Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#409 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
5.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-46% greener
A
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
402 MSC SONIA
IMO 9404663
13,200 TEU 2010
5.6
A
401 MSC PANTERA
IMO 9975557
101,078 2024
5.6
A
404 MSC AURORA
IMO 9484481
13,050 TEU 2012
5.6
A
403 MSC ARICA
IMO 9619452
8,762 TEU 2012
5.6
A
405 COSCO SHIPPING HIMALAYAS
IMO 9757840
13,636 TEU 2017
5.6
A
406 EVER FOREVER
IMO 9850575
11,000 TEU 2020
5.6
A
407 APL SAVANNAH
IMO 9597513
9,200 TEU 2010
5.6
A
408 VUNG TAU EXPRESS
IMO 9767998
10,100 TEU 2018
5.6
A
409 MSC AINO
IMO 9770751
8,800 TEU 2019
5.6
A
412 OOCL BREMERHAVEN
IMO 9979254
5,920 TEU 2024
5.7
A
411 MSC DANIT
IMO 9404649
13,200 TEU 2009
5.7
A
410 ONE MUNCHEN
IMO 9706750
13,870 TEU 2015
5.7
A
413 MSC PERLE
IMO 9503732
13,092 TEU 2013
5.7
A
415 COSCO SHIPPING ANDES
IMO 9757888
13,636 TEU 2018
5.7
A
414 MSC DEILA
IMO 9461415
14,000 TEU 2012
5.7
A
416 COSCO GLORY
IMO 9466245
13,092 TEU 2011
5.7
A
417 MSC TOKYO
IMO 9318046
8,204 TEU 2006
5.7
A
418 CMA CGM APOLLON
IMO 9882516
15,000 TEU 2022
5.7
A
419 MSC PINA
IMO 9339272
9,200 TEU 2007
5.7
A
420 SCI DELHI
IMO 9699127
9,034 TEU 2014
5.7
A
421 TAMPA TRIUMPH
IMO 9737462
13,870 TEU 2017
5.7
B
422 MSC LUCY
IMO 9289104
8,034 TEU 2005
5.7
B
424 MSC DAKAR X
IMO 9605231
9,400 TEU 2013
5.7
B
423 XIN LOS ANGELES
IMO 9307217
9,572 TEU 2006
5.7
B
426 APL FULLERTON
IMO 9632026
13,892 TEU 2014
5.7
B
425 MSC NAIROBI X
IMO 9605243
9,400 TEU 2013
5.7
B
427 MAERSK SERANGOON
IMO 9315214
5,648 TEU 2007
5.7
B
428 MSC CARLOTTA
IMO 9756731
9,962 TEU 2017
5.8
B
429 CMA CGM T. ROOSEVELT
IMO 9780873
14,414 TEU 2017
5.8
B
430 MSC LIVORNO
IMO 9461427
14,000 TEU 2010
5.8
B
431 CMA CGM AMERIGO VESPUCCI
IMO 9454395
13,344 TEU 2010
5.8
B
432 COSCO INDONESIA
IMO 9448786
8,500 TEU 2010
5.8
B
435 KIEL EXPRESS
IMO 9229855
7,179 TEU 2003
5.8
B
434 CMA CGM VASCO DE GAMA
IMO 9706889
17,859 TEU 2015
5.8
B
433 OAKLAND EXPRESS
IMO 9667174
13,800 TEU 2014
5.8
B
436 APL PHOENIX
IMO 9597501
9,200 TEU 2013
5.8
B
437 MSC CAPELLA
IMO 9465289
13,100 TEU 2012
5.8
B
438 EA CHARA
IMO 9967483
7,092 TEU 2021
5.8
B
439 MSC ALEXANDRA
IMO 9461374
14,000 TEU 2010
5.8
B
440 ESTELLE MAERSK
IMO 9321495
11,000 TEU 2006
5.8
B
443 MSC INES
IMO 9305714
9,100 TEU 2006
5.8
B
442 MSC SAO PAULO V
IMO 9147071
4,688 TEU 1998
5.8
B
441 MSC MOMBASA
IMO 9967275
8,002 TEU 2024
5.8
B
445 CAPE TAINARO
IMO 9706205
11,000 TEU 2017
5.8
B
444 DORTMUND EXPRESS
IMO 9461051
13,000 TEU 2012
5.8
B
447 ZIM EAGLE
IMO 9960502
5,300 TEU 2024
5.9
B
446 MSC SUSANNA
IMO 9290543
9,200 TEU 2005
5.9
B
450 ATLANTA EXPRESS
IMO 9667162
13,800 TEU 2014
5.9
B
449 MSC YOKOHAMA
IMO 9285665
7,455 TEU 2004
5.9
B
448 NORTHERN JAMBOREE
IMO 9450363
8,400 TEU 2010
5.9
B
Page 9 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.