Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Oil Tankers

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,786 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
20.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
+298% higher
E
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1751 SALINA M
IMO 9340910
11,283 2007
16.2
E
1752 ASTRAL
IMO 9371878
11,317 2006
16.2
E
1753 ASTINA
IMO 9320063
11,283 2006
16.3
E
1754 CALAJUNCO M
IMO 9359571
21,600 2007
16.3
E
1755 WHITE STAR
IMO 9799109
7,904 2017
16.3
E
1756 CHALLAH
IMO 9933913
9,137 2022
16.5
E
1757 EASTERN SPIRAEA
IMO 9909754
11,531 2022
17.0
E
1758 NAV DURGA
IMO 9260005
37,198 2003
17.0
E
1759 FURE SPEAR
IMO 9409273
16,585 2009
17.0
E
1760 SONGA PEARL
IMO 9444455
17,539 2008
17.0
E
1761 GANGES STAR
IMO 9496692
13,013 2010
17.3
E
1762 SIRI KNUTSEN
IMO 9247168
37,494 2004
17.4
E
1763 KIISLA
IMO 9267558
14,750 2004
17.5
E
1764 EVIE PG
IMO 9396359
9,990 2007
17.6
E
1765 EBERHART ESSBERGER
IMO 9939802
7,129 2024
17.8
E
1766 HEINRICH ESSBERGER
IMO 9939814
7,109 2024
17.9
E
1767 COLORADO STAR
IMO 9527609
13,021 2010
17.9
E
1768 NORSIGN WAVE
IMO 9312080
16,772 2006
18.1
E
1769 BASILUZZO M.
IMO 9323857
12,000 2006
18.1
E
1770 NATIG ALIYEV
IMO 9194000
19,800 2002
18.1
E
1771 PANAREA M
IMO 9329148
11,420 2006
18.2
E
1772 BAUSTELLA
IMO 9812133
7,995 2018
18.4
E
1773 STELLA POLARIS
IMO 9187057
8,297 1999
18.5
E
1774 BRO ANNA
IMO 9344435
16,867 2008
18.7
E
1775 LILSTELLA
IMO 9794771
7,944 2016
18.9
E
1776 MELIGUNIS M
IMO 9451214
11,258 2008
18.9
E
1777 SINAR MINAHASA
IMO 9433860
12,693 2007
19.0
E
1778 JOHN T. ESSBERGER
IMO 9939797
7,100 2023
19.0
E
1779 XT PEACE
IMO 9980265
7,493 2023
19.0
E
1780 SONGA SAPPHIRE
IMO 9444467
17,596 2008
19.2
E
1781 FELIX
IMO 9464182
8,963 2009
19.2
E
1782 SANDVIKEN
IMO 9803649
12,659 2018
19.4
E
1783 SKUTEVIKEN
IMO 9803651
12,658 2018
19.6
E
1784 LISELOTTE ESSBERGER
IMO 9939785
7,134 2023
19.9
E
1785 IVER BEAUTY
IMO 9588263
6,175 2011
20.2
E
1786 GOLDEN DAHLIA
IMO 9858785
34,834 2021
20.3
E
1787 IVER BLESSING
IMO 9588287
6,189 2011
20.4
E
1788 BLACK SHARK
IMO 9480655
8,476 2010
21.1
E
1789 SONGA OPAL
IMO 9473913
17,588 2009
21.3
E
Page 36 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.