Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,007 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
-21% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 558 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,510 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,442 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,405 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,096
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,096 of 1,096 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1003 SAINT MYRON
IMO 9675597
77,116 2014
3.7
B
1002 SEA NOVA
IMO 9734719
81,773 2017
3.7
B
1001 YONG HAI 9
IMO 9500948
75,485 2010
3.7
B
999 BRIGHT VENTURE
IMO 9868883
81,486 2020
3.7
B
998 ORPHEUS
IMO 9646675
75,631 2017
3.7
B
1006 VULCANIA
IMO 9718686
82,036 2015
3.7
B
1020 DANHIL
IMO 9632959
81,354 2012
3.8
B
1021 STAR ROBERTA
IMO 9700653
63,426 2015
3.8
B
1016 FEDERAL INDUS
IMO 9860582
63,458 2019
3.8
B
1018 KIM OLDENDORFF
IMO 9848998
81,284 2019
3.8
B
1017 XIN HAI TONG 812
IMO 9639555
81,563 2012
3.8
B
1012 MERCURY RISING
IMO 9687708
81,027 2015
3.8
B
1015 OSHIMA JAPAN
IMO 9872975
62,661 2021
3.8
B
1014 BULK ITALY
IMO 9875032
81,603 2020
3.8
B
1013 CL CHANGSHA
IMO 9953286
64,726 2023
3.8
B
1011 AEOLIAN FORTUNE
IMO 9461192
82,099 2011
3.8
B
1010 TAI STEADINESS
IMO 9961233
64,589 2024
3.8
B
1019 CMB TENIERS
IMO 9916214
63,611 2021
3.8
B
1009 APOLLO.GR
IMO 9760079
60,437 2016
3.8
B
1008 NAVIOS CENTAURUS
IMO 9590072
81,472 2012
3.8
B
1007 RUBY
IMO 9714707
61,192 2013
3.8
B
1022 XING YANG HAI
IMO 9949297
85,016 2022
3.8
B
1023 CL ANZI HE
IMO 9890616
63,077 2020
3.8
B
1027 QUEEN SARAH
IMO 9618666
81,221 2023
3.8
B
1029 MYRA
IMO 9418456
82,226 2010
3.8
B
1026 EMERALD JINTANG
IMO 9991525
63,910 2024
3.8
B
1034 ZHENG YAO
IMO 9601883
81,716 2014
3.8
B
1033 SEAHAWK
IMO 9974436
63,253 2025
3.8
B
1032 NEFELI
IMO 9317468
77,171 2009
3.8
B
1025 FENG LI HAI
IMO 9747534
63,424 2017
3.8
B
1031 SENECA
IMO 9591179
83,975 2013
3.8
B
1030 AQUAVITA ETERNITY
IMO 9880491
80,929 2021
3.8
B
1024 CL HYAKU
IMO 9942081
63,492 2023
3.8
B
1028 BRIGHT IMABARI
IMO 9801316
63,504 2017
3.8
B
1050 EFE MERSIN
IMO 9792022
60,000 2017
3.8
B
1049 SEALADY
IMO 9748734
60,436 2016
3.8
B
1048 GOLDEN FURIOUS
IMO 9860128
80,595 2021
3.8
B
1047 ANADOLU S
IMO 9667758
52,199 2014
3.8
B
1046 KAREN OLDENDORFF
IMO 1021714
82,116 2025
3.8
B
1045 NAVIOS AMITIE
IMO 9909053
82,002 2015
3.8
B
1044 KILIAN OLDENDORFF
IMO 9863089
81,246 2020
3.8
B
1043 GENCO SCORPION
IMO 9729477
64,000 2015
3.8
B
1042 EGRET STAR
IMO 9593751
81,678 2012
3.8
B
1041 SFERA
IMO 9304576
76,801 2006
3.8
B
1040 MIM VANGELIS JR
IMO 9302786
76,619 2005
3.8
B
1039 JUST
IMO 9581370
57,551 2011
3.8
B
1038 SEAEAGLE II
IMO 9870886
61,305 2019
3.8
B
1037 GUO YUAN 28
IMO 9591466
75,864 2013
3.8
B
1036 MAIRINI
IMO 9474670
79,023 2010
3.8
B
1035 FRONTIER HARVEST
IMO 9487976
179,293 2011
3.8
B
Page 21 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.