKELA P.
IMO 9440382
158,007 2009
2.9
A
301 SILVERWAY
IMO 9742912
157,781 2017
2.9
A
303 NISSOS IOS
IMO 9886770
157,447 2021
2.9
A
307 SIENA
IMO 1030404
158,932 2025
2.9
A
306 TORM HOUSTON
IMO 9904883
115,414 2022
2.9
A
305 OLYMPIC FRIENDSHIP
IMO 9745251
158,886 2014
2.9
A
304 POPI SAZAKLIS
IMO 9817494
157,610 2018
2.9
A
308 SEA RAPTOR
IMO 9356751
50,343 2007
2.9
A
309 SEAVIOLET
IMO 9790983
158,480 2015
2.9
A
311 AURA M
IMO 9595333
156,245 2020
2.9
A
310 SPYROS
IMO 9877171
158,081 2020
2.9
A
317 DINO
IMO 9923994
157,010 2020
2.9
A
316 FREUD
IMO 9804461
157,620 2018
2.9
A
315 SONANGOL CABINDA
IMO 9575589
157,748 2010
2.9
A
314 BALTIC LOYALTY
IMO 9411953
317,441 2010
2.9
A
313 VICTORY VENTURE
IMO 9773040
114,456 2017
2.9
A
312 STELLA
IMO 9461776
164,714 2011
2.9
A
318 EFFIE MAERSK
IMO 9682978
158,295 2017
2.9
A
320 SEAMAGIC
IMO 9997969
113,947 2025
2.9
A
319 CAPE ANTIBES
IMO 1054632
113,967 2023
2.9
A
321 JIAOLONG
IMO 9379208
159,021 2009
2.9
A
323 GENEVA STAR
IMO 1028528
157,993 2025
2.9
A
322 OTTOMAN EQUITY
IMO 9404950
150,545 2008
2.9
A
324 NISSOS SIFNOS
IMO 9884045
157,447 2020
2.9
A
326 NORDIC HAWK
IMO 9749491
158,594 2014
2.9
A
325 COBALT NOVA
IMO 9534028
299,989 2011
2.9
A
327 MARATHI
IMO 9772357
149,991 2014
3.0
A
329 SHENLONG
IMO 9379210
159,021 2009
3.0
A
328 COSTAS P
IMO 9934321
157,010 2021
3.0
A
334 FAIRWAY
IMO 9590319
160,250 2013
3.0
A
333 NEW SPIROS
IMO 1023322
116,926 2025
3.0
A
332 NAVIG8 PROVIDENCE
IMO 9947378
109,995 2023
3.0
A
331 LENI P.
IMO 9594133
158,640 2010
3.0
A
330 MARAN HERMES
IMO 9761346
156,458 2017
3.0
A
336 ZEUS
IMO 9886378
159,153 2021
3.0
B
335 FRONT ULL
IMO 9600932
157,000 2010
3.0
B
340 EVRIDIKI
IMO 9318137
167,295 2007
3.0
B
339 PATMOS I
IMO 9800245
156,917 2018
3.0
B
338 DELTA SKY
IMO 9410181
166,092 2009
3.0
B
337 MONTE UDALA
IMO 9785823
156,341 2018
3.0
B
348 ATHENS SPIRIT
IMO 9594793
158,529 2012
3.0
B
349 ECO WEST COAST
IMO 9902811
157,668 2021
3.0
B
346 NISSOS ANTIMILOS
IMO 9895226
157,447 2021
3.0
B
347 PLATA EAST
IMO 9410997
297,007 2010
3.0
B
345 MOTELE OLA
IMO 9399492
156,852 2006
3.0
B
344 CAPE BENAT
IMO 9406013
156,642 2010
3.0
B
343 PLATANOS
IMO 9825477
114,578 2019
3.0
B
342 MONTESTENA
IMO 9585883
159,372 2012
3.0
B
341 LORAX
IMO 9903413
109,990 2022
3.0
B
350 SEA CORAL
IMO 9935650
156,674 2020
3.0
B
Page 7 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.