Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,008 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-20% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1006 FAR EASTERN JUPITER
IMO 9442768
82,655 2007
3.7
B
1005 YASA MARS
IMO 9848120
61,081 2019
3.7
B
1004 BRIGHT VENTURE
IMO 9868883
81,486 2020
3.7
B
1003 NEW ACACIA
IMO 1014591
39,415 2022
3.7
B
1002 ORION
IMO 9735945
63,473 2015
3.7
B
1001 DONA BIBI
IMO 9600619
81,966 2012
3.7
B
1000 SAINT MYRON
IMO 9675597
77,116 2014
3.7
B
1022 NAVIOS CENTAURUS
IMO 9590072
81,472 2012
3.8
B
1021 APOLLO.GR
IMO 9760079
60,437 2013
3.8
B
1020 EFE MERSIN
IMO 9792022
60,293 2017
3.8
B
1019 CMB TENIERS
IMO 9916214
63,611 2021
3.8
B
1018 CL CHANGSHA
IMO 9953286
64,726 2023
3.8
B
1017 XING YANG HAI
IMO 9949297
85,016 2022
3.8
B
1016 XIN HAI TONG 812
IMO 9639555
81,563 2013
3.8
B
1015 DANHIL
IMO 9632959
81,354 2012
3.8
B
1014 FEDERAL INDUS
IMO 9860582
63,458 2019
3.8
B
1013 KIM OLDENDORFF
IMO 9848998
81,284 2019
3.8
B
1012 OSHIMA JAPAN
IMO 9872975
62,661 2021
3.8
B
1011 MERCURY RISING
IMO 9687708
81,027 2015
3.8
B
1010 BULK ITALY
IMO 9875032
81,603 2020
3.8
B
1009 TAI STEADINESS
IMO 9961233
64,589 2024
3.8
B
1023 AEOLIAN FORTUNE
IMO 9461192
82,099 2011
3.8
B
1008 RUBY
IMO 9714707
61,192 2013
3.8
B
1024 BRIGHT IMABARI
IMO 9801316
63,504 2017
3.8
B
1026 NEFELI
IMO 9317468
77,171 2009
3.8
B
1025 AQUAVITA ETERNITY
IMO 9880491
80,929 2021
3.8
B
1030 EMERALD JINTANG
IMO 9991525
63,910 2024
3.8
B
1036 CL HYAKU
IMO 9942081
63,492 2023
3.8
B
1029 QUEEN SARAH
IMO 9618666
81,221 2023
3.8
B
1035 CL ANZI HE
IMO 9890616
63,077 2020
3.8
B
1034 STAR ROBERTA
IMO 9700653
63,404 2015
3.8
B
1033 SEAHAWK
IMO 9974436
63,253 2025
3.8
B
1028 FENG LI HAI
IMO 9747534
63,424 2017
3.8
B
1031 SENECA
IMO 9591179
83,975 2013
3.8
B
1027 ZHENG YAO
IMO 9601883
81,716 2014
3.8
B
1032 MYRA
IMO 9418456
82,226 2010
3.8
B
1050 KILIAN OLDENDORFF
IMO 9863089
81,246 2020
3.8
B
1049 JUST
IMO 9581370
57,551 2011
3.8
B
1048 MIM VANGELIS JR
IMO 9302786
76,619 2005
3.8
B
1047 GUO YUAN 28
IMO 9591466
75,864 2013
3.8
B
1046 MAIRINI
IMO 9474670
79,023 2010
3.8
B
1045 SFERA
IMO 9304576
76,801 2006
3.8
B
1044 FRONTIER HARVEST
IMO 9487976
179,293 2011
3.8
B
1043 SEAEAGLE II
IMO 9870886
61,305 2019
3.8
B
1042 GENCO SCORPION
IMO 9729477
64,000 2015
3.8
B
1041 KAREN OLDENDORFF
IMO 1021714
82,116 2025
3.8
B
1040 ANADOLU S
IMO 9667758
52,199 2014
3.8
B
1039 GOLDEN FURIOUS
IMO 9860128
80,595 2021
3.8
B
1038 NAVIOS AMITIE
IMO 9909053
82,002 2015
3.8
B
1037 SEALADY
IMO 9748734
60,436 2016
3.8
B
Page 21 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.