Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,723 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
15.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
+49% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.41
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1701 NORDIC ISTRIA
IMO 9474383
1,085 TEU 2011
15.7
E
1702 DANIEL A
IMO 9238064
1,221 TEU 2001
15.8
E
1703 CMA CGM SINNAMARY
IMO 9845673
2,296 TEU 2020
15.8
E
1704 AYDOGAN
IMO 9149897
1,730 TEU 1999
15.9
E
1705 CONTSHIP DAY
IMO 9509786
1,496 TEU 2010
15.9
E
1706 KARLA A
IMO 9297577
1,676 TEU 2004
15.9
E
1707 TAMANRASSET
IMO 9760615
1,700 TEU 2017
16.0
E
1708 GERDA
IMO 9432232
1,421 TEU 2009
16.1
E
1709 MOLIVA
IMO 9454034
951 TEU 2014
16.1
E
1710 AS SELINA
IMO 9516789
1,400 TEU 2012
16.1
E
1711 CMA CGM GULF EXPRESS
IMO 9239874
1,641 TEU 2002
16.2
E
1712 OOCL RAUMA
IMO 9462794
1,425 TEU 2009
16.2
E
1713 MSC MARYLENA II
IMO 9169031
1,388 TEU 1998
16.3
E
1714 RMS MEL
IMO 9387607
698 TEU 2008
16.3
E
1715 CMA CGM KAILAS
IMO 9339545
1,858 TEU 2006
16.4
E
1716 AS FABIANA
IMO 9395109
1,284 TEU 2007
16.4
E
1717 WARNOW MASTER
IMO 9449833
1,496 TEU 2006
16.4
E
1718 SC MEDFORD
IMO 9275103
1,200 TEU 2004
16.4
E
1719 ATLANTIC NORTH
IMO 9236597
1,129 TEU 2002
16.4
E
1720 THETIS D
IMO 9372274
1,421 TEU 2009
16.4
E
1721 RACHEL BORCHARD
IMO 9212010
1,216 TEU 2000
16.5
E
1722 MSC ESHA F
IMO 9004231
923 TEU 1993
16.5
E
1723 MSC MIA SUMMER II
IMO 9169067
1,388 TEU 1999
16.5
E
1724 HEINRICH EHLER
IMO 9372200
1,421 TEU 2008
16.5
E
1725 BG RED
IMO 9976965
1,400 TEU 2022
16.6
E
1726 CMA CGM BLOSSOM
IMO 9962524
1,096 TEU 2023
16.6
E
1727 CMA CGM KOUROU
IMO 9845659
2,296 TEU 2020
16.6
E
1728 DHANU
IMO 9122473
1,730 TEU 2001
16.7
E
1729 MEDKON MERSIN
IMO 9430040
232 TEU 2008
16.7
E
1730 MSC HOGGAR
IMO 9286449
858 TEU 2004
16.8
E
1731 WEC JAN STEEN
IMO 9354416
868 TEU 2007
16.9
E
1732 HALSTED
IMO 9337262
2,824 TEU 2007
16.9
E
1733 RMS TEAM
IMO 9282170
1,096 TEU 2004
16.9
E
1734 JAN
IMO 9477335
1,338 TEU 2009
16.9
E
1735 MARBURG
IMO 9387592
1,025 TEU 2009
16.9
E
1736 MSC ELKE F
IMO 9318773
956 TEU 2005
17.0
E
1737 BURAK BAYRAKTAR
IMO 9260536
858 TEU 2002
17.0
E
1738 CONTSHIP JET
IMO 9348625
1,267 TEU 2007
17.1
E
1739 MICHIGAN
IMO 9437139
1,296 TEU 2008
17.1
E
1740 ALEXANDER B
IMO 9328649
1,223 TEU 2006
17.1
E
1741 FIONA
IMO 9149885
1,730 TEU 1998
17.1
E
1742 ALANA
IMO 9297589
1,008 TEU 2004
17.1
E
1743 BALTIC SHARK
IMO 9315032
868 TEU 2004
17.4
E
1744 ATLANTIC WEST
IMO 9396610
1,345 TEU 2008
17.4
E
1745 JONATHAN P
IMO 9357872
1,732 TEU 2006
17.4
E
1746 MSC ROMINA II
IMO 9449821
1,496 TEU 2009
17.4
E
1747 MSC ORTOLAN II
IMO 9401685
1,740 TEU 2009
17.5
E
1748 UNI-PHOENIX
IMO 9202170
1,618 TEU 1998
17.5
E
1749 BALLATA
IMO 9327578
1,118 TEU 2006
17.5
E
1750 YM INVENTIVE
IMO 9319105
1,805 TEU 2004
17.5
E
Page 35 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.