Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Bulk Carriers

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#105 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
2.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
-47% greener
A
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
104 BERGE KOSCIUSZKO
IMO 9682954
181,394 2014
2.5
A
102 CAPE PEONY
IMO 9425447
181,325 2012
2.5
A
101 NAVIOS SAKURA
IMO 9951927
182,169 2023
2.5
A
103 MINERAL SUBIC
IMO 9456678
179,396 2011
2.5
A
108 ANNABEL L
IMO 9853711
180,803 2019
2.5
A
107 BERGE MAWSON
IMO 9738868
181,160 2015
2.5
A
106 BULK SPAIN
IMO 9469015
176,000 2011
2.5
A
105 CEMTEX SINCERITY
IMO 9820661
82,200 2018
2.5
A
109 ATLANTIC DRAGON
IMO 9874600
209,170 2020
2.5
A
110 GREAT BLOSSOM
IMO 9986910
82,781 2024
2.5
A
111 MARAN BRILLIANCE
IMO 9721035
179,129 2016
2.5
A
112 KANARIS
IMO 9469857
178,064 2010
2.5
A
113 MIN MAY
IMO 9751004
180,004 2016
2.5
A
114 CAPE HARMONY
IMO 9514212
178,373 2012
2.5
A
117 ASL OTSL 2
IMO 9500766
180,643 2012
2.5
A
116 CIC PAOLA
IMO 9692820
181,059 2014
2.5
A
115 BACON
IMO 9639517
205,170 2013
2.5
A
119 SEMA M
IMO 9304150
106,552 2007
2.5
A
118 FPMC B IMAGE
IMO 9423334
206,699 2012
2.5
A
122 GINA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9942732
182,002 2023
2.6
A
124 SCARLET CYPRESS
IMO 1016109
82,010 2024
2.6
A
121 CAPE BRITANNIA
IMO 9409065
178,369 2009
2.6
A
120 FLAGSHIP
IMO 9514224
176,387 2013
2.6
A
123 MARVELLOUS
IMO 9579872
180,000 2011
2.6
A
127 MARAN CONQUEROR
IMO 9581241
179,718 2012
2.6
A
126 TAMPA
IMO 9363027
177,723 2008
2.6
A
125 KERYNIA
IMO 9961439
82,114 2024
2.6
A
128 MARAN FUTURE
IMO 9739240
179,318 2015
2.6
A
129 NAVIOS ANTARES
IMO 9481257
169,059 2006
2.6
A
130 STAR MARTHA
IMO 9564097
180,274 2010
2.6
A
132 STAR VESTA
IMO 9446506
180,136 2010
2.6
A
131 MAGDALENA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9638044
206,010 2013
2.6
A
133 WILLIAM OLDENDORFF
IMO 9623570
180,000 2017
2.6
A
135 CHRISTINA V
IMO 9658915
77,211 2014
2.6
A
134 LADY WYNN
IMO 9861794
182,514 2020
2.6
A
137 SSI BRILLIANT
IMO 9567099
175,428 2012
2.6
A
136 PELOREUS
IMO 9702534
182,496 2014
2.6
A
142 CAPE LILY
IMO 9612430
181,303 2012
2.6
A
141 ALPHA OPTIMISM
IMO 9722388
179,258 2016
2.6
A
140 GOLDEN ZHEJIANG
IMO 9443619
175,837 2010
2.6
A
139 SAKIZAYA XCEL
IMO 9934917
82,446 2022
2.6
A
138 TAHO EUDAIMONIA
IMO 9919319
84,460 2022
2.6
A
143 CAPETAN IOANNIS
IMO 9589695
180,652 2011
2.6
A
144 HERO
IMO 9446867
178,076 2010
2.6
A
147 BBG LIJIANG
IMO 9971953
82,788 2024
2.6
A
146 SAKIZAYA TREASURE
IMO 9861328
82,500 2020
2.6
A
145 YUAN HANG WEI YE
IMO 9371799
50,785 2006
2.6
A
150 NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9743265
180,960 2015
2.6
A
149 WANG MAY
IMO 9837327
180,682 2019
2.6
A
148 CS WU HAN
IMO 9874715
180,000 2021
2.6
A
Page 3 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.